ft EA~UnitedStata; ~ Environmental Protettion ~I" Agency Region 6 Compliance Assurance and Enforcement Division INSPECTION REPORT Inspection Date(s): Media: Regulatory Program(s) April 25, 2017 Water CWA 308[A][B] Company Name: Facility Name: Facility Physical Location: (city, state, zip code) Mailing address: (city, state, zip code) County/Parish: Facility Contact: Jicarilla Apache Utility Authority Dulce Wastewater Treatment Plant 290 Narrow Gauge Road Dulce, New Mexico 87528 P.O.

.

Region 6 Compliance Assurance and Enforcement Division INSPECTION REPORT Inspection Date(s): Media: Regulatory Program(s) 04/30/2018 Water Brine - CWA Company Name: Facility Name: Facility Physical Location: (city, state, zip code) Mailing address: (city, state, zip code) County/Parish: Facility Contact: Migwis Operating, LLC Bowen 36.724163N, -96.694542W Burbank, Oklahoma 74633 1800 South Little Cushing, Oklahoma 74023 Osage Brian Jones 918-223-5175 FRS Number: Identification/Permit Number: Media Number: NAICS: SIC: N/A OKU000865 N/A 21111 1311 Personnel participating in inspection: Kent W.

Region 6 Compliance Assurance and Enforcement Division INSPECTION REPORT Inspection Date(s): Media: Regulatory Program(s) 08/13/2018 Water CWA Company Name: Facility Name: Facility Physical Location: (city, state, zip code) Mailing address: (city, state, zip code) County/Parish: Facility Contact: City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Wastewater Treatment plant 45 Blackfoot Road Carlsbad, New Mexico Post Office Box 1569 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221-1569 Eddy Joe Harvey Wastewater Superintendent wastewater@cityofcarlsbadnm.com FRS Number: Identification/Permit Number: Media Number: NAICS: SIC: 110014410262 NM00226395 N/A 221320 4952 Personnel participating in inspection: Joe Harvey City of Carlsbad Joshua Lawson City of Carlsbad David Esparza USEPA Wastewater Superintendent Wastewater Collection Supervisor Environmental Engineer 575-887-5412 575-499-9791 505-366-8402 EPA Lead Inspector Signature/Date DAVID ESPARZA Digitally signed by DAVID ESPARZA DN: c=US, o=U.S.

FILE NAME: Neighborhood Exposures (NE) DATE: 2015 DOC#: NE001 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Medical Journal Abstract - Mesothelioma in Quebec and Canada From: "Huff, James (NIH/NIEHS) [G]" <huffl@niehs.nih.gov> Date: March 14, 2015 at 8:31:40 PM EDT Subject: Malignant Mesothelioma in Quebec Canada From 1984 to 2007, Projections From 2008 to 2032 incidence of Malignant Mesothelioma of the Pleura in Quebec and Canada From 1984 to 2007, and Projections From 2008 to 2032 Alfreda Krupoves, PhD ,1 Michel Camus, PhD ,2 and Louise De Gui re, MDl,2 lDirection des risques biologiques et de la sant au travail, institut national de sant publique du Quebec, Quebec, Canada 2Departement de sant environnementale et sant au travail, Universit deMontreal, Quebec, canada Background continuous increase in male incidence of malignant mesothelioma of the pleura (MMP) despite the drop of asbestos production since 1980 in Quebec motivated this study aiming to assess when the rates of MMP will decli ne.

Study on the feasibility of applying extended producer responsibility to micropollutants and microplastics emitted in the aquatic environment from products during their life cycle Module 2 - Applicability of EU legislation for implementation of EPR FINAL REPORT December 2019 June 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STUDY OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE EurEau commissioned a study to assess the potential applicability and relevance of extended producer responsibility (EPR) in order to develop clear policy guidance to address emissions of micropollutants and microplastics from products.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management -- Volume 14, Number 3--pp. 316-334 316 Received: 26 September 2017 Returned for Revision: 16 January 2018 Accepted: 30 January 2018 Critical Review A Critical Review of the Application of Polymer of Low Concern and Regulatory Criteria to Fluoropolymers Barbara J Henry,*t Joseph P Carlin, t Jon A Hammerschmidt, f Robert C Buck,: L Heidelore Fiedler, Jennifer Seed,// and Oscar Hernandez# tWL Gore & Associates, Elkton, Maryland, USA tChemours Company, Wilmington, Delaware, USA MTM Research Centre School of Science and Technology, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden //Risk Assessment Consultant, Alexandria, Virginia, USA #Bergeson & Campbell, Washington, DC, USA William Buxton, I ABSTRACT Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of fluorinated substances that are in the focus of researchers and regulators due to widespread presence in the environment and biota, including humans, of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA).

VCaearnoodlPCAoor.ipLooranaytteWeD,dMaPHDoctor SM Medical oparmant SpCean,tri,NBu5k5d1n4g40-212000006-4-08 5511773333 90609646 FOafnc caley@mmmcom April 28, 2014 Attention Docket Number EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0138 `The 3M Company appreciates the opportunity to submit commenotns the draft "Health Effects Document for Perfluorooctanic Acid (PFOA)".

FILE NAME: Mead (MEAD) DATE: 2010 Sept 3 DOC#: MEAD001 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Memo W E WASHINGTON & ERNSTER.PLLC M ickey L.

FILE NAME Allied Signal Bendix ASB DATE 2013 Jan 31 DOC ASB131 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Recommended Industrial Hygiene Practices for Asbestos Honeywell HSE Management System Level 2 Standard Industrial Hygiene Industrial Asbestos - - Document Owner Approved By Issue Date Effective Date Rev. # & Date Standard # Al Shaw Mike Csedrik September 30 2010 January 31 2013 01 January 31 2013 HSEMS 369 1.0 APPLICABILITY 1.1 This procedure is applicable to all Honeywell organizations and majority owned subsidiaries worldwide where asbestos containing materials ACM are present It establishes minimum requirements that must be met by all organizations 1.2 In addition to complying with the requirements established by this procedure organizations must ensure that they are in compliance with all applicable national state and local legal requirements Country Requirements 1.3 Each applicable Honeywell site or organization must customize this procedure or use the Corporate approved SBG's equivalent procedure to establish a specific Operations and Maintenance Plan - See Attachment 6.1 that meets all applicable Country Requirements The O Plan will remain in effect until all ACM has been removed from the facility 1.4 Each Honeywell site or organization must review and revise its procedure to eliminate any conflicts with Country Requirements and to add any Country Requirements not included in this procedure 1.5 To the extent that the requirements of a Honeywell Procedure exceed the applicable Country Requirements and do not conflict with them the more demanding requirements of the Honeywell Procedure shall apply 1.6 Whenever a Honeywell Procedure is more stringent than the applicable national state and local regulations the Honeywell Procedure shall apply 1.7 Honeywell organizations that have determined that this procedure is not applicable to them do not need a site procedure on this topic The organization must document in its SAT the rationale for determining that this procedure is not applicable 2.0 OVERVIEW 2.1 This standard covers asbestos within Honeywell facilities and is intended to assure that potential ACM risks are identified evaluated and controlled 2.2 Honeywell employees shall not remove or disturb ACM at customer facilities and shall avoid work practices which are likely to release asbestos fibers Examples of such work practices may include work in ceiling plenum areas where ACM is deteriorated or breaking away and removal of ceiling tiles which have fallen ACM debris on the upper surfaces 2.3 Contract personnel who work with asbestos in Honeywell facilities are required to follow this procedure during abatement projects facility renovations maintenance repairs demolition facility closure and emergencies 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Definitions for underlined text are found at the end of this document CAUTION 'Honeywell International Inc 2013 Copy printed on February 21 2013.

FILE NAME Talc TALC DATE 2014 DOC TALC169 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Govt Report - Stimuli to the Revision Process of Asbestos Testing in USP Talc 5 40 Stimuli to the Revision Process Modernization of Asbestos Testing in USP Talc Page 1 of 21 STIMULI TO THE REVISION PROCESS Stimuli articles do not necessarily reflect the policies of the USPC or the USP Council of Experts Modernization of Asbestos Testing in USP Talc Lawrence H.

FILE NAME Talc TALC DATE 2018 Jan 16 DOC TALC182 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Website Article - Baby Powder Battles - & Internal Documents Reveal Asbestos Worries Home * Contact Us Donate Thursday January 18 2018 FairWarning News of safety health and corporate conduct news of safety health and corporate conduct Home FairWarning Investigates FairWarning Reports Donate About FairWarning Commentary e Archive Home a _ Browse Home > 2018 > January > Baby Powder Battles Johnson & Johnson Internal Documents Reveal Asbestos Worries Search this site _.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 SAM NUNN ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Jane Graham Craig 915 Quail Valley Drive, Brentwood, Tennessee 37027 Re: Supplemental Information Request Pursuant to Section 208(a) Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7542(a) Dear Jane Graham Craig: Pursuant to Section 208(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), 42 U.S.C. 7542(a), you are hereby required to provide the U.S.

U.S.

From: "Getto, Leila" <leila_getto@ios.doi.gov> To: "Swink, Suzanne" <Suzanne.Swink@bp.com> Subject: Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 17:01:58 +0000 Importance: Normal kate's assistant ...