As a general rule, it is not considered necessary to make tests e^efty time the men are examined; in fact, it is our present nding thg/tf these tests are not necessary unless an individual has er symptoms of lead-poisoning ana, of course, should you run across an 'Individual in that condition, you would naturally notify us irnmedi^etj^and w\_w^uld probably ask you at that time to conduct the necessary uiftn^sari&dysis \p>support your previous diag nosis, but nothing like this shouldNobv o^ne in the general routine examina tions which you carry out each quai^ei [iscussions with you, it was agreed that we would pay you a standard fee of\5\Vguilders per year for your work on our behalf, and it was expected that suet ?
refid# X74ZBrBjLM2K0kKajMVDDBNpR1 page
Kehoe, Dnivsrsity of Cincinnati, jollege of .Deficiue D' r.cinnati ,Chic -.ear Doctor: One of our examining physicians recently examined this claimant v:ho claims to have had t'-ro attacks of lead poisoning.
refid# Ne4n45Lp9Ke6q89kO1NZaRo6g1 page
September 3, 1964 Professor Sir Alan Moncrieff Institute of Child Health The Hospital for Sick Children Great Ormond Street London, W.C. 1, England Dear Sir Alan: Please accept my thanks for your reply to my letter of some weeks ago, concerning lead poisoning.
refid# RvB1Mreq1gyNyyvG9VbOzNeX1 page
Kettering Laboratory of Applied Physiology College of Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati 19, Ohio Rear Rob: Herewith Is a reprint of an article on lead poisoning of cattle, which was among a considerable file of items awaiting my attention upon my arrival Mere.
refid# zoRx2JYqLVBMExjGJN6qg1VQg1 page
Contents poisonous.
refid# V3xwbOwMvgVb0q26eyvJOveao1 page
It is possible that we may somewhat rarely have requests for lead analysis and tissue, urine, and feces.
refid# N9KMBvzkDn6MGmbR4mkpNovg2 pages
Belknap 251 West Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee* Wisconsin Beat`S doctor-Belknap J I have jour letter of March gth inquiring &3 to the possibility of my appearance a5 an expert witness in a. case of alleged lead poison ing. 1 am very busy at present and 2 would prefer not to appear as an expert witness.
refid# V1Z95v0EGbnqe5YEXdjGErM41 page
As a general rule, it is not considered necessary to make thass tests e^e'isy time the men are examined; in fact, it is our present undeahabanding tfrgX these tests are not necessary unless an individual has a^jNjbtper symptoms of lead-poisoning ana,CHIU,j oCri coUuir-OseC,j shouldOii'w'UJ.U. yJUoUu iruuun aabcirUobsas dii j^vidual in that condition,iUJ.U.iJi X U.U.C1X i l l 0lid.1/ V-UliUlblUli) yyo\ u would naturally noti`f'y us irnmedi^tfet^and w\_w^uld probably ask you at tinlat time t o conrduuct vthe nece-ossoaariyj uivinfe^arihAysis Xu-*support your previous d"i'a{ nosis, but nothing like this shouidNb' e in the general routine examina tions which you carry out each quaXfce in toiyvaiseussions with you, it was agreed that we would pay you a standard fee or^Kkgdiiiders per year for your work on our behalf, and it was expected that suchrefe would cover any work you might do with the exception of any special worxVa-^iay ask your assistance upon.
refid# GZ1be1L1g3a8K1QM12wv6BOx1 page
I may say, however, that I consider it very unlikely that you have suffered any injury of a permanent sort as the result of any exposure to gasoline containing tetraethyl lead.
refid# BRVVxjM2RMM6jzwzdwG8ObkNm1 page
'etra lead poisoning.
refid# qmaVOYnLOv9n99zR9a989dQMn1 page
Kahoe College of Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio Dear Doctor Kahoe: On March 12, 1929, you furnished us * very comprehensive and sympathetic statement of your study of the case of who since about June, 1924, has berxWHHSnfflj^^^^^Wl and psychic consequence of tetraethyl lead poisoning at that ti~o.
refid# mpDkv1n10e1XqZYMzZ52yLkzk1 page
This sounds like one of those rather typical affairs in which the man in question has not had adequate clinical study and in which, therefore, the easy way out has been to make the diagnosis of lead poisoning.
refid# kDza2zKObOBqYbvRXYr6qR1Qy1 page
-ear Doctor* One of our examining physicians recently examined this claimant -;:ho cl ains to have had two attacks of lead poisoning. the symptoms which he now presents ana the onset cf his attacks cf illness -.lakes the diagnosis and dir nullity somewhat questionable.- f" discussing this clairo with the examiner it was suggested `has the claimant be referred to you for examination and opinion.
refid# RpOX3N3z86159V25xnKx42YQB1 page
I am very sorry for all of the difficulties in connection with the cases of lead poisoning in California.
refid# 3JXgxOyDYXRYLN21mQDermX461 page
I am very sorry that I forgot to ask you a question while you were here, and that is your own rationale relative to therapy in acute and chronic lead poisoning.
refid# wOGEd5q8B1QpqN2e1vKOnGJo1 page