Questions about Dana's vehicular products are not relevant and are not calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant and admissible information.

Questions about Dana's vehicular products are not relevant and are not calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant and admissible information.

Questions about Dana's vehicular products are not relevant and are not calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant and admissible information.

Buy lead, oil and color.

LEAD POZBOHJO Although th* recognition of lead poisoning as a dlseass data* back to antiquity, and despite the feet that lte causes and control are wall understood, ywt, as Or.

LIA079E9 y.WV LEAD INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION M LBOIM70N tVM NSW row 17.

-d Technical latter <o 7 - Red lead Teohnioal letter do* 6 *H * Red lead Technical letter Re, J~---------- y - Bed Lead Technical letter Ro. 10 b - Metal Protective Red lead Paint* 1 - Federal Specification TT-P-SAa 4 Red lead Paint* for 'Talvanited Surfao#i State.

H and1 Ida of Lead Compounds!

Gentlemen:--Wc take pleasure in recommending your line of ixdnts to one who con templates adding paint to his stock or is now selling lead am!

If we add the zinc to the lead and the barytes it will be almost impossible to get a uniform mixture, while if the lead and barytes are added to the zinc, the work is compara tively easy.

NO. 811/5 O e TrI--J* I > KB 001333'; o r p && VS ^\>C' $ \ I t Report on medical examination of men from Lose Brothers, Inc* plant at Layton, Ohio exposed to lead, silica, silicates and volatile solvents* Lead exposure eighteen men exposed to lead dust at tne plant of Lowe Brothers, Inc., at Dayton, dhio were examined at the Kettering Laboratory in august, Iplpb.

NO. 811/5 O e TrI--J* I > o r p && VS ^\>C' $ \ I t Report on medical examination of men from Lose Brothers, Inc* plant at Layton, Ohio exposed to lead, silica, silicates and volatile solvents* Lead exposure eighteen men exposed to lead dust at tne plant of Lowe Brothers, Inc., at Dayton, dhio were examined at the Kettering Laboratory in august, Iplpb.

Defendant further objects to this request because it fails to describe with MW/102921 -6- reasonable particularity the item or category of items sought to be inspected as required by Rule 196.1 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and because it seeks matters that are not relevant to the subject matter of this lawsuit or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

ICRC expressly objects to each and every discovery request to the extent that it seeks any information in those cases wherein a special appearance is pending for the reason that such discovery requests are not related to any special appearance motion or likely to lead to the discovery of evidence admissible in a special appearance hearing.

Chesterton Company, objects to this interrogatory as it is overly broad, vague, ambiguous, burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.