Document pmQxoy6y1w1GVKvev0gYg49w7

1. Q So -- Page 3578 2 A Not from occupational. 3 Q If I understand you correctly, ifwe have a 4 person who dies from mesothelioma and can never be 5 interviewed and has no family to interview, and we 6 don't know anything about where the person worked, and 7 the pathologist looks at the lung tissue and finds a 8 whole bunch of asbestos in the lungs, more than would 9 be expected from the background, in that situation you 10 would not relate that mesothelioma to asbestos, 11 correct? 12 A Most likely we would saythat there would be 13 a potential of occupational exposure. I am not so 14 sure about your hypothetical. 15 It is getting way off the tangent. 16 Q All I am trying to point out, Doctor, that 17 person would be listed as a nonasbestos mesothelioma 18 on the chart, right? j 19 A Which person? j 20 Q A person who has -- who could not give an ! 21 occupational history, either because they were dead or