Page 2999 1 I want to take you a little bit further back 2 and just ask you, would you agree that, ever since 3 friction products were produced as far back as when 4 Ford made a vehicle in 1906, I believe, that asbestos 5 was the material in the brake linings and the friction 6 parts?
refid# N2z7DBgbQwYx3pvZY30KOvyNy1 page
1 Anderson involved in any of the ones that you were?
refid# dnjLj76Qkn9mZL9bQdBZE7RKQ1 page
Page 3232 1 The Federal Register in general is a 2 compilation of the words that are printed by the 3 federal bureaucracy on a given day. 4 And in this particular occurrence there was 5 a document that was put out that was labeled part two, 6 Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health 7 Administration wherein they sought to amend the 8 occupational safety and health rules for parts 1910 9 and 1926. 10 Q What this big thick document basically is is 11 a summary of OSHA's findings and an explanation of its 12 rules that they then passed and put in effect 13 regarding asbestos?
refid# 8Oqz5LOvLMqxGm1E81ERRYj9B1 page
Page 3255 1 Mr.
refid# Qkq4y62jXJ9x5xawOBbR21Kzk1 page
1 adhere to the circumference of the insulation.
refid# Jr3em4ebrYGGwGOeqkXwQwxYX1 page
Page 3325 1 A Yes, the Wicks Corporation was trying to 2 take us over. 3 During that time they reorganized, 4 recapitalized and sold a lot of the businesses off 5 and, of course, they terminated quite a few personnel 6 at that time. 7 In fact, the research center went from 8 around 1,200 to about 800 of us left, yes. 9 Q In fact, 800 people were laid off and you 10 were one of them; isn't that correct?
refid# B8RG5qeq4y0qp93je77KMkbzo1 page
Page 3342 1 Have a good safe evening, everyone. 2 (Whereupon, jury dismissed -- 4:26 p.m.) 3 THE COURT: Counsel, if you would be kind 4 enough to be in your seats at 9:25, we will resume 5 tomorrow morning at 9:30. 6 MR.
refid# da5DKMJzJb5LM9xe0J1V31Xyb1 page
1 independent samples.
refid# wqo569L3dk8Bv7MaOEZX2VaaJ1 page
Page 3198 1 A Well, an order of magnitude lower from .1 to 2 .01 is certainly consistent with the others on this 3 paper, but you are correct, yes. 4 Q In addition, Mr.
refid# gb4aO6rd1RZXdk79KEg0QMme1 page
1 .
refid# KZxQLo0x67gYxOpegpGRXvB21 page
1 mesothelioma. 2 For the general public, of course, it is 3 1.0; and for automobile repair, which means garage 4 mechanics, the risk is about .65. 5 Q Let me ask you that -- a question about 6 that. 7 That is below 1, correct?
refid# ypvjNN2OdY07yxgQzgRQjZ5o21 page
1 these cases, didn't he?
refid# G6N8j6w71xR1jEYYRnL85km8x1 page
1 Thank you very much, Dr.
refid# 37JVORYGJJqJ24x419jOQzYDx1 page
Page 3546 1 Isn't it also true that in the Teta study -- * 2 A Teta. 3 Q Teta, thank you -- the proportions or the 4 proportion, excuse me, of mesotheliomas not associated 5 with some form of asbestos exposure was about 15 6 percent?
refid# qd32rjvpnMqRp7BE6Om8mR9Dq1 page
Page 3565 1 Now, you were mentioning before -- these 2 studies, the Hong Kong study, the Finland study, these 3 are all studies, most of them done in the 1980s, 4 correct?
refid# DvRrnRydVdNm8pYQjadqMpdQ1 page