September 22, 2023 Non--confidential comments for Annex XV restriction report: Persistence, ecotoxicity, and emissions of PFAS to the environment Dear Madam or Sir, We welcome the opportunity to provide input on the restriction proposal regarding per-- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
refid# 96xExr0o7M3ar9v89e270YM66 pages
Comments on ECHA's proposed restriction for PFAS September 7, 2023 The Japan Bearing Industry Association We, the Japan Bearing Industrial Association (JBIA), composed of member companies engaged in the manufacture of bearings, have made efforts to promote the features of bearings as environmentally friendly products.
refid# kDj4OZO1DpRwdb70y0Dweoany3 pages
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering Table 1.
refid# 4JpnqkMEn0YgjrXrg4papDwmR1 page
EU PFAS restriction > 2020: NL, DE, DK, SE and NO announce preparation of restriction dossier > Group approach; OECD 2021 definition > Common concern persistency, additional concerns > All uses, except fire fighting foams > Restriction according to REACH article 69.5 EU PFAS restriction 15 June 2022 7 Image: EEA, Eionet Report - ETC/WMGE 2021/9, December 2021 Group approach EU PFAS restriction 9 15 June 2022 Uses Image source: https://defence.gov.au/environment/pfas/PFAS.asp EU PFAS restriction 15 June 2022 > EC/ECHA: fire fighting foams (not included) > Germany: consumer mixtures, metal plating, transport > Denmark: lubricants, construction products, electronics and energy > Sweden: textile, cosmetics > Norway: ski wax, petroleum and mining, Fgas uses > Netherlands: food contact materials, medical applications, production of fluoropolymers and waste and recycling > Additional uses will be added to the dossier 12 Consultation rounds Manufacure and import TULAC Food contact materials and packaging Metal plating and manufacturing of...
refid# 71MzadzJ0xz1XXxO09mOJrJXR18 pages
refid# 6B6obm6DQkOKgmmdkm9MB1xvE2 pages
Remarks 4/26/2024 Universal PFAS restriction Overall Timeline and Important Milestones ECHA FFF restriction Scope Scope defined for RoI (exclusion WP2 and possible E-use WP7) Scope defined for Annex XV report (ongoing assessments can still lead to changes in scope i.e. substances/substance groups to be excluded, uses to be derogated etc.) 2nd round CfE Call for Evidence for specific information (15.
refid# 3Nkn6KvgjvoGbOxrywBNEN3z311 pages
refid# 0gppqxBG39O774mwZmKr93XyM6 pages
Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1 - 25 D - 44149 Dortmund, Germany phone: fax: e-mail: 2
refid# qkeg58Qp3OwMmEnvvpKKMMY0k2 pages
Draft agenda for PFAS-RESTRICTION WEBEX Meeting between DE, DK, NL, NO, SE CA, ECHA and COM 30 August, 9:00 - 13:00 (CET) Login details: See below Point 1 - Opening and adoption of the agenda (9:00 - 9:10 am) Point 2 - Status of COM/ECHA restriction on firefighting foams (9:10 - 09:50 am) - Collaboration UPFAS-FFF Break 09:50 - 10:10 am Point 3 - Minutes and action points (10:10 - 10:20 am) 2021-07-26_PFAS RESTR-18 Minutes and APs_Draft of FINAL.docx 2021-08-23_List of open APs.docx Point 4 - Overall strategy (10:20 - 11:00 am) - Dealing with industry requests for meetings - Checking the timetable: Are we on track?
refid# pm9oj9Z9j6z45R0g0qrqXO1gw2 pages
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN " 'L 9` F i l if 1 Mme-I: ~v U Mgy'i T" 7: 5 DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT State of Minnesota, by its Aflofl`gfiuw ' Lori Swanson, its Commissioner of Pollution Control, Paul Aasen, and its Commissioner of Natural Resources, Tom Landwehr, Case Type: Other Civil Civil File No. 27-CV-10-28862 Judge Margaret A.
refid# Ne600peKrVzaNRrkN227NQpkR14 pages
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Lori Swanson, its Commissioner of Pollution Control, Paul Aasen, and its Commissioner of Natural Resources, Tom Landwehr, Plaintiff, vs. 3M Company, Defendant
refid# dQD9MJRYRdrLokwyQvODNXQGB35 pages
SSTTAATTEE OOFF CCAALLIIFFOORRNNIIAA EARL WARREN Governor | FFIIEELLDD IINNVVEESSTTIIGGAATTIIOONN | OOFF WWAASSTTEE WWAATTEERR RREECCLLAAMMAATTIIOONN IINN RREELLAATTIIOONN TTOO | GGRROOUUNNDD WWAATTEERR PPOOLLLLUUTTIIOONN Ei (rene 11995533 SSTTAATTEE WWAATTEERR PPOOLLLLUUTTIIOONN CCOONNTTRROOLL BBOOAARRDD SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA SWPCB Publication, No. 6 11001122..00000011 Exhibit 11001122 State of Minnesota v. 3M Co., Court File No. 27-CV-10-28862 10101122..00000022 - : TD i 2 C3 FOREWORD na, FOREWORD in TIgnnroaawnnthaarraeeanadssuudccehhveaalssopCCmaaellniiftfoo,rrntnihiaea,,pwwoshhseierbrieeliwwtaiaettseerrofbbeewccaoosmmteeesswaaatlleiirmmiritteiicnnlggamffaaatccittooonrr tatianakkkgeenroooowwnnletsshdppgeeacecniidaoalfldtsseiihvggenenilkioffiiipcncmadanneoccnefet..
refid# jBz6M75NxYnxjDnmM1rNyLg6k125 pages
WE . .
refid# 8VyBXnj3DmJwzVGvQLBDy0JOK51 pages
TTSSCCAA SSeeccttiioonn 88((ee)) CCoommmmitittteeee MMeeeteitinngg.
refid# w5J57G43ogq0DO8QrzdwYakB3 pages
`hc11ioo99cmm77p~h5pooucunnUUdsdisossininnggmbaolponpordtede~b0cobonaanscbknc~okumetsbptorr|4oaaa5otidpidoocfmnfbromonnmPmtmFstaOhrhdrSooo)du.1nanWdmdtotlhirNmN:MkMcRwooI,ma~usGxGterryeysy( (taavruede~ pdroTgTrateaevrdcoeso~asmntrxce~~pctmpoorotrnrarttfatpfepiirrctoemetsnsnemaocnbectoe~t(uooAtf0fC0e..oS00rr)53gaapapn~onpi~mmdDOflOuuFoF,nr.iene HwobhrsiecnhqacuPoeants~ypapo:unldPssteodraibonuBtsoi4as~dhpeCpvmbhiaFscFeciOeSn)o.znaWviooaAcCfwaaar1sbe9toinm7:.F~ GiayntndBaTutaalv,so"b nOfr~paci~c(Ap iChsSotTr)oFacOnods AmpAoiuadtshie OOFFceoommppoouunnd~.
refid# 7G1dzn2my8a747NO1Kq1zJDB1 page