Refine
Estimated Years 2000-2009Clear
2,481 results foundRefine Search
ATTACHMENT TO LETTER OF JANUARY 30, 2002 3M FLUOROCHEMICAL SUBMISSION Back to Main Menu TOXICOLOGY, EPIDEMIOLOGY AND MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE STUDIES PFOS Perfluorooctanesulfonate Repeat Dose Studies 1.
Document imageDocument image
refid# OEy3gbZYLBrdOrMZab3yLajoM2 pages
r--- ----------- - Corporate Health Physics Corporate Occupational Medicine Corporate Product Responsibility Corporate Toxicology 3M Medical Department 3M Center, 220-2E-02 PO Box 33220 St.
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# Y9pjBmZ3QqO8NY83Mk6BmqpL8190 pages
ftp*JUlS - 63J .Dainippon Ink & Chemicals, Inc * Facsimile Transmission D A T E ............................. 21 th.
Document imageDocument image
refid# b5kamg6Y6OpMvk4qeEE4MxeYk2 pages
AU 2 6 - 63ST ?
Document imageDocument image
refid# 93eJOMbvz08OJZRYxkjd0VRYD2 pages
AH 26 BJORN.FR!
Document image
refid# NNm9Eqg5zE7GmMpXKexBdzRGD1 page
' 3M Specialty Materials -' ORIGINAL ^ 3M Center St.
Document imageDocument image
refid# NeBZ0rkr91BqLodZ9gnvK8jeQ2 pages
/ 9/ ?
Document imageDocument image
refid# Z8q10qjkYXvEoGvNQOb52vqO2 pages
3\1 General Offices 3M Center St.
Document imageDocument image
refid# 7MRXLDNOvgd1rLLM6mJokO5be2 pages
1060 Proceedings of the 49th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Chicago, Illinois, May 27-31, 2001 Determination of Anionic Perfluorinated Surfactants by LC ESI MS Melissa M.
Document imageDocument image
refid# NKr2J75bO89ene494vJoKG3D2 pages
^PRO 1 AZ 1 2 6 - I07Z UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 MAR 1 1 2002 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES Dear Interested Party: Attached please find copies of two related documents that published in today's Federal Register: a Final Rule (67 FR 11008) on 13 known discontinued perfluoroalkyl sulfonate (PFAS) chemicals making any new manufacture or importation a significant new use; and a Supplemental Proposed Rule (67 FR 11014) on 75 additional chemicals, proposing to exclude from the definition of "significant new use" specifically defined, low volume, controlled exposure uses in semiconductor manufacture, aviation hydraulics, and photography, but to otherwise require submission of a significant new use notice (SNUN) for any manufacture or import of these chemicals after December 31, 2002.
Document imageDocument image
refid# Ne9Nm8kkKVqNvMjoQJQM9pmLD2 pages
NORTHERN KENTUCKY OFFICE SUITE 340 1717 DIXIE HIGHWAY COVINGTON.
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# x5nYKzbpp1v18z92J8kB56e8J4 pages
2003 JUL- 7 AM10:59 \ # f(f0 2 May 2003 ?.
Document image
refid# 5K3Lxr4DN511rj73NLv7v4nJ1 page
6; . m-78 A Simple, Conservative Compartmental Model to Relate Ammonium Perfluorooctanoate (APFO) Exposure to Estimates of Perfluorooctanoate (PFO) Blood Levels in Humans Paul M.
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# QJmkoqrkv3BRX5K97Q4XOyzyE10 pages
70 PP AR226-1534 DUPONT TELOMER MANUFACTURING SITES: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PFOA LEVELS IN AIR AND WATER RECEIVED OPPT NCIC 2003 OCT-15 AM 8:10 Date: September 2003 Project No.: 508501 18983843.00003 CORPORATE REMEDIATION GROUP An Alliance between DuPont and URS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 DuPont Telomer Manufacturing Sites: Environmental Assessment of PFOA Levels In Air and Water Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.......................................................................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................1 1.1 Chambers Works...............................................................................................1 1.2 Washington Works........................................................................................... 2 2.0 Data Analysis and Analytical Reporting....................................................................3 3.0 Air Dispersion Modeling.............................................................................................4 3.1 chambers Works - ISC3 Modeling Methodology and Results....................... 4 3.1.1 Emission Source Information...............................................................4 3.1.2 Modeling Methodology.......................................................................4 3.1.3 Modeling Results................................................................................. 4 3.2 Washington Works - Screen3 Modeling Methodology andResults..................6 3.2.1 Data and Modeling Procedures............................................................6 3.2.2 Modeling Results................................................................................. 8 4.0 Chambers Works Groundwater Sampling..................................................................9 4.1 Background....................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Regional Geology............................................................................................ 9 4.3 Site Geology..................................................................................................... 9 4.4 Site Hydrogeology........................................................................................... 10 4.5 Sample Location Selection...............................................................................11 4.6 Sampling Activities and Results..................................................................... 11 4.7 Summary of Results....................................................................................... 12 5.0 Chambers Works Surface Water Sampling.............................................................. 14 5.1 Site Effluent Sample Results............................................................................14 5.2 Chambers Works and Upstream Surface Water IntakeResults........................14 5.3 Delaware River Surface Water Sampling........................................................15 5.3.1 Delaware River - Discussion of Results..............................................16 5.4 Salem Canal......................................................................................................17 5.5 Summary of Results......................................................................................... 17 6.0 Conclusions............................................................................................................. 18 7.0 References............................................................................................................... 19 EnvironmentalAssessment.doc Oct. 1,03 Wilmington, DE i DuPont Telomer Manufacturing Sites: Environmental Assessment of PFOA Levels In Air and Water Table of Contents Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Table 10 Table 11 Table 12 Table 13 Table 14 TABLES CATT Established Screening Levels.........................................................vi Summary of Air Dispersion Modeling Results......................................... vi Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results-ChambersWorks............... vi Summary of Surface Water Sampling Results-Chambers Works............ vi Chambers Works Stack Parameters and Emission Rates............................5 Chambers Works Building Heights............................................................ 5 Chambers Works Site Air Dispersion Modeling Results............................6 Chambers Works Telomers Operations Air Dispersion Modeling Results6 Washington Works GEP Stack Heights......................................................7 Chambers Work Groundwater Analytical Results................................... 12 Chambers Works Outfall DSN001 Results............................................. 14 Chambers Works Surface Water Intake Results...................................... 15 Chambers Works Delaware River Sampling, June 9, 2003........................ .....................................................................................
Document imageDocument imageDocument imageDocument image
refid# LJd65Env4gyjx5x15Ge26gR5w70 pages
31 October 2003 To: Mary F.
Document image
refid# 0yq0aBkYpxRKdwRmKjOdwZyb1 page