ll PRINSCO ENGINEERED WITH INTEGRITY _TECHNICAL NOTE POLYPROPYLENE CHEMICAL RESISTANCE Introduction Among many of the positive attributes of polypropylene, it is probably best known for its resistance to highly aggressive chemicals.

Attachment 2_Taking a long time for development of future alternative materials in printer & copier Need a huge time to phase-out PFAS used for printers EVEN IF the substitute material of PFAS is available in the future The substitute materials instead of PFAS to fulfil for many of necessary functions required in printing process is not available yet.

onAR R AR AGRSEN -- 15 2 - 000200 | ARARG - 3H!

"Coming together is a beginning, working together is a success."

% mass loss Plasma Exposure Time PTFE Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5 0h 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2h 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 4h 0% 4% 4% 3% 3% 4% 6h 0% 6% 7% 5% 5% 6% 8h 0% 9% 10% 7% 7% 8% 10h 0% 11% 12% 9% 9% 9% 12h 0% 14% 15% 11% 11% 11% 14h 0% 16% 18% 12% 13% 13% 16h 0% 18% 22% 14% 15% 14% % mass loss 1.200 1.000 0.800 0.600 0.400 0.200 0.000 0 PTFE 1 2 Alternative 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 Plasma exposure time [h] Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 9 10 Alternative 5

TSCA SANITIZED p. 1 A~~ W lesearcti ab:omtories _ ... . . ~-~:. d P:O:.BiDx,178 :Spinrle~s~botiy~; PA;1~968 -ph'~e'~ti4~.~-41:10 fa9t'(215):6364818 Study T146 :: Test .Articlo : -Positive Control : Vehtcte : Author Study Completed.

Pilot-Scale Fluoropolymer Incineration Study: Thermal Treatment of a Mixture of Fluoropolymers under Representative European Municipal Waste Combustor Conditions Dr.

Fluororesin Products for Manufacturing Processes of Synthetic alcohol.

Evaluation of Chemicals and Risk Management Friedrich-Henkel-Weg 1 - 25 D - 44149 Dortmund, Germany phone: fax: e-mail: 2

AHachment Z \ \ Gd 12/1445 SCOStrategic Plan Key Action Lor > MAJORVISIONOBSTACLE#1 Cb eles" I i) ""PPRRIIMMAARRIILLYY BBEECCAAUUSSEE OOFF TTHHEE PPEERRSSIISSTTEENNCCEE OOFF FFLLUUOORROO-- :p--oly~' J CCHHEEMMIICCAALLSS,, EENNVVIIRROONNMMEENNTTAALL,, HHEEAALLTTHH,, SSAAFFEETTYY AANNDD RREEGGUULLAATTOORRYY IISSSSUUEESS AANNDD TTRREENNDDSS TTHHRREEAATTEENN TTOO LLIIMMIITT OOUURR BBUUSSIINNEESSSS.".'

AACCUUTTEE TTOOXXIICCIITTYY TTOO FFIISSHH ((BBLLUUEEGGIILLLL SSUUNNFFIISSHH)) TI ESTE SUBSs TANCT E suBSTANCE IIddeennttiittyy:: AAremfmiexrixtrteuudrrteeoccaoosnnttPaaiFinnOiinSngg, ppFeeCr-rff9llu5uo,orrooorooccattsaannaeescsuoulmlffpoononanateteen,,twwhohfiiccFhhC-mm2a0ay3y.aall(ss1oo-bbee OOreccftetaarnrneeesdsuultoflfooannsiiccPaFaccOiiddS)), ((FCCCAA-SS95##, o2277r99a65s--3a399-c-3o3)m).. ponent of FC-203. (1- RiRseeFmmCa-ra2kr0ks3s.:: CuTTrhrheeen3t3MMinpfporrroomddauutccittoiiononninllodotitcnnauutemmsbbieetrirswwaaassminnxoottutrnneoototeefdd1...T3T4hh%ee ttPeeFssOttSss,aamm3plp6el%e: dSdisiuieelFttthChoyy-n2lleee0nnf3eeo.aggmClleyyurccro,orlel3nbb%ututtiyynsllfooeedrttimhhueeamrrt,,ioo33cnt77y..iln88d5s5ui%cl%faawwtteaeast,teeir0tr,,.is122a%00%m%soieexdtttiuhhuryyemlleeolnnafeeu1rggy.l3llyy4ccs%ouolll,f,Pa22tF.e.6,O666San%%, d35% 00S..u00l5t5o%%nettooflloyyalttrmriiaaezzroo,llee3.o% sodium octyl sulfate, 0.1% sodium lauryl sulfate, and TcThhhaeeraffooclltlloeorwwiiiznneggd sscouunmmcmm eanatrrryyataaippoppnllsiieoefssittmoopuaarm miitixixtetuusrr.ee Dwwaiittthha iimnnaccyoom mnpopltleetatecelclyyurately reflect toxicity of the fluorochemical component of the test sample. characterized concentrations of impurities.

~ 33MM CCoommppaannyy SStt..

[ Minnesota Pollution Control Agency www.pca.state.mn.us CICnhMhiananrerasoactact,etaerwarisitssemttaiiyccbeHHhaazaazzrdaaourrsfddorooauussonftWWheeaseasrsetatseoensss: In Mindneissoptal,aayawsahsatzeamrdaoyusbewahsatzearcdhoaurascftoerriosntiecof these reasons: ts record It displaysead: none of hazardous wfoausrtescthoasfrahcatetarirsdtiocus waste the KF, , oU rList IItt cisonretacionrsdepdolinycohnoerionfaftoeudrbliispthseonyf 'hsaz(aPCrdBos)us waste -the K, F, P, or U List ThisdoItccuomnetnatinsdipscoulyscsehslotrihneasteixdchbairpahcetneryilsst(iPcCsBtsh)a can maakwasete Hazardous.

[[DoAATTEE]] [[NNAAMMEE]] [[AADDDDRREESSSS]] {{CCmITsY,TSATATTEE,ZZIIPP)] ReRe:: WWeellll AAddvviissoorryy ffoorr wweellll wwiitthh MMiinnnneessoottaa UUnniiqquuee WWeellll NNuummbbeerr [[UUNN]] llooccaatteedd aatt [[AADDDDRREESSSS,,CCIITTYY]] DDeeaarr [[NNAAMMEE]]: `TThhee MMiinnnneessoottaa DDeeppaarrttmmeennttooff HHeeaalltthh ((MMDDHH)) hhaass jjuusstt ccoommpplleetteedd aa rreevviieeww ooff iittss hheeaalltthh--bbaasseedd vvaalluueess ffoorr ttwwoo ppeerrfflluuoorroocchheemmiiccaallss ((PPFFCCss)) -- ppeerrfflluuoorrooooccttaannee ssuullffoonnaattee ((PPFFOOSS)) aanndd ppeerrfflluuoorrooooccttaannooiicc aacciidd ((PPFFOORA)) -- iinn ddrriinnkkiinngg wwaateter.r.

PFAS Restriction Proposal Presented by: Audun Heggelund, Norwegian Environment Agency 1 Restriction proposal - content REACH = Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and restriction of CHemicals Restriction proposal: Chemical identity Hazards, risks, effects Applications Availability of alternatives Socio-economic analysis - impact assessment 2 Preparation May - July 2020 Call for evidence July 2021 - Oct 2021 2nd stakeholder consultation Oct 2021 - Jan 2023 Drafting of proposal Stakeholder interviews, literature search, meetings Jan 2020 First meeting 13 January 2023 Submission of proposal 7 February 2023 Publication of proposal 3 Restriction process - next steps Public Consultation, 22 March - 25 September 2023 ECHA's scientific committees: Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) Decision by the Commission together with the member states, expected 2025/26 4 Next steps - key messages Dossier amendments are made on the basis of information submitted to the Public Consultation Well-substantiated scientific evidence is key: Alternatives, impacts (costs and benefits), missed uses, tonnages and emissions, R&D efforts, etc.