NlO mXC * Monsanto moinamjiocahoniC.

1 PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT , ^ ^ ^ S/Oft r * s 4 w- ^7 sc 000248 LAA//OOI445 1 COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL I JRA/GOALS SC 000249 LaM001446 SC 000250 LA1VI001447

Monsanto ra ihaw i iocation} --1y-------------- C.

PROCEDURE BULLETIN --TEXAS CITY PLANT P-0120 LOCKOUT PROCEDURE I.

PROCEDURE BULLETIN .

.

' / \<' ` . .

VERIFICATION I, Ernie Dodman, am an employee of Dana Corporation and have been duly authorized to make this verification on its behalf.

.it *4 - H ii .

1# 4 \' MINUTES OF SHAC COMMITTEE MEETING April 14, 1976 Present: Members: Harold Lacy, Chairman Clyde Hebert Jim Cavender John Tissue Gene Stacy Arnold Glass Phil Brubaker (part-time) PLANT MANAGER'S COMMENTS -- P.

information contained in all the records and documents that might be responsive to this interrogatory.

INTERROGATORY NO. 84: As to any knowledge or information referred to in Interrogatories 79-83, did Defendant, at any time, educate or inform its employees, distributors, purchasers or any persons working in the vicinity where any asbestoscontaining product was being applied or installed as to the hazards known to Defendant or about which Defendant had information, and as to the safety precautions necessary to guard against cancer and other diseases arising from the use and handling of the products identified in response to Interrogatory No. 19?

INTERROGATORY NO. 130: Was this Defendant ever allowed to use the trademark or logo { of any other company, including but not limited to, its predecessor or related company, on any products Defendant sold, distributed or installed, and if so please state: (a) The trademark or iogo used by you; (b) The company allowing such use of its trademark or logo; (c) The time period such use was allowed: (d) Whether such use was by written, verbal or implied agreement: (e) Each and every product such trademark or logo was placed upon; (f) Identify all documents which refer to, relate to or reflect the use of such trademark or logo.

Page 130 1 Q Now have you asked Ford or General Motors or 2 Chrysler how many prior claims they have had where 3 individuals with mesothelioma with no other known 4 exposure to asbestos brought lawsuits against them?

1 I'm quite surprised.