TO from date REFERENCE SUBJECT MR R A PARK POTTSTOWN P J ELDRETH PERRYVILLE FEBRUARY 27, 1980 INTEROFFICE AMBIENT VINYL CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION - PERRYVILLE PLANT V Per our phone conversation of February 25, 1980 regarding the ambient vinyl chloride concentrations in air throughout the regu lated areas of the plant, the following is offered As I mentioned we do not maintain any records which would make this information readily available Our fixed monitoring system is not programmed to provide average exposures for each area or point monitored and our personnel monitoring program is set up to determine personnel (TWA) exposures only Therefore, without going into a great deal of detail or sum marizing several thousand print-out charts from the fixed monitoring system, I will try to address your question m rather general terms Although the V/C levels are approximations, I do believe they are realistic and fairly accurate as far as the normal and routine V/C concentrations are in Polymerization I and II In Polymerization I a normal vinyl chloride level or background level will range from l-5ppm in approximately 80% of the work areas This does not include the reactor, inside exposure, during the cleaning operation During a routine shift X would estimate that at least one monitoring point would be alarming at the 5~25ppm level, almost continuously The 25ppm and above alarm is seldom activated, but two or three alarms during an eight-hour shift w~ouI~d"nofTbe unusual As for the Polymerization II operation, the normal vinyl chloride background level is much lower I would suspect that l-2ppm would be normal with an occasional excursion above 5ppm when the operator opens a filter pot for cleaning or while he is obtaining a resin sample from the reactor On very rare occasions or during a system malfunction you may see the 25ppm and above alarm activated, but again, this would be rare and certainly not routine for the E-Resin operation I know this is rather vague and somewhat evasive, but as I men tioned earlier, it would require several days to summarize and analyze the numerous monitoring charts to gather the exact informa tion you are seeking I hope this will at least give you a pretty good idea as to what the area V/C levels are throughout the Perryville Plant You should keep in mind that these ambient V/C levels are for areas only and do not reflect what the employee (TWA) exposure would be for that particular work area PJE/sad cc Mr P J Foley 1 Mr L G Clouthier <f P J ELDRETH OCC 014664 TO FROM date REFERENCE SUBJECT MR R A PARK POTTSTOWN P J ELDRETH PERRYVILLE FEBRUARY 27, 1980 IFoiPcgetJoa (f) INTEROFFICE AMBIENT VINYL CHLORIDE CONCENTRATION - PERRYVILLE PLANT Per our phone conversation of February 25, 1980 regarding the ambient vinyl chloride concentrations in air throughout the regu lated areas of the plant, the following is offered As I mentioned we do not maintain any records which would make this information readily available Our fixed monitoring system is not programmed to provide average exposures for each area or point monitored and our personnel monitoring program is set up to determine personnel (TWA) exposures only Therefore, without going into a great deal of detail or sum marizing several thousand print-out charts from the fixed monitoring system, I will try to address your question m rather general terms Although the V/C levels are approximations, I do believe they are realistic and fairly accurate as far as the normal and routine V/C concentrations are in Polymerization I and II In Polymerization I a normal vinyl chloride level or background level will range from l-5ppm in approximately 80% of the work areas This does not include the reactor, inside exposure, during the cleaning operation During a routine shift I would estimate that - at ^Least one monltorJLnq point would be alarming at the 5-25ppm level, almost continuously The 25ppm and above alarm is seldom activated, but two or three alarms during an eight-hour shift would not be unusual As for the Polymerization II operation, the normal vinyl chloride background level is much lower I would suspect that l-2ppm would be normal with an occasional excursion above 5ppm when the operator opens a filter pot for cleaning or while he is obtaining a resin sample from the reactor On very rare occasions or during a system malfunction you may see the 25ppm and above alarm activated, but again, this would be rare and certainly not routine for the E-Resin operation I know this is rather vague and somewhat evasive, but as I men tioned earlier, it would require several days to summarize and analyze the numerous monitoring charts to gather the exact informa tion you are seeking I hope this will at least give you a pretty good idea as to what the area V/C levels are throughout the Perryville Plant You should keep in mind that these ambient V/C levels are for areas only and do not reflect what the employee (TWA) exposure would be for that particular work area PJE/sad cc Mr P J Foley SMT1A Mr L G Clouthier P J ELDRETH OCC 014665

ffllSSffty MINUTES OF MEETING CMA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE L:00 p.m., Monday, January L0, 19S3 Ocean Reef, Key Largo, Florida I.

3^^* DOW CHEMICAL U.S.A.

SALES CONTRACT NO. 83-8-11 t CELANESE a CHEMICAL ICOMMNV'.INC Dated January 10 , 19 83 CELANESE CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. of 1250 W.

THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO Akron Branch Office Akron Government Center \ 161 South High Street, 3rd Floor Akron, Ohio 44308 May 31, 1989 Diversitech General A GenCorp Company One General Street Akron, OH 44329 SUBJECT: Claim #0D21223-22; Claimant -- William Price In accordance with the Joint Resolution adopted by the Industrial Commission of Ohio and the Bureau of Workers' Compensation, all fee bills for examinations requested by the Industrial Commission are to be sent to and paid immediately by the self-insured employer.

GenCorp POLYMER PRODUCTS March 9, 1989 Cleval Evaluation Center Suite 102 Medical Arts Building 18660 Bagley Road Middleburg Heights, Ohio 44130 Attention: B.

--'^:^f .- '*- ,. -. ,* ,;*. j.,^* 'U : ". .

ALAN E.

i i^etu York State Journal of Medicine(ISSN 002S-762BJ -Y T.

vS'*' ta ./> v .> cv November 7, 1983 Hr.

- Jfi *1 JUN 2 1980 RECEIVER % Industrial Safety Equipment Association May 29, 1980 PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT SAG-52 BULLETIN NO. 80-SW-5 TO THE SAFETY NEAPING APPAPEL GROUP: ASBESTOS SUBSTITUTES WORKSHOP Believing you will find it of interest, we have enclosed an announce ment from the Asbestos Information Association's newsletter, and also an announcement on the same subject from the Federal Register of May 27, 1980, regarding a workshop related to finding substitutes for as bestos in various products.

S S' ..oV PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT AB-147 l&HN C.

ASARCD 'Paso Plant September 10, 1984 ASSISTANT GENERAL SUPERINTENDENTS AND ALL DEPARTMENT HEADS ASBESTOS GLOVES foMtrei I have instructed the warehouse not to purchase asbestos gloves.

/*',* * r" vt,. r.'-*.*.

Specifications for Asbestos Removal - Case 46102-1 Pol Laboratories if August 24, 1981 iw h.