PFAS Restriction Proposal Presented by: Audun Heggelund, Norwegian Environment Agency 1 Restriction proposal - content REACH = Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals Restriction proposal: Chemical identity Hazards, risks, effects Applications Availability of alternatives Socio-economic analysis - impact assessment 2 Preparation May - July 2020 Call for evidence July 2021 - Oct 2021 2nd stakeholder consultation Oct 2021 - Jan 2023 Drafting of proposal Stakeholder interviews, literature search, meetings Jan 2020 First meeting 13 January 2023 Submission of proposal 7 February 2023 Publication of proposal 3 Restriction process - next steps Public Consultation, 22 March - 25 September 2023 ECHA's scientific committees: Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) Decision by the Commission together with the member states, expected 2025/26 4 Next steps - key messages Dossier amendments are made on the basis of information submitted to the Public Consultation Well-substantiated scientific evidence is key: Alternatives, impacts (costs and benefits), missed uses, tonnages and emissions, R&D efforts, etc.

AR226-2910 FOR DP PONT USE ONLY Copies to Haskell E.

AR226-2925 FOR DU FONT USE ONLY REVISED REPORT Copies to E.

.0 3 Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs GB F-gas Review - update GB F-gas Review Objectives Domestic commitment for net zero Compliance with our international obligations Supporting wider government aims Progress Ongoing policy development and supporting analysis Next steps Draft consultation with proposals for changes Launch consultation Government response Legislate for changes Implement GB new F-gas Regulation Text in footer 2 .0 3 Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs Defra 2023 Industry Survey Why An Industry Survey Defra has to set a phasedown schedule This needs to Be tailored to the GB market while recognising interdependencies Be technically and economically feasible Allow adequate gas for important uses such as the heat pump rollout while providing sufficient regulatory certainty to make investments Any decision we make has to be evidence-based Text in footer 4 What We Need To Know We have identified the most significant differences in assumptions between current modelling and ko Recherche modelling These are Commercial Refrigeration (7.5kW to 20kW) Industrial DX (20kW - 100kW) Residential Heat Pumps (including air to air, <12kW) Small VRF Systems (~ 50kW) We need industry input to fill in the gaps Text in footer 5 Ensuring Confidentiality The survey will be Confidential Anonymous We use Qualtrics: www.Qualtrics.com This provides a high level of data security and is GDPR compliant Used by government for creating secure online surveys that handle sensitive data.

rr mM MM --M | HR RA6_ 3222 404 TRADE SECRET Study Title 'H-24768: Subchronic Toxicity WithOne9Ge0n-eDraaytiGoanvaRgeeprSotduudcytiinonRaEtvsaluations Volume dof 5 Laboratory Projct ID: DuPont 5990 ARaa6 - 3422 Duron TEST GUIDELINES: U.S.

or for litigation.

Hi That is a very good question, the best I have been able to find on the HSE website is this: https://www.hse.gov.ukireach/restrictions.htm HSE are the competent authority for UK Reach so everything is run by them If you haven't already, it is worth signing up for their newsletter, the link is on this page: https://ww,v.hse.gov.uk/reach/index.htm If you have detailed questions then the best contact is the HSE helpdesk on this email: 11111Vhse.gov.uk I hope this helps.

TestingResults:Air-WatoPrartitioCnoefficie(nKtAw) for PFOS AIRIWATER PARTITION COEFFICIENT TEST SUBSTANCE Identity:Perfluorooctanseulfonatem;ay alsobe referretdoas PFOS or FC-95. (1-Octanesulfoniaccid,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8heptadecafluoro-p,otassium saltC,AS # 2795-39-3) Remarks: The testsubstance isa whitepowder.

4 I il PFOS: A 48-Hour StaticAcute ToxicityTeSt with the Cladoceran (Daphnia magna) ACUTE TOXICITY TO AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES (E.G.

Uterefmt ctfcoy os 3m qtha i of of iron dered 1,1,1,22,45,55-nonafluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl )-3pentanone Combe 567104 Caste 56738 1 CosssteincPaBTiaseosmnrs | PBT assessment Sontper sess sma Adrministative data PBT assessment: overal result fe ttn: esp artPaIT CIantcesrtomsteosmrtgomcaehsmroceppbcasrr ofmoemree mGaernt 7oeas eph PhOTtc tr scewi stsep rae errataesssernhGcoto2ys7a4amtionpt InC sw c ao sic ncm htrt PETtnc ce n tun Ei inn ces hart,bo tre ct ETH nics pemriitoe aoohe dTe Sivaenni3sifoomsgotned2srowehrch obtvsboosrsodr 00+ SEGHA TRocroatto eio csTthoechacmaacnnhaoOttt4eoGntereeoptteothbPoepvtoo5 ao i 4 fRrmoanttoneoesearankeopoefe3s fnorea a8e 1SCH ) cepipt TpcIr.

Parker Hannifin Corporation Precision Cooling Business Unit Dale R.

-- .. - -- .-.-.-.-.-.-.-..- .- .-.-.-..-....- - - hi,-,lhevels)fparticulatmeatter.The Environmenta IQualityBoard of Puerto izicohas statedthatCata fio(an industrializeadrea) has a historyof exceeding @atit)naAlmbient Air QualityStandards.The Hea lthDepartment of Puerto Rict)has reportedthe highestratesof respiratoriyllnessesand alltypesof ::inccrisn thismunicipalityU.sing theEPA standardsampling methodology, 1,)tasluspended particles(TSP) and particulatmeatter of lessthan 10 @Lm @P\110)were collectedinCatafioand Fajardo(controlarea)foreach season of the year.The particulatmeatterfrom the air filterasnd from reference ,tandardmaterial(SRM 1649. urban dust)Were extractedsequentiallywith threseolventosfdifferentpolaritieussing 24-hour SoxhietextractionT.he extractsobtained were testedfor cytotoxicitoyn human keratinocytesusing the NeutralRed Bioassay (NRB).

FC-17-R Submitted to: BIOSEARCH, INC.

Baim RTSRRTEASRA, SERA Ee wn - x Uwt R man tw11 4Rfeer 1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4(trifluoromethyl)pentane Comber Cmte Ee : Clsstcatin abl P37 sssament | SP01BTPaarssssesssmenstry Administrative data PBT assessment; overal result == Name em eey iiiazassssssnteenstd.