- COM: Maybe can reflect for an upcoming workshop/meeting with SMEs - CEFIC: we cannot see how criticality/necessity for health or safety could simplify assessments, can probably only be used for limited cases of clearly essential (e.g. prioritised for a faster decision-making on authorisations) and clearly non-essential (although it may lead to court cases and not to speed up the process). - CEFIC: Examples helpful also here.

To address these challenges, our recommendations include the following key aspects: Foster research and development of alternatives Place strategic focus on substitution material research, demand reduction, closed- loop approaches Incentivize PFAS-free leading industries in Europe We, the European RTOS, stand ready to support regulators with independent advice or verification.

4/26/2024 WP responsible for keeping deadline WP that need to deliver Universal PFAS restriction Overall Timeline and Important Milestones ECHA FFF restriction Scope Scope defined for RoI (exclusion WP2 and possible E-use WPW7P) 2 and WP7 Scope defined for Annex XV report (ongoing assessments can still lead to changes in scope i.e. substances/substance groups to be excluded, uses to be derogated etc.) 2nd round CfE Call for Evidence for specific information (15.

Inspection ID Mechanical Integrity Test Form US Environmental Protection Agency - Region 4 Underground Injection Control Program 61 Forsyth Street SW, MC 9T25, Atlanta, Georgia, 30303 EPA Well ID#: K Y S 0 0 9 N O N E Year-Month-Day: 2 0 2 3 - 0 9 - 1 9 EPA Permit # (or RA): N O N E Phone: (404)562-9424 KY 111143 Page 1 Of 2 Inspector(s): _C_a__rl_W___e_ll_e_r______________________ (lead),__________________________________ Start Time: _1_0__:3__7____ ____________________________________, ____________________________________ End Time: _1_1__:4__7____ Facility Contact Information Facility Name:_L_o_g__s_d_o_n__V__a_l_le__y__O_i_l______________________________________________________________________ Street Address:__1_0_5__B__e_d_f_o_r_d__C__o_u__rt_____________________________________________________________________ City: _H__o_r_s_e__C__a_v_e___________________ County: H__e_a__r_t _________________________ State:_K__Y_.____ Zip: _4_2__7_4_9___ Nature of Business: _O__il__P_r_o_d__u_c_t_io__n______________________________________________________________________ Facility Owner/Operator: _C__h_a_r_l_e_s_S__t_in_s_o__n_________________________________ Phone: _2_7_0__-7__8_6_-_2_6_6_3___________ Email: _e_s_t_i_n_s_o_n_@___s_c_rt_c_.

States should be the lead in preparing for, mitigating against, and responding to disasters.

The facility representative claims that he has been in correspondence with the city of Byram to have a sewage line installed along the road leading to the facility so that it can be connected.

Weller _ (lead), , EPA Well ID#: F L S Year-Month-Day: 2 0 2 EPA Permit # (or RA): Carol Chen 1 1 30 05 0 3 -03 -28 FL I 0020 Page 1 Of 2 Start Time: 10:07 am End Time: 10:15 am Facility Name: Street Address: City: Black Creek Energy, LLC 4940 Blackjack Plant Rd.

Inspection ID Class I and II Well Inspection Form US Environmental Protection Agency - Region 4 Underground Injection Control Program 61 Forsyth Street SW, MC 9T25, Atlanta, Georgia, 30303 Phone: (404)562-9424 Inspector(s): Carol Chen _ (lead), , EPA Well ID#: F L S Year-Month-Day: 2 0 2 EPA Permit # (or RA): Carla Foy 1 1 30 4 -05 F L I 0 Page 1 Start Time: End Time: 05 0 - 01 0 2 0 Of 2 1:14 pm 1:17 pm Facility Contact Information Facility Name: Street Address: City: Black Creek Energy, LLC 4940 Blackjack Plant Rd.

Contrary to what the Dossier Submitters indicate in the PFAS Restriction Proposal, there is a range of PFAS substances, including various fluorinated gases, that are not bioaccumulative (B), not toxic (T), not (v-)persistent (not P/vP) and do not degrade to vP substances (incl. trifluoroacetic acid - TFA) in amounts leading to their risk characterisation as non-threshold substances with properties similar to PBT/vPvB substances.With respect to the above-mentioned UNEP EEAP 2022 Assessment Report statement, the same would apply to the inclusion of TFA, with a two-carbon chain and a single CF3 group, in a class (i.e., grouping) with longer chain PFAS (e.g., PFOS).

Duties Lead Inspector Inspector Title: EPCRA Inspection Report Document Number: AEBFORM-EPCRA-002-R1 Effective Date: January 24, 2020 Project Name: C.B.

Weller _ (lead), , EPA Well ID#: F L S Year-Month-Day: 2 0 2 EPA Permit # (or RA): 1 1 3 - F L Page 3 0 0 3 I 0 1 05 9 -2 8 0 0 3 Of 2 Carol Chen Start Time: 11:05 am End Time: 11:13 am Facility Name: Street Address: City: Black Creek Energy, LLC 4940 Blackjack Plant Rd.

David Kinney, Process Lead (Enhancers), Kraft Heinz Contact Email Address: Sarah Organ - sarah.organ@kraftheinz.com Purpose of Inspection: Baghouse and Scrubber Inspection Facility Type: Food Manufacturing Facility Name: Kraft Heinz Company Facility Location: 1701 W Bradley Ave, Champaign, IL 61821 Date of Inspection: May 2, 2025 Regulations Central to Inspection: Facility operations are subject to SIP/permit (FESOP).

Reg. 38,977 (July 5, 2011), requires that Valero submit an Annual Emissions Statement to LDEQ consisting of an inventory of the Facility's actual emissions and the permitted emissions limits of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrous oxides (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead (Pb), particulate matter of 10 microns or less (PM10) and 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5), and ammonia.

If broken pieces of equipement could not be replaced during the lifespan of the process installation, it puts the production of many chemicals and pharmaceuticals at risk and could lead to a shutdown of installations.

Based on its typical addition of 0.5% in engineering plastics, if the use of PTFE anti drip agents is prohibited, it will directly lead to a decrease in the flame retardancy of engineering plastics to 2-3 million tons, causing significant losses to human life and property.