Comment on Proposed Restriction of PFAS Aug 25, 2023 Japan Valve Manufactures' Association (JVMA) Japan Valve Manufacturers Association (JVMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the PFAS restriction proposal. 1.

Comment on Proposed Restriction of PFAS May 30, 2023 Japan Fluoropolymers Industry Association (JFIA) We, Japan Fluoropolymers Industry Association (JFIA), think that fluoropolymers should be distinguished from the proposed restriction of PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), which collectively regulates more than 10,000 of organofluorine compounds (PFAS) on the grouping basis.

Processed product for Manufacture applications Application Number: Manufacture (Annex E.2.1.)

ATTACHMENT TO LETTER TO C.AUER DATED AUGUST 31,2000 SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION N-ETFOSA N-ethylperfluorooctanesulfonamide AcuteToxicit 1.

Comment on Proposed Restriction of PFAS Aug 25, 2023 Japan Valve Manufactures' Association (JVMA) Japan Valve Manufacturers Association (JVMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the PFAS restriction proposal. 1.

Comment on Proposed Restriction of PFAS Aug 25, 2023 Japan Valve Manufactures' Association (JVMA) Japan Valve Manufacturers Association (JVMA) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to the PFAS restriction proposal. 1.

p. 1 M ~~+ CVA cc U c~ o a W ct r--~ ~ . o U o3 ). eG . . : ;' 1 ~~~

UNITED ADVANCE ENGLISH COP Y NATIONS P.

ADVANCE UNEDITED DRAFT p. 1 AR oq a6_ 36/1 DRAFT RISK PROFILE OUTLINE EXECUTIVE SUMMAR Y I INTRODUCTION 1 .1 Chemical Identity of the proposed substance Mention who has made the proposal and when Spell out the specific chemical identity and particular considerations related to that 1 .2 Conclusion of the POP Review Commi tt ee of Annex D information "POP RC has evaluated Annex D (add reference to the meeting and the decision) information and has concluded that . . . " 1 .3 Data source s short overview of the data sources provided by the proposing Party and/or used by the POP RC in Annex D screenin g short overview of data submitted by Parties and observers (NB : a more elaborated summary of the submissions may be provided as a separate POP RC INF document) information on availability of national and international assessment reports ; [1 .4 Summary of available risk informatio n brief summary of the submitted evaluations and other information referred to in Annex E, point f Alternatively, can be summarised in a separate POP RC INF document ] 1 .5 Status of the chemical under international convention s 2 SUMMARY INFORMATION RELEVANT FOR THE RISK PROFILE 2.1 Sources production, trade, stockpiles uses releases to the environment 2 .2 Environmental fate Further elaboration of information referred to in Annex D, paragraphs (b) - (d) ; based on all relevant available information Monitoring data available integrated under the subheading or alternatively dealt with under separate heading "Monitoring data" Could be split in : 2 .2 .1 Persistence 2 .2.2 Bioaccumulatio n 2 .2 .3 Long range environmental transpo rt 000222 p. 2 y 2.3 Exposure Summary of relevant information concerning exposure in local areas (both near the source and in remote areas) Summary of relevant information concerning exposure as a result of LRET Information on bioavailability 2.4 Hazard assessment for endpoints of concer n Further elaboration of information referred to in Annex D, paragraph (e) ; based on all relevant available information Monitoring data on effects include d 3 SYNTHESIS OF THE INFORMATIO N synthesis of the information under chapter 2 tha t focus on information that is leading to the conclusive statement under chapter 4 4 CONCLUDING STATEMEN T Is the chemical likely, as a result of LRET, to lead to significant adverse human health and/or environmental effects, such that global action is warranted Note : No Annexes ; all other data provided as POP RC INF documents Target size not longer than 20 page s 2 000223

JP4EE Annex 9 Unfeasibility of other possible substitutes in actual EEE - Review of "possible substitutes" in ChemSEC Guide As of 22 September 2023 Note: The applications of PFAS in EEE have not been investigated in the dossier in details, and possible alternatives described in the dossier is very few.

Assogomma comments on the Annex XV Dossier of the universal PFAS restriction proposal September, 6th 2023 1 1.

FTor:om: "BLeatutryaBoVraonschRo@uamswastear.s@tcaotdm>reusp SDuabtjee:ct: PWeFdO,ADec 26, 2007 10:A23 Hope you re enjoying tha holidays.

~ "( l`~ 3` _p( 1I ~ ~ "McCrea, Deborah" <mccrea@taftlaw .com> 08/13/2009 02 :41 PM To cc bcc Subject NCIC OPPT@EP,A "Bilott, Robert A."

Taft/ Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP . 425 Walnut Street, Suite T800 /Cincinnati, OH 45202-3957 /Tel : 513 .381 .2838 /Fax : 513 .381 .0205 /www .taftlaw.com Cincinnati /Cleveland /Columbus /Dayton /Indianapolis /Northern Kentucky /Phoenix /Beijing ROBERT A.

e ehponi,ne.org Al226-354p7t EHENAVLITRHONMENTAL PERSPECTIVES Accumulation and Clearance of PFOA in Current and Former Residents of an Exposed Community Ryan Seals, Scott M.