1.

Page 3673 1 It says primarily occupational exposures. 2 (Whereupon, laughter ensued.) 3 Q Which means that the source of the asbestos 4 exposure from brake linings is in an occupational 5 setting -6 A Absolutely, kidding aside. 7 Q rather than necessarily being out on the 8 street when somebody is coming to a stop at a stop 9 sign?

1 that job is plaintiff's investigation is continuing.

Page 3780 1 I am not persuaded that I ought not submit 2 that to the trier of fact. 3 As both of these cases have been presented, 4 they have been presented under two possible theories. 5 One of negligence and one of strict 6 liability.

Page 3711 1 Kaylo, and I just don't think they have any relevance 2 to the case against Ford. 3 THE COURT: Do I hear any comments?

1 was so shut down by the opacification and the tumor Page 3944 2 running, that he couldn't breathe with the fluids 3 through his lung. 4 THE LAW CLERK: Five minutes, counsel. 5 MR.

Page 3964 1 this, I thought maybe it makes some sense to see what 2 the plaintiffs' own experts had to say about the five 3 reasons that I talked about with you in opening 4 statement. 5 After all, the experts I put on are going to 6 agree with those reasons, but what I did was I went 7 back and looked at the trial transcript to see what 8 the plaintiffs' own experts had to say on these 9 points, and it is interesting, in a lot of instances 10 they agreed with those five reasons. 11 Now, I want to be very clear with you.

1 them out to begin their deliberations.

1 Q Now, you mentioned that there was an Page 1792 2 additional attempt at a thoracentesis, but was that in 3 May of 1993?

1 please.

Page 1749 1 Which would mean if you had a sugar size 2 cube of lung tissue, size of a sugar cube, and you did 3 a digestion on that and found out how much asbestos 4 was in it, you would have 20 of these asbestos bodies, 5 which would be a single asbestos fiber coated with 6 iron and protein in a single cube of tissue. 7 Most women who never had history.of exposure 8 to asbestos, we don't find any. 9 What I have always said, if I had a case of 10 an individual who had mesothelioma who had less than 11 that background, I could not attribute the 12 mesothelioma to that. 13 The problem is that I think the 14 mesothelioma, and I think this is well documented in 15 the literature, is a type of cancer caused by asbestos 16 which it takes very little asbestos to cause, and I 17 think that is well accepted, well proven. 18 So with respect to is there a safe level to 19 which a person could be exposed, I would say, 20 generally if I was in that situation, I would say no, 21 there isn't any safe level because it takes so little

1 A Yes.

Page 2191 1 that conclusion that asbestos pipecovering was a safe 2 _ occupation; am I right?

1 order.

1 you general questions first.