This was an EPA lead inspection. 8) Previous Inspection History On February 26, 2015, NCDEQ conducted the most recent RCRA CEI at the subject facility and found apparent violations of RCRA's requirements for hazardous waste container management.

PAINS ANG VAINISIIEE cine ismansermmusms smrssssten sists eh ems sores pasa as sess sh 25 2965163 Executive Summary The Alliance for Telomer Chemistry Stewardship (ATCS) represents the world's leading producers of C6 short-chain fluorotelomer-based chemistry.

Impact of fluorinated refrigerants and their degradation products on the environment and health February, 2021 Report and statement of the downsides of HFO refrigerant usage -Impact of fluorochemical refrigerants and their degradation products on the environment and health- Published on: 22.02.2021 Refolution Industrieklte GmbH, Karpatenstrae 26 ,76227 Karlsruhe Geschftsfhrer: Thomas Frank, Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 733782 USt-ID: DE324935121 Impact of fluorinated refrigerants and their degradation products on the environment and health February, 2021 Abstract Refrigerants with a high Global Warming Potential (GWP) are phased out step by step by regulations such as the international Kigali amendment of the Montreal Protocol or the EU F-Gas-regulation.

Reese Award for Excellence in Teaching from the graduating class of Columbia Law School EFLCITRLONIEADY 3 Until November 2022 I served as the Immediate Past Chair of the Board of the Society of Empirical Legal Studies SELS the leading academic association in the world of empirical - 2023Oct legal scholars I was Chair of the Board of SELS from 2017 to 2019.

In the Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization Act of 2024, Congress directed the Agency to transition the piston-engine general aviation aircraft fleet to unleaded aviation gasoline, which is approved for all piston-engine aircraft types and piston-engine models, by 2030 through the Eliminate Aviation Gasoline Lead Emissions Initiative (EAGLE) program.

Please provide details if so including with reference to tonnages, concentration levels, ability to segregate waste, and impacts where possible.: As we highlighted in question 10 - There is a great deal of uncertainty and a lack of data associated with the extent to which the lower thresholds of the lead option will impact on the wide range of waste streams potentially containing PFOS.

This was an EPA lead inspection. 8) Previous Inspection History On February 26, 2015, NCDEQ conducted the most recent RCRA CEI at the subject facility and found apparent violations of RCRA's requirements for hazardous waste container management.

From: Sent: To: Subject: Disrud, Doug Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:02:35 +0000 Meachum, Pete (OST) Congrats and intro: THUD appropriations [You don't often get email from doug.disrud@mail.house.gov.

Newhouse leads the charge and discussion on why we must open up our public lands for public access.

The briefing shall include-- (1) a description of the technologies included in the survey; (2) a list of the technologies that were considered for further testing or analysis; and (3) any technologies that are undergoing additional analysis for possible application within the Department." 2 Overview FY 2020 NDAA Sec 322 Summary of Non-Foam Alternatives Considered Detailed Descriptions and Assessments 3 Option Ignitable liquid drainage floor (SafespillTM) High expansion foam (Hi-Ex) Trench Nozzles Water-only sprinklers Optical Flame Detection only Water mist Non-Foam Alternatives to AFFF Cost Pros Cons $$$$ Most effective fire containment & suppression Expensive No chemicals involved so avoids Longer to install environmental and health concerns Single supplier that must scale up to meet DoD demand Fire code compliant New product with unproven long-term performance $$$$ PFAS Free Well-understood and trusted Fire code compliant Very expensive Some structures unable to bear heavy foam generators Longer extinguishment time leads to more damage $$$$ Very effective containment and suppression Expensive retrofit option Fire code compliant $ Inexpensive Not effective against fuel fires Water-only avoids environmental concerns Does not meet DoD fire code for hangars with fueled aircraft $ Inexpensive No chemicals involved so avoids environmental concerns Little to no maintenance Will not suppress a fire Detectors alone are not compliant with DoD fire code $$$ Excellent heat removal Still under development Water-only avoids environmental concerns Moderate cost to retrofit existing sprinkler systems Not yet compliant with DoD fire code for hangars with fueled aircraft 5 Ignitable Liquid Drainage Floor Description Ignitable liquid drainage is a perforated aluminum floor placed on a hangar floor.

Inspection ID Class I and II Well Inspection Form US Environmental Protection Agency - Region 4 Underground Injection Control Program 61 Forsyth Street SW, MC 9T25, Atlanta, Georgia, 30303 Phone: (404)562-9424 Inspector(s): Anthony Shelton Carol Chen _ (lead), , EPA Well ID#: Year-Month-Day: 2 0 2 1 - 1 1 - 1 8 EPA Permit # (or RA): Carl Weller Page 1 Of 2 Start Time: 12:50 pm End Time: 12:59 pm Facility Contact Information Facility Name: PETRO HARVESTER OPERATING COMPANY, LLC Street Address: 1107 W 6th St (office address) City: Laurel County: Jones Nature of Business: Oil and gas extraction industry Facility Owner/Operator: PETRO HARVESTER OPERATING COMPANY, LLC Email: kerry.allen@rockallenergy.com Facility Contact (if different): Kerry Allen, Sr.

NPDES Tribal Wastewater Lagoon National Database Information Inspection Date: November 16, 2023 Inspection Type: CEI-Unpermitted Lagoon Entry/Exit Time: 13:00 - 14:30 NPDES ID Number: MTU000299 SIC Code: 22132-Sewage Treatment Facility Inspection ID: 202311_MTU000299 Lead inspector and affiliation: Lisa-kay Prideaux, U.S.

Inspection Photos Photo Log PageImage Descriptions 25Slope along northern perimeter 24Slope along northern perimeter against wetlands 23Unstabilized land 22Slope along mapped wetlands 21More stream inside wetlands 20Stream inside mapped wetlands 19Swale into retention basin 2 18Culvert into retention basin 2 17Slope on southern perimeter with swale 16Flat land along northern perimeter 15Small culvert and retention basin 1 14Retention Basin 1 13Retention Basin 1 next to wetlands 12Wetlands with berm 11Slope on northern perimeter 10Space for outdoor pickleball courts Pooling on side of swale Hydroseeding of southern perimeter Catch Basin leading to retention pond 1 Water traveling along perimeter 98765432 Water pooling at southern perimeter Slope near entrance to site Culvert near entrance to site Flat / Unstabilized land at northern perimeter 1Northern perimeter 4 ED_019088A_00006055-00004

EPA Marc Hoss Koch Methanol Haleigh Engler Koch Methanol Josh Wiggins Koch Methanol Whitney Mantooth Koch Methanol Kevan Reardon Koch Methanol Inspector/Enforcement Officer Inspector VP of Manufacturing & Plant Manager Environmental Engineer Technical Manager Health and Safety Manager Environmental Health Safety & Security EPA Lead Inspector Signature/Date ANTHONY ROBLEDO Digitally signed by ANTHONY ROBLEDO DN: c=US, o=U.S.

NPDES Inspection Report - Hydrostatic Testing National Database Information Inspection Date: July 23, 2024 Inspection Type: Hydrostatic Testing Entry/Exit Time: 1100 / 1300 NPDES ID Number: MT0030791 NAICS Code: 562910 Remediation Inspection ID: 202407_MT0030791 Services Lead inspector and affiliation: Lisa-kay Prideaux, U.S.