Gonzales Group Taken on September 23, 1997 Multi-Page NO. 95-04-1728-D Oral deposition 01: RAYMOND MILLE1 MANUEL P.
refid# Z8d4kzod0ExjXYz7z3BDwbqd42 pages
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA NEVADA POWER COMPANY, -v s- Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) # CV-8 9-555-LDG MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., De fendants. ) ) ) ) DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM B.
refid# 0LgKE6daooe5RGZj6ZYnNK8qm235 pages
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA NEVADA POWER COMPANY, -v s- Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) # CV-8 9-555-LDG MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., De fendants. ) ) ) ) DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM B.
refid# 6BrzKnK3BnNaXJNRREaGgJQ23235 pages
Conttnuatton ofa V&poAitton ofa E.
refid# g2r439bvYvRQKVxGKrLrgRDEG242 pages
WHAT MONSANTO CHEMICALS COMPANY KNEW ABOUT THE HAZARDS AND EFFECTS OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS By Robert Brent Cissell B.S..
refid# 6bKyx7RbNZN28pKxZ2mR5w4j1122 pages
FILE NAME: Kaiser Gypsum (KG) DATE: 1998 Nov 4 DOC#: KG050 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Legal - Deposition of Joseph Ross Hobby Pickner vs.
refid# Nd2BZB6eGV63qDoR45GxgGzg21 pages
WHAT MONSANTO CHEMICALS COMPANY KNEW ABOUT THE HAZARDS AND EFFECTS OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS By Robert Brent Cissell B.S..
refid# RJR4r71w71zn7VwkJM17kvpVv122 pages
., 7 Plaintiffs, 8 vs. 9 MONSANTO COMPANY, 10 Defendant. 11 12 STIPULATION 13 IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED 14 by and between the parties through their 15 respective counsel, that the deposition 16 of ALAN GRICE McCARTY may be taken before 17 MICKEY TURNER, Commissioner, at the 18 offices of Fite & Miller at 4th Floor 19 SouthTrust Bank Building, Anniston, 20 Alabama, on the 15th day of October, 21 1999. 22 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND 23 AGREED that the signature to and the 0002 1 reading of the deposition by the witness 2 is waived, the deposition to have the OWENS 10-15-1999 McCarty, Alan Gnce.TXT[8/22/2017 3:59:48 PM] HARTOLDMON0036243 3 same force and effect as if full 4 compliance had been had with all laws and 5 rules of Court relating to the taking of 6 depositions. 7 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND 8 AGREED that it shall not be necessary for 9 any objections to be made by counsel to 10 any questions except as to form or 11 leading questions, and that counsel for 12 the parties may make objections and 13 assign grounds at the time of the trial, 14 or at the time said deposition is offered 15 in evidence, or prior thereto. 16 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND 17 AGREED that the notice of filing of the 18 deposition by the Commissioner is waived. 19 20 21 22 23 0003 1 INDEX 2 EXAMINATION BY: PAGE NUMBER: 3 Mr.
refid# vbmdzZyen8Rp7XexDR2YOvJE140 pages
At the time that you reviewed this test, did your department, the medical department, or Monsanto Chemical Company seek to do other testing that would determine whether absorption through the skin of Aroclor products would lead to any systemic poisoning?
refid# g2V304QQJeBd9ndMyQb3odRYL149 pages
WHAT MONSANTO CHEMICALS COMPANY KNEW ABOUT THE HAZARDS AND EFFECTS OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS By Robert Brent Cissell B.S..
refid# vVrZOVvXYKL4r5B3dw4r3oMLE122 pages
^D (c * # NTP REPORT ON THE TOXICITY STUDIES OF 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE (ETHYLENE DICHLORIDE) IN F344/N RATS, SPRAGUE DAWLEY RATS, OSBORNE-MENDEL RATS, AND B6C3Fi MICE (DRINKING WATER AND GAYAGE STUDIES) NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY PROGRAM P.O.
refid# J5NeORrQryxxdajYMgOmZw1656 pages
WHAT MONSANTO CHEMICALS COMPANY KNEW ABOUT THE HAZARDS AND EFFECTS OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS By Robert Brent Cissell B.S..
refid# a4RxRbQrBQ4My0G41jG7mYkbR122 pages
STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT CO ORT MILWAUKEE COUNTY BRANCH 8 STROH DIE CASTING COMPANY, I Plaintiff, v.
refid# LoX0JzXjk4K93MDaR0G2O4Eaz116 pages
At the time that you reviewed this test, did your department, the medical department, or Monsanto Chemical Company seek to do other testing that would determine whether absorption through the skin of Aroclor products would lead to any systemic poisoning?
refid# gaXyvdqnpa1zqLen4q3J95kxJ149 pages
COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSCRIPTION 1 1 / UNITED STATES DISTRICT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 2 NORTHERN DIVISION 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 4) PLAINTIFFS, ) 5) VS. ) CAUSE NO: N87-0030C 6) MEXICO FEED AND SEED CO., ET AL, ) 7) DEFENDANTS. ) 8 9 10 DEPOSITION OF JAMES R.
refid# xjxEYnVNaEXYQ68JqynmLzwOb106 pages