h a d e n ame: COOLEDGE HYGRADE c at ec o r y : Exterior House raint c o l o *: NUMBER: White 100 QUALITY: First PICMENT: 66$ Basic Carbonate 168 50/50 Leaded Zinc Ox. 280 Titanium Pigment Mang.112 YIELD IN CALLONS_____________ UNIT COST 3.00 V !.

Interior Gloss Paints V'hite 2301 Second PIGMENT: 52% Tic Rcht - Titanox C Lithopone Surfex ' VEHICLE: 43* Varnish Falk 0 Var "K" Heavy Newport "Zinol" Varnish Heavy "aphtha Cut Cobalt Drier Nuodex Lead 24^ Varnish Shkg., Rec. & Handling Calculated Yield Manufacturing Loss 2* Actual Yield LB. 200 100 100 117 32 64 117.50 32.50 7.00 4.78 .92 775.70 GALLONS 7.33 2.79 4.45 16.00 4.00 8.00 16.00 5.00 1.00 .50 .12 65.24 1.30 63.94 UNIT COST . 5.50 P H LBS 4.26 1.67 TOTAL COS' 11.00 4.26 1.67 75.00 P H GAL 55.12 63.50 93.00 8.07 79.13 135.50 125.00 12.00 2.20 5.08 14.38 40 .7?

Tide Water clea.ned TK No. 5, 3,500,000 gallon capacity, containing leaded gasoline on Sunday, August 11th, at Rensselaer, New York without notifying us.

Cii Eosene #5 Coba.lt Drier Sy5 lo Lead Fine Oil Calculated Yield Manufacturing Lots Actual Yield Lb.

Oscar Blan d, who was form erly employed by the Eagle P ich er Lead Co., ad vise s th at he i s now r eceivin g a se r ie s o f treatm en ts from you.

Georg Callh gaert Ethyl Gasoline Corporation 723 East Milwaukee Avenue D et r oit , Michigan Dear Cal* I have seen on of the simpler types of mercury d etector s as supplied by the General Ele ct r ic Company, and I as very much In terested in knowing th at they have developed or are developing a more precis equipment for t h is purpose* Hot 'only am I in t er est ed in t h is device in connection with mercury exposure* but I am also d e fin it e ly in t er sr t ed in th app licat ion of some such p r in cip le for the detection of t et r aet h y l lead * You are w ell aware, no doubt* t h at the instrument would bo of very l i t t l e use to us u n less i t would give fa i r l y accu rate qu an t itative figu r e s.

rn i sh ' r rni sii Recovered Oil Blown Soya Oil O-ioss Oil Cobalt Drier (Tollate) lead Drier (Tollate) Calculated Yield _ Manufacturing Loss 2;J Actual Yield 206 103 1404 32 716 8 12 5171 27.5 13.7 180.0 10.0 ' 90.0 1.0 1.2 429.8 8.8 421.0 . oL y^.075 ' a i/f ,s''*.10S . iyjef i083 .oxi cr . 15X i.0 tf*0l.O29 * , g 02- *305 , a 6 n- f .093 15,.45 10,.82 113,.55 3..20 20O ,,,7464 1,,12 S273 .16 CCSC ANALYSIS: Material cost per -alien or pound (Total Direct Labor cost per gallon Factory Overhead per gallon Puli: cost per gallon Conniete Package cost per rallon 'Factory cost in package per gallon cost divided by actual yield) $ .65 Plot known Not known N o t known Not known Not known PRICES: (A) Company owned or controlled outlet $1.15 gal (3) Independent wholesaler 1.15 gal (C) Comnany owned or controlled outlet to retail customer See (A) (3) Independent Retailer 1.15 gal (IP) To other (Painters, Industrial, etc.) 1.27 gal Above prices are highest charred -- average prices will closely aor.roxinsate (A) N 4981 OPA 15435

Line Falk Z 3 Castor Oil Oleum lijfj Lead 6^ Cobalt op Ma:iganese Calculated Yield Ma-iiufactaring Loss Actual Yield 100.0 3.0 137.0 364.0 2,5 2.4 1.2 10.38 25.00 55.00 .31 .31 . 16 92.66 2.56 90.00 16fc .01 1.46 ooi .S4| Go ___1,55______ . 16.50 .03 36.50 4.76 SG .82 ___ 125 53.12 COST ANALYSIS Material cost per gallon (total cost divided by actual yield)--------------Direct labor cost per gallon-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Factory overhead per gallon---------------------------------------------------------------------------------3ulk cost per gallon---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------Complete package cost per gallon (container plus filling expense)------- Factory cost in package per gallon---------------------------------------------- ---------------------- .655 .0137 .0640 .759 .16 .359 P5ICS3 Show the highest net unit price which was charged or which would have been charged in March 1942 to each of the following types of buyers or transferees: (A) To a con-cany owned or controlled outlet----------------------------------(B) To an independent wholesaler-- --------------------------------------------------(C) By company owned or controlled outlet to retail customer-- (D) To an independent retailer (dealer)--------------------------------------------- 1.15 (E) To other (specify)------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Our business is principally through the independent retail dealer and therefore we are showing that price only) OPA 15863 N 5062

I am afraid it i3 not very easy to determine the probable lead content of hay or grain exposed in thi3 manner to exhaust fumes, for I suspect the particulate matter and the gaseous combustion products may tend to accumulate in the proximal layers of the exposed material rather than to be distributed throughout.

it iHgftwnt- WntiAM ASStAKCH Kmb-To m TRIMS . m op Kem-Teae fiOUES-KOATER . 9% Mu Rem-Tese V f Acme White lead & Color Woiks.

Maxell1 I am very glad to inform you that the lead symposium has been accepted after a long delay due to the absence of the editor from his office, and will appear in the February number of the Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology.

YIELD IN GALLONS UNIT COST TOTAL COST Titanox A L 0 Zopaque Green Seal Zinc 707A Zinc Kadox Zinc 2466 Glyptal Dipentine 24$ Lead 6$ Cobalt Thin With 2466 Glyptal Texaco CALCULATED YIELD MANUFACTURING LOSS 2 ACTUAL YIELD 350 50 20 35 15 318 50 10^ 1 300 152 1301^ 10.780 1.540 .4242 .7424 .3182 41.8488 6.550 1.0815 .1250 39.480 23.4080 126.2981 3.1575 123.1406 .15 .15 .10 .077 .077 .195 .085 .15 .315 .195 .02 52.50 7.50 2.00 2.70 1.16 62.01 4.25 1.58 .32 58.50 3,04 $195.56 COST ANALYSIS: MATERIAL COST PER GALLON CR POUND (TOTAL COST DIVIDED BY ACTUAL YIELD)................

H ieing D ivision PLAINTIFF'S | EXHIBIT ( ; * ' \ =>* i 2 /oJvB PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT HHH PArsobdeusctoeds Pinertshoenaml aitntejurryofCases, Abrams Lead & copied to

You are probably aware of the fact that the upper limit for the lead content of drinking water is generally set at 0.10 mgs. per liter.

During the first part of the trial week before last, Judge Holcombe indicated that he' remembered vividly what he had learned about lead intoxi cation from you and for that reason, plus the fact that plaintiff's only medical vfitness, Dr.