As I mentioned in my first letter, I have been following the employees of this plant for six or seven years and have seen no case of what I would consider serious lead poisoning.

I have always used the same organisation to investigate lead levels in children and I am glad to say that the investigations that I have been able to do with some money provided by the company, proved quite frank cases of lead poisoning in children was not due to atmospheric contamination but was due in every case to paint, water and particularly, as has come out recently, from improperly glazed earthenware jugs.

For our own information I plotted the rates of uptake of lead and zinc in the various waters and I am sending this graph along for your information.

Like you, I remember v iv id ly trie u n fo rtu n ate s e r ie s of lead poisoning c a s e s found i n v a rio u s Navy y a r d s .

Here, as in the case of tetraethyl lead poisoning, I am much more concerned with prevention than with therapy, although I am certainly not lacking in interest in a satisfactory therapy.

How ever, we wished to be perfectly certain of her status before considering this as anything other than lead poisoning.

Here, as in the case of tetraethyl lead poisoning, I am much more concerned with prevention than with therapy, although I am certainly not lacking in interest in a satisfactory therapy. .

It nay be necessary under certain circumstances to label the outside of the package with either a poisonous or inflammable label, or both.

It is a most unusual thing to discover, lead poisoning, as the result of the use of badly glazed pottery vessels, in the population of the United States.

Here, as in the case of tetraethyl lead poisoning, I am much more concerned with prevention than with therapy, although I am certainly not lacking in interest in a satisfactory therapy.

We have seen several cases of poisonings on this account, and similar cases have been reported (correctly or incorrectly as the case may be) by others.

Beriti6*s paper on the general subject of "lead Poisoning" was not believed to be suitable for publication.

One feels that there cannot be any doubt that this individual died as a result of chronic alcoholism, plus tetraethyl lead poisoning.

J^sibly a^a coincidence, the record shows that all poison ings have odcfered^Sirthin companies of the so-called 9Standard9 group.

In th e p re lim in a ry work o f m anufacture o f le a d t e t r a e t h y l sev era l very serious cases of lead poisoning have re s ta te d .