AR226-2598 I ^ I I REVISED GROUNDWATER FLOW I MODEL DUPONT WASHINGTON WORKS I WASHINGTON, WV I I I "') * I Date: January 2003 I Project No,: 18983635 7423 I I I CORPORATE REMEDIATION GROUP An Alliance between DuPont and URS Diamond I Bariey Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 I w ASH020280 EID630708 I I I I I I tKSKjjl 'tW ",'' '|I I I I I I I I Revised Qroundwater Flow Modal _______________________Introduction TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction,-................................"..--.---..--...............................,,,.,...--..................,3 2,0 Site Setting, Geology, and Hydrogeology.................................................................. 4 2.1 Site Setting..........,,..................................,,....,,...,,,,,,.----................,,,,.,,.,,---- 4 2.2 Geology................................,.....................................--.-....----.------.--.---4 2.3 5 Hydrogeology.............................................................................................. 3.0 Primary Data Sources....................,...,...........,..,.......,,.............................,,........----. 7 4.0 Model Set-up................................................................................................. 9 4.1 Model Domain and iMscredzation................................................,,,,...........-- 9 4.2 Boundary Conditions ....,,,,...,,.....,,,,...,,.----..............,,,,.,,,........--.--............ 10 4.2-1 No Flow Boundaries ,,.,,,,...,,..,,.,,.....,,,,...........,,.........,,,,,,,,................ 10 4.2.2 Ohio River..................................................................................... 10 4.2.3 Minor Surface Water Features.................................................... 12 4.2.4 Pumping Wells................................................................................. 13 4.3 Main Input Values......--.........,........................,,..............-...........--.............. 16 4.3.1 Hydraulic Conductivity ............................................................ 16 4.3.2 18 Recharge.............................................................................. 5.0 Groiffldwater Model Calibration ..,,.,,................,,...,......,,...,,..,--.............................. 19 5.1 Calibration Strategy....................................................................................... 19 5.2 Calibration Results................................................................................. 20 6,0 Model Results.....,.,.........,.............,.,,.,.,,.-.-.-...................,..........----................2l 6.1 MassBalaflce...,............................,........,,,.,.--................,.,..,...--"..--..............21 6.2 Current Pumping Conditions........................................................................... 21 6.3 No DuPont Pumping.......................................................................... 22 6.4 No GE Pumping.............................................................................................. 23 6.5 No Pumping by DuPont or GE................................................................. 23 6.6 No Little HocldngWA Pumping......................................................... 23 7.0 Sensitivity Analysis....................,.,.,.,,.,,.,,..................................--....--.................... 25 8.0 Model Conclusions.......,..,.,,,,.--.........................................--....--..----...--...,,,.".26 9.0 27 References..............,.......,,.,.....-- .........,,...,,........,,.,,,,..,,..............,,..,,,,--...-..--.. 74Z3WWGWM-R01^oo Jan. 7.03 Wllmlnglon, DE ASH0202B1 EID630709 Revised Oroundwaier Plow Model Introduction TABLES Table 1 Primary Data Sources for the Gtoundwater Flow Model ,..,,., ...7 Table 2 Finite-Difference Grid Vertical Discretization .................. ...9 Table 3 Table 3.
refid# VGqXbkKyBnBdGD9q3p7b9Gexp52 pages
GLP10-01-02; Interim Report 38 - Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater Samples Collected at the Former Sludge Incorporation Area (FSIA) located in Decatur, AL, November/December 2012 Study Title Analysis of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHS) and Perfluorobutane Sulfonate (PFBS) in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M Decatur Phase 3 Site-Related Monitoring Program Data Requirement EPA TSCA Good Laboratory Practice Standards 40 CFR Part 792 Study Director Jaisimha Kesari P.E., DEE Weston Solutions, Inc. 1400 Weston Way West Chester, PA 19380 P hone:610-701-3761 Author Susan W olf 3M Environmental Laboratory Interim Report Completion Date Date of signing Performing Laboratory 3M Environmental Health and Safety Operations Environmental Laboratory 3M Center, Bldg 260-05-N-17 St.
refid# poGnZM2XxQLZ78110kYM6Xo7109 pages
INTERIM REPORT #26 - Analysis of Groundwater Samples STUDY TITLE Analysis of Perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS), Perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHS), and Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in Water, Soil, Sediment, Fish, Clams, Vegetation, Small Mammal Liver and Small Mammal Serum Using LC/MS/MS for the 3M Decatur Monitoring Program DATA REQUIREMENTS EPA TSCA Good Laboratory Practice Standards 40 CFR 792 STUDY DIRECTOR Jaisimha Kesari P.E., DEE Weston Solutions, Inc. 1400 Weston Way West Chester, PA 19380 Phone: 610-701-3761 INTERIM REPORT COMPLETION DATE January 9, 2007 PERFORMING LABORATORY Exygen Research 3058 Research Drive State College, PA 16801 Phone: 814-272-1039 STUDY SPONSOR 3M Company 3M Building 0236-01-B-10 St.
refid# GKJqdnGmpQJ51MadyXB39vkKn118 pages