WAIVER OF NOTICE AND CONSENT TO ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDER __ OF A.

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT JANUARY 1980 FROM THE U.S.

24tN.M0riat.cot.a4S>* August 28, 1985 Ms.

To: R.

Line 13 - Disposal Code - Enter the code that best describes the manner in which the waste on Line 12 was disposed.

Sunshine Act Meetings Fedoral Register Vo!.

22690 Federal Register / Vol. 51, No, 119 / Friday, June 20, 1986 / Rules and Regulations the ALA'S CV estimate for intersample method reflects a truer estimate of the asbestos fibers on a filter, the practical . variability necessarily reflectsa random random variability of the method limit of detection for the NIOSH 7400 error that is intrinsic to the P&CAM 239 because, of the greater degree of method is much higher: or NIOSH 7400 methods, finding instead that nonrandom error, caused by inadequate sampling times, low fiber counts, etc. accounts for what the A1A consistency in laboratory practices and training between the different johnsManville laboratories that generated the sampling data.

Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 119 / Friday, June 20, 1986 / Rules and Regulations 22721 participants were of the opinion that this 6/25, p. 57).

Federal Register / Vol. 51.

to delete the asbestos, and the date the product was first produced without the asbestos; (i) If the product is no longer produced, all reasons it was discontinued, the identity of the person(s) who made the decision to discontinue the product, the brand name of the replacement product, and the date the replacement product first went into production; and (j) The reasons why asbestos was used as an ingredient in each such product.

ASBESTOS INFORMATION ASSOCIATION 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal Square 4, Suite 509 Arlington, Virginia 22202 (703) 979-1150 April 25, 1986 I ll STFWART MAY 021986 Memorandum For: Norman Abbott, Certified Brakes Shlomo Mevorach, Distex E.

Hay 10, 1988 HWBUI0001333 HVHA Statement on the Proposed Occupational Health Pules for Asbestos Good Morning!

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation T* ^ JAN n C.

INTERROGATORY NO. 68: Prior to the date on which Defendant first directed that a warning accompany any product identified in response to Interrogatory Nos. 19 and 42, did any person, firm, organization or other entity, within or without your employ, suggest, recommend, counsel, advise, or otherwise indicate in any manner, that a warning should accompany any or all of such products or asbestos-containing products generally?

DATE: August 25, 1988 TO: Rob Douglas & Dab Mathews FROM: D.