Refine
Estimated Years
1900-1909 (1222)1910-1919 (1849)1920-1929 (2678)1930-1939 (8921)1940-1949 (11527)1950-1959 (14527)1960-1969 (16810)1970-1979 (27937)1980-1989 (14918)1990-1999 (5222)2000-2009 (6589)2010-2019 (342)2020-2029 (67)Undated (92592)
205,201 results foundRefine Search
1 please.
Document image
refid# z3z5DE8OrX69vN7DrnrjObVm1 page
Page 1749 1 Which would mean if you had a sugar size 2 cube of lung tissue, size of a sugar cube, and you did 3 a digestion on that and found out how much asbestos 4 was in it, you would have 20 of these asbestos bodies, 5 which would be a single asbestos fiber coated with 6 iron and protein in a single cube of tissue. 7 Most women who never had history.of exposure 8 to asbestos, we don't find any. 9 What I have always said, if I had a case of 10 an individual who had mesothelioma who had less than 11 that background, I could not attribute the 12 mesothelioma to that. 13 The problem is that I think the 14 mesothelioma, and I think this is well documented in 15 the literature, is a type of cancer caused by asbestos 16 which it takes very little asbestos to cause, and I 17 think that is well accepted, well proven. 18 So with respect to is there a safe level to 19 which a person could be exposed, I would say, 20 generally if I was in that situation, I would say no, 21 there isn't any safe level because it takes so little
Document image
refid# yknVLvE54D9jqovXO6o4waaMD1 page
1 A Yes.
Document image
refid# ZdEDK7goNKLgbRVgV9e96o301 page
Page 2191 1 that conclusion that asbestos pipecovering was a safe 2 _ occupation; am I right?
Document image
refid# 37Qe87e4vBxJjr54YGVnKwMLD1 page
1 order.
Document image
refid# Xz9mRpEZoavEwqyE4KzOYn7MB1 page
1 you general questions first.
Document image
refid# NEgzow4b3wxDj7LVrr69yKvbb1 page
1 .it had to be read and then had to have no disease on Page 2061 2 the chest X-ray. 3 If you had disease, then you were not 4 allowed to work in the industry.
Document image
refid# ZwwYXjK5Ban8zn9mJypNZKmd1 page
Page 2139 1 Now, Dr.
Document image
refid# NEV6JLGYBg2DN9100OQZvojJE1 page
Page 2259 1 of the things that Fleischer-Drinker did was they went 2 to the shipyards, four different shipyards where the 3 naval ships and other ships were being constructed and 4 they took dust measurements,correct?
Document image
refid# YjXExLXr3vo4bK34G6qOLzv6V1 page
1 was OCF's Multitemp.
Document image
refid# MJaGYzbzQjJkpE3qxg7Eep6471 page
1 professorship; is that correct?
Document image
refid# jB5xNkxEezxmdw3MxOnwYq2rp1 page
1 A Let's take the part that you didn't Page 2554 2 underline .
Document image
refid# VKxB0DgKXmbpLwxgbpNxjEoON1 page
1 that the Jean Vandergucht case was filed on November Page 2758 2 8th, 1991. 3 THE COURT: Any objection?
Document image
refid# zz70XM2yvOo5v57ybq0j0JnD61 page
Page 2352 1 and had to work while I was going to school, and I was 2 almost 30 years old, had two kids and no family money 3 and it was clear going to medical school in those days 4 was not in it.
Document image
refid# 8RY0v49yaMoEn7Roy3EYzJM2m1 page
1 Q Do you know why they would be there?
Document image
refid# OEBJBXKxdzYqnKnEpXg786YQ1 page