- ADIETARYLCS0 STUprDoYsWITHTHEMALLARD WILDLIFE INTERSNMARTEIQOUNEASLTLTNDO., PU2R7O2J3ECT NO. 454-102 Series 8U5S0..EcEnovliorognimeantfaelcPtrostTeectsitonGAugiendceyli(nGeras) CPPSNumber 850.2200 FIFRASubdivisionB,Section 712 OECD Guideline205 AUTHORS: CSeoaunr't.nGe5ayl.laCgahseery JRaoymaBo.nBLdesvVearns Hoven STUDY INITIATION: April 21,1999 STUDY COMPLETION: April 26,2000 AMENDED REPORT DATE: Mirch 23, 2008 SUBMITTTEDO Enviro53n5M5mBeCnoutrhpaolrALavatebionorunaetory St Pu, Meson $5144 Wildlife International, Ltd.

ALBH185B ReroRTIG FACETON 130 LaboratoryReport Analytical Report of Data for PFOS Dietary LC50 Study with Mallards (Sera and Liver) : Laboratory Report No.

Regulatory needs Exchange of a PFAS containing manufacturing device (e.g. tube, filter ...) with a PFAS free alternative Introduction Many medical devices may be affected by the restriction of PFAS in different ways.

Toxicological Summary PFOS Dietary Chronic Definitive Reproductive Study: Mallard Test Substance: Perfluorooctancsulfonate (POS) Structure: 1-Octanesulfonic acid, 1,1,2.2,3,3,44,5,5.6,6,1,7,8.8.8-heptadecafluoro, potassium salt.

FPE Response to the Proposal for a General PFAS Restriction Flexible Packaging Europe (FPE) is the industry association representing the interests of more than 85 small, medium-sized and multinational manufacturers of flexible packaging.

WATER RESEARCH 41 (2007) 3823-3832 Available at www.sciencedirect.com ;' ScienceDirect journal homepage: w\cw.elsevier.com/locate/watres Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions Haiou Huang', NoHwa Leeb, Thayer Young', Amy Gary`, James C.

3sMrtFLaUcOmRnOtCrHEoMvIeCrAsLrSoUBrMiInSSwIeOsN HR226 190 | 3M FLUOROCHEMICAL SUBMISSION TOXICOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY AND MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE 2% 902). 2. 206/903 2690p. 3.

Apr 25, 2023 Comment on Proposed Restriction of PFAS Conference of Fluoro-Chemical Product Japan (FCJ) On behalf of chemical manufacturers, we, Conference of Fluoro-Chemical Product Japan (FCJ), have been working tirelessly to comply with national chemical regulations.

Materials and Design 53 (2014) 782-790 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Materials and Design journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matdes Technical Report Functional and perceptive aspects of non-stick coatings for cookware Stefano Rossi a'*, Gianpietro Gai b, Roberto De Benedetto a Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy hFaculty ofDesign and Art, Free University ofBozen, piazza Universitet 1, 39100 Hazen, Italy CrossMark ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 28 March 2013 Accepted 24 July 2013 Available online 2 August 2013 ABSTRACT In this product design study the functional and perceptive properties characterizing non-stick coatings for cookware were investigated.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management -- Volume 14, Number 3--pp. 316-334 316 Received: 26 September 2017 Returned for Revision: 16 January 2018 Accepted: 30 January 2018 Critical Review A Critical Review of the Application of Polymer of Low Concern and Regulatory Criteria to Fluoropolymers Barbara J Henry,*t Joseph P Carlin, t Jon A Hammerschmidt, f Robert C Buck,: L Heidelore Fiedler, Jennifer Seed,// and Oscar Hernandez# tWL Gore & Associates, Elkton, Maryland, USA tChemours Company, Wilmington, Delaware, USA MTM Research Centre School of Science and Technology, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden //Risk Assessment Consultant, Alexandria, Virginia, USA #Bergeson & Campbell, Washington, DC, USA William Buxton, I ABSTRACT Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of fluorinated substances that are in the focus of researchers and regulators due to widespread presence in the environment and biota, including humans, of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA).

_-- E Pro fea, Arz26-19S/ cs 5 Ry Analytical Report 3M Company AnalysisofPFOA and PFOS In WaterSamples from Oakdale Municipality 05-0243 Exygen Report No.

AR226-2048 ^ Ta-Wei Fu 07/30/2001 08:01 AM To: cc: Subject John E Crum/SE/DuPont@DuPont Ta-Wel Fu/CL/DuPont@DuPont, Roger J 2ipfel/AE/DuPont@DuPont Re: C-8 sampling D John, Maybe I did not make my points clear on the phone so I would like to clarify it here: 1.

AR226-2098 TestWgsuh"S Sarnple Date Range Conesntratlon Range Action Level Industrial Hygiime 1/1/58 1201/96 100% Sample Dt Sample 9 Duration Type Employee Name BTO: 06 LOC: 048 TEFLON B-162 OUTSIDE SMCIKING AREA - 2ND LEVEL 1/26(99 7719 380 A 1/3098 7718 360 A 2/393 7721 3SO A wigs 8019 380 A S/iBIEIB 8020 360 A BUSS 8192 24) A S/14S8 8222 360 A 6/1496 8223 380 A 9/4B6 8247 380 A 11/1688 8401 360 A Pen; Chemical 04/FC-.143 C-8/FC-143 CWC-143 M/PC-)43 C.a/FC-143 C.8/F&.143 C^/FC-143 C-a/FC-143 C-8/FC-143 C-WC-143 BTO: 08 LOC: 101 TEFLON P/8 - TPE FIELD OPERATOR (08PA) 1/3098 27147 2898 27150 360.

W.

AR226-2183 5-- >>> .y.Jt--AfTM;.