To: From: Sent: Subject: Jackson, Ryanfiackson.rvan@epa.qovl Ex. 6 - Personal Privacy .

Internal Correspondence rc: F.

/CM [ MODI Date 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 >cc- o < DC O <o < tr i r\ ( s cc < U. * < K H2 mo ill > (/) O o qj =!

Personal Email/Ex. 6 17cv1906 Sierra Club v.

Michelle Hale Executive Assistant to the Administrator Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, WJCS, Suite 3000 Washington, D.C. 20460 (202) 564-1430 Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged.

Please indicate your request for the topic of the Administrator's remarks, if applicable: Please list any special guests, elected officials, or other dignitaries who are invited or are Please list any other speakers at this event: Is this event open to the media?

To: Hupp, Sydney[hupp.sydney@epa.gov] Cc: Michael Merrifield?

The topic: Why And How We Can Limit The Federal Government Rep.

The Chameleon FEBRUARY 1901 VOLUME FOUR NUMBER TWO N23521 i The Chameleon.

WINCHESTER, MASS.

PCBs' Possible Link to Cancer in Humans Is Reported in Study of Mobil Corp.

(X)rnstrong insulations (A>m st ron gN LK-20 Block Insulation Vfot hcted equipment / Nv yp!

WILLIAMS' BMaaAciKd A FULL ALPHABETICAL RECORD OF THE NAMES OF THE INHABITANTS OF | '!

Inspection and Control Procedures petence in product safety, and should exer cise it Exposure to a moving part or danger ous chemical is fairly obvious, so is exposure to electrical fault, m most cases Safe packag ing and distributing of products should pose no problem for a qualified safety engineer, he should be called in to help Bases for claims The two bases upon which manufacturers of defective products are likely to be sued are negligence and breach of warranty, ex press or implied Small as well as large companies are vulnerable to these types of injury claims Manufacturers' responsibility for negli gence It is now generally recognized that manufacturers of goods may have a responsi bility to the consumer even though no direct relationship exists between them The duty is based on the fact that the manufacturer has made or sold goods which are likely to come into the hands of another and do harm if they are defective The consumer usually has a cause of action in negligence against the manufacturer, if There was a defect in the design or manufacture of the product which made it un reasonably dangerous, and The condition existed at the time that it left the seller's control, and The defect was the direct cause of the injury A cause of action in negligence may result from Failure to test to discover defects Inadequate or misleading directions for use Failure to give adequate warnings of possible danger to the user (In manv cases it would be prudent to warn of the dangers of improper use) Failure to explore the consequences of norma] wear, tear and abuse Manufacturers' responsibility for warranty There are several types of warranties imposed on (or assumed by) manufacturers A war ranty may be implied by law simply by virtue of the sale of the product, usually referred to as warranty of fitness and warranty of mer chantability Warranties may also be implied from the facts surrounding a transaction An example of this might be wording on labels, instruction pamphlets and even sales litera ture, any one of which might be found to imply warranties even though none were intended And of course, there is alwavs the obligation to abide by an obligation expresslv assumed Sometimes these express war ranties result in exposures unanticipated by the maker Strict liability of manufacturers.

280 OCCUPATIONAL TUMORS AND ALLIED DISEASES Lindenborn, K., Beitr. z. klin.