BACK TO MAIN SANITIZED REPORT EXPLORATORY 28-DAY ORAL TOXICITY STUDY WITH TELOMER ALCOHOL, TELOMER ACRYLATE.
refid# OE9G0q1Y3Qqkd5NJMMqpYObNj742 pages
BACK TO MAIN Centre Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 3048 Research Drive State College, PA 16801 www.centrelab.com ^P h on e : (814) 231 -8032 Fax: (814) 231 -1253 or (814) 231 -1580 Analytical Report Fluorochemical Characterization of Sediment, POTW Sludge, and Landfill Leachate Samples Columbus, GA (W2336) Centre Analytical Laboratory Report No. 023-014U (Revision 1) Revision Date 3/28/01 Testing Laboratory Centre Analytical Laboratory, Inc. 3048 Research Drive State College, PA 16801 3M Environm ental Laboratory Contact Kent R.
refid# a5v8r5p0B1Gd9Znw4JKankEy13 pages
BACK TO MAIN Executive Summary of Hydrolysis Studies 3M has completed a series of studies of the hydrolytic reactions of various fluorochemicals.
refid# 4JBVBn2MGaZk6m5aRVXO7y2Oe2 pages
A f l J2A6 SUMMARY OF A STUDY CONDUCTED WITH POTASSIUM PERFLUOROALKYL SULFONATE (PFOS) AT DUPONT Type: Species/S train: Sex/Number: Exposure Period: Frequency of Treatment: Exposure Levels: Method: Biopersistence Screening Study Rats/Crl :CDSD(IGS)BR Male/5/group 5 or 10 days; 94 days of recovery Ad libitum for 5 or 10 days Ammonium perfluorooctanoate: 20 mg/kg Potassium perfluoroalkyl sulfonate (PFOS): 10 mg/kg Six groups of rats were administered ammonium perfluorooctanoate, 1 group received the test substance for 5 consecutive days and the other 5 groups received the test substance for 10 days.
refid# RavMVooBg6b94ZJBQm1e4JOBn53 pages
Arasi& _ u s i TSCA NCIC Notification Form for CBI Documents Docket Number: fl-R ________________ Document Control Number: g j> t( Document Date: Document Type: W - ?
refid# ymkY0m56wBrYE0BKL91qarB631 page
MA&6 _ 126g TSCA NCIC Notification Form for CB!
refid# 91BdxgR8pneEE4BN4yNvVmazD1 page
AR226-1384 Revised 10-24-80* IJ _W_O_RD__P_R_O_C_E_S_SI_N_G__W_O_R_K _F_O_R_M TO: EMPLOYEE RELATIONS DEPARTMENT WORD PROCESSING CENTER - N-12533 AD O D Q ' * *** Tape# /IP2.y __ /QffJj.
refid# NEpgR8ByKym7ZrMJbz7rexEQg9 pages
tDCTD PPO - 84- e ALLEGATION OF SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE E ACTION TOXIC SUBSTANCES COVTHX ACT (TSCA) SECTION 8 ( C ) (Name of ailecer lYear of Birth IDate of receipt of allegation at site 1 1-S* 1 is-PI -- 'I 8-/SW IJoto title or description 1Sex * 1Location of plant receivina allecation lJ _ , 11 (Vm-) OC (F) 1 -, 1 t Cl L ;!
refid# Jv8daMqRvjqd9BmrKaO9Kgzoe13 pages
2 2 6 - / 7 6 ,7 Wildlife International.
refid# ympr9aEyqgm0zmEk29w79dbmV6 pages
AR226-2057 C-B PERSONAL AIR MQNXT0RIN8 SATA WASHINGTON WORKS - SPD COPOLYMERS AREA 11988) (AEL ZB 0.96 PPB) JOB NAHE/PER8 CODE NO.
refid# zov7xxOx696e7xRm2NanKyDV62 pages
AR226-2363 )i Detecting and Quantifying Low Levels of Fluoropolymer Polymerization Aids - A Guidance Document t Fluoropolym er M anufacturers G roup (FM G ) - T echnical W orking G roup (TW G ) - A n alytical W orking G roup (AW G ) T he Society o f the P lastics Industry, Inc. 1801 K Street, NW , Suite 600K W ashington, DC 20006-1301 S EXP000571 T h is p a g e le ft in te n tio n a lly b lan k .
refid# Em4zxg09garJE4R5pEn0Yza422 pages
AR226-2583 Document 12 of 25 ASH018251 EID521411 I J J C-8 PLUME IDENTIFICATION/GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT WORK PLAN DUPONT WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY AND LOCAL, LETART AND DRY RUN LANDFILLS ) Date* May 2002 Project No.; D6WW7423 A CORPORATE REMEDIATION GROUP An Alliance between DuPont and URS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 a ASH018Z52 EID521412 C-8 Plume Identlfigation/Groundwaier Assessment Work Plan Introduction TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction..................................................... ............,,................................................2 1.1 Document Organization................................................ ................ ..................... 3 2.0 Washington Works Facility................ ........................................................................ 4 2.1 Key Findings................. ............................................... ................ ..................... 4 2.2 Data Gaps................................................................................ ............ ............. 5 2.3 Summary--Recommended Activities to Fill Data Gaps................................... 5 2.4 Detailed Justification..... ....................................... ............................................. 3.0 Local Landfill.... .................................................................................... ....................... g 3.1 Key Findings..................................................................................................... 3.2 Summary-- Recommended Activities to Fill Local Landfill Data Gaps.......... 9 3.3 Detailed Justification........................... ................................................... ..........jq 4.0 Letart Landfill............................................................................................................... 4.1 Key Findings--Letart Landfill....................... .................... .................. ..........12 4.2 Data Gaps for the Letart Landfill...................................................................... 13 4.3 Summary--Recommended Activities to Fill Letart Landfill Data Gaps...... ..13 4.4 Detailed Justification ..................................................................................14 5.0 Dry Run Landfill............................................................................................. ........ 16 5.1 Key Findings--Dry Run Landfill......................................................... ........ 16 5.2 Summary--Data Gaps for the Dry Run Landfill............. ................. .........17 5.3 Summary-- Recommended Activities to Fill Dry Run Landfill Data G aps.............................. .................................................................... ........17 5.4 Detailed Justification............................... ............................................. ........17 6.0 Path Forward............................... ......................................... ........................ ....... 20 7.0 References............. ........................................ .. ....... 21 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 FIGURES Proposed Well Locations for the Washington Works Facility Proposed Well Locations for the Local T.anrfffn Proposed Well Locations for the Letart T^nrtfiit Proposed Well Locations for the Dry Run Tjwrifin APPENDIX Appendix A Sampling and Analysis Plan O-B Plume W ork PlanZrioc May. 20,02 W ilmington.
refid# qmJbRpMMjVD3pay60E8XvB9Yj28 pages
AR226-2691 13 AR226-2691 DuPont EMSE Report No. 15-03 Study Title Accelerated Biodegradation of 8-2 Telomer B Alcohol- A preliminary Screening Study j I Test Guideline This study uses the concept o f OECD Guideline for Testing o f Chepiicals; Section 3: Inherent Biodegradability (1992).
refid# jBJRbpLDN37wGy4ejZejxEYdQ48 pages
r <77 19 U U 6 -J t6 9 7 DuPont-13202 TRADE SECRET Study Title [ ]: Hydrolytic Stability o f [ ] as a Function o f pH Test Guidelines: OECD Guideline 111 Author: Bogdan Szostek, Ph.D.
refid# jyX2NL93Ld8voEM5nkZO27q235 pages
AR226-2863 Copies to t vE ' I* du Pont de Nemours and Company Haskell laboratory for Toxicology and Industrial Medicine Material Submitted by Organic Chemicals Dept., ACUTE ORAL TEST J S S T B E l* ____________ _____________ __________ lS i?
refid# mBe8Mj1YYEedj32gm7DLBq6NB3 pages