In the case of this v i 11 Involve the necessity, I b e l i v e , of another attempt to obtain a samole of urine * for as you k n o w , in this type of lead poisoning i i-esults of the analysis of the urine are more signif m t .an the obtained on the blood.

The other question raised was the value of British Anti-Lewisite (Dimercaptopropanol) in the treatment of T.E.L. poisoning.

Bundesen, President of ths Chicago Board of Health, relative to childhood poisoning problems is that city.

I may say, h o w ever, that I consider it very unlikely that yo u have suffered any injury of a permanent sort as the result of any exposure to gasoline containing tetraethyl lead.

. , It is quite possible that the profound nerve disturbance was the result of his previous lead poisoning- in fact, we know of no other cause.

., was advised that he was suffering from lead poisoning.

I am of the opinion that your warning sign as submitted for use on tanks WARNING Contains Tetraethyl Lead Contents poisonous.

Suffice it to say at this tine, that there is nothing either in the history or present physical condition to suggest lead poisoning.

In talking to Dr.Fischbein the other evening he was very positive that this man had a minor case of tetraethyl lead poisoning.

There are at present no signs of lead poisoning.

Two men were poisoned from exposure to lead, resulting in the death of one of them and the acute illness of the second.

., Director Kettering Laboratory of Applied Physiology University of Cincinnati College of Lledieine Eden Avenue Cincinnati 19, Ohio, Dear Lob: Thank you for your letter of August 9th, regarding the childhood lead poisoning situation.

Gentlemen: r i _Sinclalr Refining Company, with whom i had correspondence abo.ut the way lead ' effects the human body; have informed me that you have some simple tests to diaari-u%XS d Poisoning,'and they also state that<they-believe that you would be glad iiddSmmeJei-nKed^i-angfnomsaitnig0 ncasoens thoefseleatdestpaoistoon- I would aooreciate this information.

Some of the more _intelligent listeners have commented upon the fact that this was the first contention that lead poisoning could be caused by an eye injury of this sort; but even these commentator^ seem to have adopted that view largely because of the personality of Dr.

LEAD INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION 420 Lexington Avenue New York 17, N.