Lead Paints are banned in Europe because of the danger of Lead Poisoning.

Thus, beyond question this material is essentially commercial tetraethyl lead.

They show that in certain circumstances the lead compound which ethyl contains may be distinctly detri mental to th health of man. , :.

May contain lead compound.

.^` LEAD INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION 4X0 LCXtHOTON AVENUE NEW YORK 17, N.

He would like to make further medical studies of the 11 people in the 3 City Survey that had the higher blood and urine lead contents.

NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY' New York, 111 Broadway; Buffalo, 116 Oak St.; Chicago, 900 Wpst 18th Sc; Cincinnati, 659 Free man Ave.; Cleveland, 820 West Superior Ave.; SC Louis, 722 Chestnut St.; San Francisco, 22+0-24'th Street; Boston, National-Boston Lead Co., 800 Albany S4 Pittsburgh, National Lead & Oil Co. of Penna., 326 Fourth Avenue; Philadel phia, John T.

ilK WHITE LEAD (PASTE).

Ho first deed about the Hor-rosiaate amount of lead, ' y.!

Leads shall be stranded copper motor lead wire with 600 volt weatherproof Insulation, permanently identified, with crimp-on type copper terminals.

N- P- V. & L.

Defendant further objects to this request because it fails to describe with reasonable particularity the item or category of items sought to be inspected as required by Rule 196.1 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and because it seeks matters that are not relevant to the subject matter of this lawsuit or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Defendant objects to this Interrogatory insofar as it is overly broad, unduly burdensome, irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Defendant further objects to this request because it fails to describe with MW/103384 -6- reasonable particularity the item or category of items sought to be inspected as required by Rule 196.1 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and because it seeks matters that are not relevant to the subject matter of this lawsuit or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Maremont objects to plaintiffs discovery requests on the grounds that they are overbroad, vague, unduly burdensome, not relevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.