June 18, 19$* Dr* Bradford C* Scuddor Modleal Director The Grasselli Chemical Company Cleveland, Ohio Dear ""Dr* 'geudders ' ' ' ' ' .......... . " X am sanding you herewlfeh three copies of the analyses which have been capifeed up fee the prosanti time, and you rill note that only a few remain to be dono so fcliafe Ife is possible afe presenti bo givo a brief analysts of the situation* .... h&t ibo call your attention to the fact that vq have nob yets received the pads from the respirators, and that the results on then will be of considerable importance since they will show the exposure frost a some what different angle* We should have the results on these before our data aro complete and entirely satisfactory* By way of preliminary orientation, lefc a ' point; out that the normal figures for lead Ij&v a mean figure of about; (*2) mgs* per sample of faeces, but that th normal figure sometimes goes as high as (*9) ssg* X think m are safe in arbitrarily setting th level of normality her at such a figure that any amount above {*5 ) mgs* ay be regarded as a significant and definite lead exposure* The urines of normal individuals rarely run in excess of {*06} Any figure of (*10) or over is, therefore, definitely above th normal range* As to arsenic, the con centrations in normal individuals, in our experience, rarely exceed (*0&)mgs* so that If w set (*1) as th proper level of normal, wo shall have a fairly satisfactory criterion* It Is Quite apparent from the results that there la a significant exposure to lead in the Insecticide plant and in the 2ino Oxide plant* Judging from the observations which 1 made in both'of these plants, the use of respiretore has materially reduced the hasards* I am somewhat surprised to find that respirators are as effective as the figures indicate* Despite the respirators, however* ife Is apparent from the fa cal figures that a fair proportion of the men are exponod to considerable amounts of lead* It is also apparent from the distribution of high findings in'the urine that a number of th men have been aboorbing lead in signifies amounts .'
refid# OjqZoJ0ONvE3wJQ9LR44KNLp2 pages
J.
refid# B0Xz95E1n1wpnpy8YqBNKxL41 page
0016244
refid# 0JKw9RmqOxp8d9JaOZj9e06Em1 page
F e b r u a r y 20, I9I4.6 Hr. 0.
refid# QJvKJKdjV4bKp4joXRYERnx7k1 page
JEW ELL W.
refid# 6XGKpb3pmxkgybwEroZEjY61 page
Kay 25, 19^3 Ur.
refid# mqDErO6NOzGBxO3DjYZ9b0D3Q3 pages
REPORT OF A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF THE BRASS FOUNDRY OF THE SCHAIBLE COMPANY CINCINNATI, OHIO From the Kettering Laboratory In the Department of Preventive Medicine and Industrial Health, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio H 0018570 Material* Source : Method of Collection!
refid# bo9XyReeeNLgjQw47vyKJ2367 pages
iB 0316364' FROM s u bjec t Mr.
refid# kaEYq1VOVx10J86waEbo2MjZq2 pages
M essrs.
refid# vVQz9JqrEx57Y0kgEBe68kedb1 page
May 21, 196& Miss Villa McKay Editorial Assistant Review of Allergy 75 Bay State Road Boston, Massachusetts 02215 Dear Miss McKayj Thanks for your letter of May 14.
refid# omp4GZoYGVz9DOwdkNm4XOgK31 page
* . ' ' f Office of Th e Ch em ical Exam in er So Govern m en t MEDICAL COLLEGE Calcutta, - _thenJBliLikx*-/9 3'Q Dear Dr.
refid# 44594BRRKX6bOE5q5xYe76jBp1 page
!
refid# bBrRV0X9ymjrk21EpOVZL0yak1 page
.A TO FROM SU BJECT ETHYL CORPORATION INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Dr.
refid# oDmwqYg70bjzd4znoDgqmLoew1 page
( CORRESPONDENCE) r ID o o k N21139 Baltimore City Hospitals 4940 Eastern Avenue Baltimore, Maryland. 21224 pear Doctor Chisolm: There are certain statements in the article which you sent me with which I am not in agreement, certain others of which I am in doubt, and certain others about which I wish to raise questions.
refid# wwLwgVZm7zE9rNJVMwjM8eXQ5 pages
HARVARD M EDICAL SCH O O L DEPARTMENT OF PEDIATRICS Ghildren't fffospitel JOOJjngxeotdAvenue `Boston,........r .m e...22:jL. 193 Dr.
refid# 5YzgdK6e4GZaZQ0OwE5eYK101 page