FILE NAME Dental Asbestos DEN DATE 2017 Feb DOC DEN007 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Journal Article - American Journal of Industrial Medicine - Malignant Mesothelioma Due to Asbestos Exposure in Dental Tape AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE Malignant Mesothelioma Due to Asbestos Exposure in Dental Tape Steven B.

FILE NAME Talc TALC DATE 2019 July DOC TALC187 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Public Health Then and Now Article - Nondetected- The Politics of Measurement of Asbestos in Talc 1971-1976 PUBLIC HEALTH THEN AND NOW Nondetected The Politics of Measurement of Asbestos in Talc 1971-1976 David Rosner PhD MPH Gerald Markowitz PhD and Merlin Chowkwanyun PhD MPH The recent lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson have raised the issue of what and when talcum powder manufacturers knew about the presence of asbestos in their products and what they did or did not do to protect the public level exposure to asbestos in talc is said to result in either mesothelioma or ovarian cancer Johnson & Johnson has claimed that there was no detectable asbestos in their products and that any possible incidental presence was too small to act as a carcinogen But what exactly does nondetected mean Here we examine the historical development of the argument that asbestos in talcum powder was nondetected We use a unique set of historical documents from the early 1970s when level pollution of talc with asbestos consumed the cosmetics industry We trace the debate over the Food and Drug Administration's efforts to guarantee that talc was up to 99.99 free of chrysotile and 99.9 free of amphibole asbestos Cosmetic talc powder manufacturers through their trade association pressed for a less stringent methodology and adopted the term nondetected rather than asbestos as a term of art Am J Public Health Published online ahead of print May 16 2019 e6 doi AJPH.2019.305085 "herecent lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson and particularly the 4.8 billion verdict against the company have raised the issue of what and when talcum powder manufac- turers knew about the presence of asbestos in their products and what they did or did not do to protect the public.,, Since the 1960s asbestos even at low levels has been recognized as a cause of lung cancer and mesothelioma Since the early 1970s the cosmetics industry as represented by the Cosmetic Toiletry and Fragrance Association CTFA has claimed that there was either no asbestos or that any residual asbestos in their products was nondetected But what exactly does nondetected mean Here we examine the historical devel- opment of the argument that asbestos in talcum powder was nondetectable We use a unique set of historical documents from the early 1970s when the Food and Drug Administration FDA raised concerns over findings of low level pollution of talc with asbestoWse trace the debate over the FDA's efforts to guarantee that talc was up to 99.99 free of chrysotile and 99.9 free of amphibole asbestos Talc pow- der companies counterproposals were less stringent they proposed methodologies that were capable of detecting asbestos up to 99.5 The difference in these methodologies meant that potentially billions of asbestos fibers could be released into the air when babies were powdered or adults powdered themselves Cosmetic talc powder manufacturers pressed for the less stringent methodology and adopted the term nondetected asbestos rather than asbestos- free as a term of art The CTFA the industry trade association which represented companies such as Johnson & Johnson Col- gate Pfizer Mennen Avon and other manufacturers of cosmetic talc products spearheaded the efforts to define how to measure asbestos in talc These contests over method- ology were enormously important They should be seen as part of parallel battles over operationalization of regulatory terms Since 1958 the FDA had been embroiled in controversy over proper interpretation of the so- called Delaney clause which banned approval of food additives that were carcinogenic But how exactly to define zero as historian Sarah Vogel puts it was far from evident and resulted in decades of debates over the clause's interpretation.

FILE NAME: Talc (TALC) DATE: 2010 DOC#: TALC126 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: IARC Report Vol 3 on Talc TALC NOT CONTAINING ASBESTIFORM FIBRES 1.

FILE NAME: Asbestos Cement Pipe and Sheet (ACPS) DATE: 2016 DOC#: ACPS097 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Unpublished Conference Presentation [Missing Pg. 62] - 20th Century Endorsements of Asbestos Filters and Pipe R achel P.

FILE NAME Household Contact HC DATE 2012 DOC HC056 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Legal - Affidavit of Barry Castleman AFFIDAVIT OF BARRY I.

FILE NAME Kohler KOH DATE 2019 DOC KOH001 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION List of Docs from Lanier Law Firm M Gmail Fwd Kohler 2 messages Barry Castleman barry.castleman@gmail.com To Albert Donnay albertdonnay@gmail.com Albert Please make new file Kohler with this mail and attachments Albert Donnay albertdonnay@gmail.com Fri Oct 25 2019 at 12:38 PM wnnnn-n--- Forwarded message --------- From Darron E.

FILE NAME: Engelhard (ENG) DATE: 2012 DOC#: ENG004 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Legal - Exhibit GG o f John T em plin 1 STEPHEN M.

FILE NAME: Warning Labels (WL) DATE: 2016 June DOC#: WL015 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Journal Article - A History of Industry1 Responsibility to Warn of Job Dangers before OSHA AJPH ' i :i C!

FILE NAME Brakes BRK DATE 2014 DOC BRK246 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Journal Article - Asbestos is Still a Health Problem Maanedsskrift for almen praksis 2014 1030-1038 Asbestos is still a health problem Rolf Petersen M.D.

FILE NAME Kubota KUB DATE 2010 DOC KUB027 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Legal - Defendant Kubota's Responses to Plaintiffs Requests for Admission Set One Thomas C.

FILE NAME: Hercules Chemical (HERC) DATE: 2011 Nov 16 DOC#: HERC035 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Legal - Deposition of Kendall Watson Patterson KENDALL WATSON PATTERSON Exhibit 46 BEFORE THE ASBESTOS MDL PRE-TRIAL JUDGE NO. 2010-50588 Page 1 MARTHA ANN GENSLER, Individually )IN THE DISTRICT COURT and as Personal Representative of ) the Estate of JOHN EDWARD GENSLER, )OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Deceased, Plaintiffs, vs .

FILE NAME: Square D(SQD) DATE: 2014 DOC#: SQD020 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Legal - Deposition of Redfield for Square D App#15 5Q U RREnCdM PRN Y INTER-OFFICE >* See Below -- L exington C.

FILE NAME: Riverside Cement (RVC) DATE: 2013 May 22 DOC#: RVC023 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Legal - Deposition of JN Stoss JOHN NICHOLAS STOSS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Page 1 Coordinated Proceeding Special Title Rule 3.550 LAOSD ASBESTOS CASES ALBERT FOX, an individual; and JANE FOX, an individual; Plaintiffs, vs .

FILE NAME: Mead (MEAD) DATE: 2011 DOC#: MEAD043 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Responses to Interrogations with Exhibits W E WASHINGTON & ERNSTER, PLLC M ickey L.

FILE NAME: Reichhold (REI) DATE: 2012 REI012 DOC#: RE 1012 DO CUM ENT DESCRIPTION: Legal-Excerpts from Testimony of TR Madden-pg 320-323 ' Page '320 1 A.