-_-- oDwupree1s530:2 Study Tide Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate: Age Effect on the PFOA Plasma Concentration in Post-Weaning Rats Following Oral Gavage "TEST GUIDELINES: None applicable AUTHOR: Paul M.

AR226-2109 ,;;^ri^^^;.;.;"^-;-'-.^"^~-"'-^2W^fl<i-aiK?

AR226-2257 ,y Steven H Swearingen 02/20/2002 09:43 AM To: Debbie J Mu I rooney/AE/DuPontSDuPont cc: Robert F Pinchot/DEV/AE/DuPont@DuPont.

AR226-2287 ^ Hobert L Ritchey ' 05/23/200211:24 AM To: cc: Subject M.

AR226-2358 DRAFT PHASE II MONITORING/SAMPLING WORK PLAN DUPONT WASHINGTON WORKS SITE WASHINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA Date: March 2004 Project No.: 507423 18983990.04006 18983992.04006 CORPORATE REMEDIAT10N GROUP An Alliance between DuPont and URS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 EXP000387 Draft Document Do Not Cite or Quote, March 30, 2004 Draft Phase II Monitoring/Sampling Work Plan____ _____ ______Table Of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 1 Introduction....................--...............................--...,........--................--..................... 2.0 Background Information............................................................................................ 3 3.0 Air Modeling Verification Study............................................................................... 5 3.1 Phase II Air Monitoring Activity...................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Air Sampling Events, Duration and Locations.................................... 5 3.1.2 Number of Samples ............................................................................. 5 3.1.3 Sampling Equipment, Methods and Schedule..................................... 6 3.1.4 3.1.5 3.1.6 3.1.7 3.1.8 Analytical Methods..............................................................................6 Meteorological Monitoring.................................................................. 7 Meteorological Data..........................--............................................... 7 Model Selection and Methodology...................................................... 8 Receptor Selection.........--................................................................... 8 3.2 Progress Reports and Results --.........................................................................8 4.0 Water Monitoring Activities...................................................................................... 9 4.1 Private Water Sources..........................;............................................................ 9 4.1.1 West Virginia: GIST Conclusions and Recommendations For 4.1.2 West Virginia Private Water Supply Sources...................................... 9 West Virginia: Private Water Supply Sources Activities.................. 10 4.1.3 Ohio: GIST Conclusions and Recommendations for Ohio Private Water Supply Sources........................................................... 11 4.1.4 Ohio: Private Water Supply Sources Activities................................. 12 4.2 Public Water Sources...................................................................................... 13 4.2.1 West Virginia: GIST Conclusions and Recommendations for 4.2.2 West Virginia Public Water Supply Sources..................................... 13 West Virginia Public Water Supply Sources Activities.................... 13 4.2.3 Ohio: GIST Conclusions and Recommendations for Ohio 4.2.4 4.2.5 Public Water Supply Sources............................................................ 14 Ohio Public Water Supply Sources Activities................................... 14 Ohio: OEPA Recommended Well Installation at Little Hocking Water Association Well Field............................................. 15 5.0 Surface Water and Groundwater Monitoring........................................................... 17 6.0 Surface Soil/Biota (Vegetation) Sampling............................................................... 18 7.0 Schedule and Reporting...................................................................--.---......--...... 20 8.0 21 References.......................................................................................................... 2004WorkPlan4.doc Wilmington, DE EXP000388 I Draft Document Do Not Cite or Quote, March 30, 2004 Draft Phase II Monitoring/Sampling Wori< Plan Table of Contents Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 TABLES, Summary Data for Proposed Sampling Locations In and Around DuPont Washington Works Site Summary of GIST Private Water Source Sampling Recommendations Summary of GIST Public Water Source Sampling Recommendations Figure 1 Figure 1.5 Figure 2 Figure 2A Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 FIGURES Offsite Monitoring Locations Near the Washington Works Facility/Local Landfill in West Virginia and Ohio OVSTube Offsite Monitoring Locations Near the Dry Run Landfill in West Virginia Wind Rose - DuPont Washington Works Offsite Monitoring Locations Near the Letart Landfill in West Virginia Public Water Source Monitoring Locations in West Virginia and Ohio Proposed Locations of the Four Shallow Wells at the Little Hocking Well Field Washington Works MOU Schedule Appendix A APPENDICES Phase II Quality Assurance Project Plan, DuPont Washington Works Site, Washington, West Virginia 2004WorkPlan4.doc Wilmington, DE EXP000389 Draft Document Do Not Cite or Quote, March 30, 2004 Draft Phase II Monitoring/Sampling Wo* Plan ______ ________ Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Phase n Monitoring/Sampling Work Plan (Work Plan) is referenced as Appendix 5 in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and E.

AR226-3327 Surface Protection Solutions 6-May-2004 Company SanFtfzed.

StudyTitle AnalyticLaalboratorRyeporton PresencaendConcentratioofn Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonatien Serum and Liver of Sprague-Dawley' Rats Exposed to PFOS viaGavage REPORT AMENDMENT NO.

AR226-3328 Supply Chain Team Surface Protection Solutions 4-June-2004 Company Saniti DuPont Confidential Telomers Supply Chain Summ Carpet Textile Nonwovens Leather AFFF (fire fighting) Coatings additives MPQfi^Surface Protection Solutions Company Sanitiz DuPont Confidential Objectives e Develop a baseline of understanding of impurity profile of our Telomer Products Intermediates 'flUrONRSurface Protection Solutions IDompmir ftmmze DuPont Confidential | | Agenda | UPR] surface Protection Solutions: CompanSniized.oss ect SSCACB DuPont Confidential 4 June 2004 Acknowledgments Comixny Snllfc<l.

August 21: 2000 Document Processing Center (`7407) Office of Pollution, Prevention and Toxics U.S.

36-6~ 9 p. 1 ti, C.

Katherine E .

ANTONIA TOLBERT, et al. v.

Challenges in Processing Bitumens and Heavy Oils Zhiming Fan, Parviz Rahimi, Teclemariam Alem National Centre for Upgrading Technology, Devon, Alberta, Canada, T9G 1A8 Introduction The volume of oil in place in the various deposits of oil sand in Alberta is estimated at 1.7 trillion barrels, of which 174 billion barrels is recoverable using existing technology.

Downloaded from oem.bmj.com on 17 June 2009 Malignant pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas in former miners and millers of crocidolite at Wittenoom, Western Australia G Berry, N H de Klerk, A Reid, G L Ambrosini, L Fritschi, N J Olsen, E Merler and A W Musk Occup.

Lymphohematopoietic Malignancies and Oil Exploitation in KoprivnicaKrizevci County, Croatia DAVORKA GAZDEK, MD, MSC, MARIJA STRNAD, MD, PHD, JADRANKA MUSTAJBEGOVIC, MD, PHD, ZLATKA NEMET-LOJAN, MD To determine lymphohematopoietic malignancy incidence rates between populations living near oilgas fields (two regions) compared with those living in areas free from oil-gas exploitation (one region) in KoprivnicaKrizevci County, Croatia, 803 new cases of lymphohematopoietic malignancies were studied for two time periods: 19711980 (prior to oilgas exploitation) and 19812000 (during oilgas exploitation).