6170 Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 1994 / Rules and Regulations except thoee (ufaetaocee which have exposure Order Noe. 12-71 (36 FR 8754), 6-76 (41 FR limits listed in Tables Z-l, Z--2 and Z-3 of 25059), 9-83 (46 FR 35736), Or 1-90 (55 FR 28 CFR 1910.1000.

C 355/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.98 Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Strategy for the phaseout of CFCs in metered-dose inhalers (98/C 355/02) COM(1998) 603 final CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1.Decision IX/19 of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol requires Parties requesting essential use nominations for chlorofluorocarbons CFCs for metered-dose inhalers (MDI) to present to the Ozone Secretariat an initial national or regional transition strategy if possible by 31 January 1998, and in any case by 31 January 1999.

KAISER GYPSUM's non-pursuit o f its 23 burdensomeness objections remains contingent on continued realization o f the 24 agreements reached at the May 15. 1997, meeting. 25 KAISER GYPSUM also stated other objections to the subject Plaintiffs' Standard 26 Interrogatories during the course of the proceedings leading to their adoption.

This work further strengthens the Company's position as a premier, leading-edge environmental consulting services provider.

ORIGINAL STATEMENT Subject to and without waiving its current or future special appearances Defendant Kaiser any Gypsum makes this preliminary statement and objections Defendant Kaiser Gypsum currently has special appearance motions pending in twelve cases involving over 100 plaintiffs in Dallas County Eight of these cases involve numerous plaintiffs who are Oregon or Washington residents Each and every objection response ormatter contained in these amended responses and answers is made strictly subject to and without waiving any pending special appearance motion To the extent that Kaiser Gypsum is named and served as a party in future cases venued in Dallas County these interrogatory responses shall also be subject to and without waiving any future special appearance motions Defendant Kaiser Gypsum expressly objects to each and every discovery request to the extent that it seeks any information in those cases wherein a special appearance is pending requests are not related to any to lead to the discovery of appearance hearing for the reason that such discovery special appearance motion or likely evidence admissible in a special Defendant Kaiser Gypsum also is involved in four cases involving plaintiffs who are Dallas residents in which Kaiser - _ Gypsum's special appearance motion has been denied Kaiser Gypsum objects to each and every discovery request to the extent it is unrestricted as to time and geography on the grounds that such requests are unreasonably burdensome and not reasonably related to discovery of evidence related to such claims Kaiser Gypsum records disclose that it made some sales of two containing products to customers located in Texas from 1961-71 See response to Interrogatory No. 6 infra Kaiser Gypsum's responses herein are limited to Therefore information concerning products manufactured by Kaiser Gypsum during that time period Kaiser Gypsum has not conducted manufacturing or sales operations in the United States since 1978 some fourteen years ago All Kaiser Gypsum facilities that manufactured products including some containing products were sold to non- affiliated third parties Accordingly Kaiser Gypsum has no current employees with detailed personal knowledge concerning its former production and sales of containing products particularly with reference to any products that could be the subject of lawsuits in Dallas County The responses herein are based on review of retained Kaiser Gypsum records and information provided by former Kaiser Gypsum employees In this connection it DEFENDANT'S AMENDED RESPONSES AND ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS MASTER SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION PAGE 3 should be noted that Kaiser Gypsum has not been sued in Texas in asbestos injury cases until recently and consequently research in company records related to Texas sales was begun only recently Kaiser Gypsum has and will continue to use its best efforts to provide answers based knowledge of former employees who on its current knowledge the are accessible to it and such company records and documents as have been retained Kaiser Gypsum will supplement these responses on a continuing basis as additional information becomes available to it in the course of further research into company records and upon inquiry of former Kaiser Gypsum employees who may be knowledgeable on any of the subject areas B.

Roofing/Asphalt The Rooting, Asphalt business segment's strategy is to further enhance the Company's position as the leading manufacturer of residential rooting products in the U.S.

Utilizing precisely controlled infrared heat, the bonding mastic is gendy softened" until the tile can be easily removed and packaged by the operator.

1 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST.

1 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST.

Hoover's Online - Print Page 1 of 270 Join | Log In | Member Benefits | About Hoover's | Help | Site Map | everything you need to know aiiaut logistics Biid warehousing Choose Print from the File menu and then close this window.

Scott (deft's analyt chem expert) in DYER WATER PCB-SD0000024042 1 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the 2 signature to and reading of the deposition by the 3 witness is not waived, the deposition to have the same 4 force and effect as if full compliance had been had 5 with all laws and rules of Court relating to the 6 taking of depositions. 7 8 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that it 9 shall not be necessary for any objections to be made 10 by counsel to any questions, except as to form or 11 leading questions, and that counsel for the parties 12 may make objections and assign grounds at the time of 13 the trial, or at the time said deposition is offered 14 in evidence, or prior thereto. 15 16 17 3 Tucker, E.

CMiza CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION RECEIVED AUG 161993 TA PTNESKY August 11, 1993 Dear Vinyl Chloride Panel Research Coordinators: Copies of the Panel letter to the editor of the American Journal of Industrial Medicine and the response from Dr.

IN THE MATTER OF: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY vs.

IN THE MATTER OF: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY vs.

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that it shall not be necessary for any objections to be made by counsel to any questions except as to form or leading questions and that counsel may make objections and assign grounds at the time of trial or at the time said deposition is offered in evidence or prior thereto.