' FROM E .

DuPont objects to Plaintiff's definition of "Defendant"', "You"', "Your", and "Your company" to the extent that it includes "subsidiaries, foreign subsidiaries, foreign subsidiaries of predecessors, and/or affiliates" because the definition is overbroad and seeks information that would be irrelevant and not calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in this case.

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF ILLINOIS 2 ST.

DuPont objects to Plaintiffs definition of "Defendant", "You", "Your", and "Your company" to the extent that it includes "subsidiaries, foreign subsidiaries, foreign subsidiaries of predecessors, and/or affiliates" because the definition is overbroad and seeks information that would be irrelevant and not calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in this case.

INDUSTRIES PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.

FILE NAME Owens Illinois OWILL DATE 1980 Aug 19 DOC OWILL089 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Legal - Deposition of Everett C.

A Division of The Society of The Plastics Industry, Inc.

ntli.3 MARCH 25, 1988 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM FROM: MANAGER, HEALTH & SAFETY DEER PARK MANUFACTURING COMPLEX TO: ALL MANAGERS DEER PARK MANUFACTURING COMPLEX SUBJECT: HEALTH & SAFETY REVIEW REPORT-OUT Attached is the data presented by K.

Although there may be some Jadvantage to naming copolymers by the predominance of monomers, renaming the copolymers would only lead to . / confusion and unnecessary paperwork. . 86 supported the proposal; 57 expressed B.Administrative--Legal concern about the risk associated with the use ofvinyl chloride polymers; and 11 opposed the proposed ban on rigid and semirigid vinyl chloride polymers.

JThe 'Vinyl Institute A Division of The Society of The Plastics Industry, Inc.

DuPont objects to Plaintiffs definition of "Defendant", "You", "Your", and "Your company" to the extent that it includes "subsidiaries, foreign subsidiaries, foreign subsidiaries of predecessors, and/or affiliates" because the definition is overbroad and seeks information that would be irrelevant and not calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in this case.

Allowing an assessment of whether or not various inflammatory, degenerative, necrotic, hyperplastic or metaplastic changes occur in the nasal epithelium prior to (or at doses lower than those leading to) the development of tumors, 2.

REVIEWS Scand J Work Environ Health 14 (1988) 61--78 Effects of exposure to vinyl chloride An assessment of the evidence by Sir Richard Doll, FRS1 f R E C E T SfE If 'i 1088 QLORIA J.

wt a SLanadmMVyiceR.ecPZoobsDetrleoMnrD ME 5M Medical Department 8MP1l7aG5el3neNS:1N8B1u$iO5d1fi6nf8g1(020200.06:%08 661733 S152 Fax 3M June 27,200 : Sue Shallal, Ph.D.