I know that they have had no information from me except some questions that were asked' me concerning lead poisoning in general.

(now titled a SARCO) as to insist upon the principle of biological testing of employees as an unavoidably necessary measure of security against lead poisoning.

af lead on the e&ortsto* It 1 totter, of eaurse, not to ssafse Ito analyse# at all* t?

the records of the oases of lead poisoning treated at the Children's and Cinoinnati General Hospitals as com piled by Dr, Smith.

af lead on the e&ortsto* It 1 totter, of eaurse, not to ssafse Ito analyse# at all* t?

Clinically, this does not appear to baa ease of lead poisoning.

corning H rt^ M H B B ^ llln e ss* 1 am n o t q u ite s u re about th e d e t a i l s o f th e case and I em sure you w ill understand why, I do not t ake too s e rio u s ly the d e s c rip tio n o f Mr Illn e ss as conveyed to a by a layman* However# the p o in t o f my l e t t e r is th a t Mr* Murdock s ta te d th a t you were in* teres ted inknew lng whether o r hot I believed th a t the patient* illn e s s might he d ire c tly or in d ire c tly a consequence of lead exposure in h is occupation* i n as Much as a l l the evidence in d icates ^xat the very minute q u an tity of lead in g aso lin e does n o t rceessu ltt in lead ab so rp tio n and lead poisoning# I was somewhat disposed t o doubt i f you had suspected the occurrence of sig n ific a n t lead absorption in th is case* Fori th a t reason and because the pressure of o th e r work h as eauwM^iM.dtO'iieglhCt -ny coxae'spondenoe# I have been somewhat slow in w ritin g to you* However, i f : there i s any^aspect o f the case which you would lik e to p resen t to me# and I f t h e r e l s any inform ation which I can give you in connection w ith the lead exposure side of the m atter# I should b e very glad to do i t * I f you would drop me a lin e # g iv in g me the necessary inform ation about the case and r a is in g any questions which you may have in . m, ind7, X s h-a*ll -do ^mwy b e s t to answer them "mti Very tr u ly yours# - " ~t?'

It will be picked up b y every enthusiastic physician as a treatment for lead poisoning, and it will be usod instead of prophylaxis.

(now titled a SARCO) as to insist upon the principle of biological testing of employees as an unavoidably necessary measure of security against lead poisoning.

Committee on Lead Poisoning), as yet unpublished, for such use as it may be to you in its present form.

As a result of these studies we arc quite sure that If the equipment Is kept in order, and If the sen carry out their work in accordance with the regulations, there will b no lead exposure or lead poisoning, and there' will be no abnormal results in the analyses of excreta. 2 do not wish to discourage you on this account from asking any tests which you feel are necessary to inform yourself properly as to the occu pational lead exposure of m n under your supervision* Consequently X feel it will b entirely proper for you to' 'have these analyses- sad once a year if you wish and pass the coat of these on as you did before* My only query in the matter has to do with the accuracy of the analyses which arc carried out. 2 should be very much He 00133?

as.a consequence of their exposure* I would confidently expect that under these conditions cases of lead poisoning might 5 your part is this direction .

Third, the clinical picture in this instance, while not entirely charac teristic, and not In itself justifying the diagnosis of lead poisoning, is nevertheless, compatible with the toxic effects of lead.

Dear Doctor Smith: I am pleased to give you a brief account of the occurrence of the two cases of lead poisoning referred to in your letter of January 15th.

Dear Doctor Smith: I ara pleased to give you a brief account of the occurrence of the two cases of lead poisoning referred to in your letter of January 15th.