Refine
Estimated Years 1940-1949Clear
5,670 results foundRefine Search
International Smelting and Refining Comraw 25 Broadway.
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# RkrygMG2Y194ZO7X4o2bBaV85 pages
Rugby Triumph Over Bears For Kentucky Forces Face ing rato.'
Document image
refid# X3bRypj9XaRGxz37NDxDQLoB1 page
f Ift-S^yMATEO TIMES SATURDAY.
Document image
refid# Qg57nNo8aaxVqjngYKw9VN59o1 page
Transfer llhfrord CTrPte/f'hs Put W'pcleyr Are ffVd&eb have had a salutary iaasassass&t ...... ...|" Why do smart shoppers L_J spend ft:-#) only$3.99 for whiskey' W SUNMY BH0OK MO DOWN PAVMENT' As Little as 20,90 per week NATURAL RANK 1399.00 if!
Document image
refid# 70RNJZnnmG8vQ2BnxwJGdVmNR1 page
TRADE HiKEt CATEGORfi COLOR: : NUMBER: .
Document image
refid# 6BRr04b20B44vbO78ky4dBJ9o1 page
CATEGORY: I %PIGMENT: 65.8 Titanox B-30 White Lead Carbonate Asbestine ------------ - yUALITY:" LBS.
Document image
refid# NgBk22p7Mv0q9yoEOrqb9eQ81 page
t he uiHRREn company i SECTION I Cost & Selling Prices as of March 31, 1942 TRADE NAME: CATEGORY: COLOR: NUMBER: QUALITY: Warren's Gray Steel Sash Putty Steel Sash Glazing Gray None First PIGMENT: 89.70# Whiting - 55 Mesh Whiting - 200 Mesh White Lead Coloring Material VEHICLE: 10.30# Linseed Fatty Acid Raw Linseed Oil Mineral Spirits Dryer Calculated *ield Manufacturing Loss 2# Actual Yield Lbs. 220 187 36 1 1 33.25 15.75 1 495.00 9.90 485.10 Unit Cost Total Ci .0041 Per lb .0046 Per Lb. .0850 Per Lb. .3650 Per Lb. . .90 . 36 3.C6 .36 .15 Per Lb. 1.11 Per Gal. .12 .15 4.99 .27 .08 10.67 COST ANALYSIS Material Cost Per Pound Direct Labor Cost Per Pound Factory Overhead Cost Per Pound Bulk Cost Per Pound Complete Package Cost Per Pouna Factory Cost in Package per Pound $ .r-3 .006 .POL . 04 . 008 . 048 (B) Independent Wholesaler ID) Independent Dealer (E) Retail PRICES $4.50 Cwt. 5.00 Cwt. 6.00 Cwt.
Document image
refid# 4JMLB3kqzvmdj9pYk8EyG7M8R1 page
January 12* 1943* fr* Xarl iambaoh* dept* bio logical Chcraistry* College of 1'ledicine*. diversity of Cincinnati* Cincinnati, Ohio* Sear -hr I'asib&ehJ I have road with interest your paper with Kehoo and logon in the latest Journal of Ph&xrmoology end Ixporimaatal fhoraTxnvfcics and should ho grateful for a reprint* It Is unfortunate that you wore led to state that your data cast doubt upon ny conclusions* v/hon as a flatter of fact the data you reported are rathor lrr39$9Bjrb to those conclusions* Since I r.ip.y have failed to sort extent in leaking mysolf perfectly clear in ny paper on the lead citrate complex* perhaps I ray take this opportunity of clarifying the issue* by studying potontiometrically certain solutions of sodium citrate and load nitrate I was able to arrive at a formula and a dissociation constant (at the ionic strength and pH of plasm) for a lead citrate complex which I had previously shown to exist* From, the value for this constant and the norml citrate concentration in human blood it was possible to arrive at a value of about 20 for the ratios (lead citrate complex)/(lead ion)* To state it simply these data indicate that 20 tines as much load existed as a soluble lead citrate ion than as simple lead ion* Wince without knowledge of the presence of soluble complexes of lead in the blood all the soluble load must be in the form of the simple lead "on, 1 ;na able to state that ttthe normal blood citrate is capable of keeping in solution &n amount of load 20 times as groat as that which tho solubility of the insoluble lead compounds of tho body would otherwise permit* I do not soe how your findings of loss than 10.5 of tho blood lead in the serum ( a fact which I had always assumed as so on purely theoretical grounds) in any my casts doubt on or is even pertinent to my conclusion* Hot that I did not say that citrate of normal blood keeps 20 times as much lead in solution as in insoluble form* bote also that you I\avo no reason for assuming that blood, in plasma is in 3olution*&s a matter of fact there is good reason to fool that moot of the plasm lead is non-diffusib to* oven with 1,5 of tho lead of the blood present in the plasma there could still be 20 times as much lead wesent as the citrate complex than as simple lead ion In only one oaBe Jo your results approach pertinence to my conclusions* your experiment with citrate as on anti-coagulant* From purely theoretical considerations I should expect citrate to cause ail increase in plasm load at the expense of erythrocyte lead* but oven here a failure to observe such a redistribution would not reflect upon the validity of n?
Document imageDocument image
refid# 3JDmKrzdEeYZmydL7MBRRXR1O2 pages
Mo r a in e p r o d u c t s d iv is io n GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION DAYTON.
Document imageDocument image
refid# 6w0kjy0pZRVoj6LY0erGKxQ7E2 pages
Snue Brown transforms bedroom.
Document imageDocument image
refid# MMgE4gKpQVDd1ZMyaE6VrZ75j2 pages
February 10, 19kh 19 Dr.
Document image
refid# EQJbNMJ507Vk7jkkOQeZeVbb1 page
SMITH
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# pByx8kmDwR517ooaYK5qVaY0E14 pages
March 28, 1947 Dr.
Document image
refid# 82Z0abNRXyRGQ1Dg62xEbrKQm1 page
February 5, 1944 sr?
Document imageDocument image
refid# O37VOOLYdnDvz0gX1pzQdzzmX2 pages
February 5* 1944 19 Dr.
Document imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# KRq0wRmDYyev7qRQ76KZGvrbx3 pages