fiat Albany Csspus 311 Taxation It flaaaoc Bids* #9 Specification Ko. 13492 H July 12, 1961 21000 I..

PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT AL- 13 ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA POINT COMFORT, TEXAS SMELTING OPERATIONS SAFETY RULES AND REGULATIONS Revised:.

AirhatBrand Helmet With built-in powered air purifier Powered air protection for head, (ace and lungs.

I BONDED BRAKE SHOE SETS WITH FRICTIONEERED FOR POWER OR STANDARD BRAKES FERGUSON TRACTOR Year 1960-58?

| PLAINTIFF'S (I EXHIBIT I July 10, 1964 AB-44 Mr* Charles Mallory, Works Haaafsr Anarlcan Brakebiok Division American Brake Shot Company Winchester, Virginia KEt ACCIDB&T F8EYSKTI08 PROGRESS REPORT 8-L-6T to S-l-64 Dear Hr.

AmMcaft&iflkcMok.

'\ ;. railroad products group Ss :\ ;; .: )j asw1 A ;-a.n cac o: :rs Rack cars are-d'pirg ;s |r;ac$ a-.t a irge's-are o'he big-vCitre business .n t-anspcrta!

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE COMPANY The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

PROCEDURE FOR CHECK-OUT OF AIR BRAKE SYSTEMS PUBLISHED AS A SERVICE TO FLEET OPERATORS BY Copyright 1964 SPNY 005961 J!

Castings and Fnrgings FOR ALL INDUSTRY 38% OF SALES Shipments of castings and forgings amounted to S92.300.000. up 13 per cent over the preced ing year.

1 `04/88/97 10:00:58 (Jest Publishing Co -> % 420 F 2d 928 (Cite as: 420 F.2d 928. *933) 215 735 3888 Page 888 Page 6 933 Thus, based on 1962 figures, Abex (the third largest manufacturer) merged with Wellman (the largest) so as to acquire 609fc Of the sintered metal friction market [FNU stock, or other share capital, or assets, held or nd itself of the directors chosen contrary to the provisions 0f sections (7 and 8) of this (Act) * .' 15 USC 21(b)(1964) FN1 The FTC chart also indicates that Abex and Wellman together controlled slightly greater percentages of the submarket in 1960 and 1961 In United States v Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 US 321, 83 SCt 1715, 10 LEd 2d 915 (1963), the Supreme Court said 'Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an undue percentage share of the relevant market, and results in a significant increase in the concentration of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must be enjoined in the absence of evidence clearly showing that the merger is not likely to have such anticompetitive effects See United States v Koppers Co, 202 F Supp 437 (D C W D Pa 1962)' United States v Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, supra at 363, 83 S Ct at 1741

, ONTARIO pftevtftet Of owouftmivY INDUCTRiAl SAFETY BRANCH DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR A4 VICTORIA STREET TORONTO IA ONTARIO 36S-4I2S \0 - c?

June 22, 1961 Bureau of Workmen's Compensation Ohio Departments Building Colunbus IS, Ohio Attention: Mr.

OUR.

4* BUILDING SERVICE INDUSTRIAL SALES CO , INC.