1 these cases, didn't he?

Page 3546 1 Isn't it also true that in the Teta study -- * 2 A Teta. 3 Q Teta, thank you -- the proportions or the 4 proportion, excuse me, of mesotheliomas not associated 5 with some form of asbestos exposure was about 15 6 percent?

1.

Page 3673 1 It says primarily occupational exposures. 2 (Whereupon, laughter ensued.) 3 Q Which means that the source of the asbestos 4 exposure from brake linings is in an occupational 5 setting -6 A Absolutely, kidding aside. 7 Q rather than necessarily being out on the 8 street when somebody is coming to a stop at a stop 9 sign?

Page 3780 1 I am not persuaded that I ought not submit 2 that to the trier of fact. 3 As both of these cases have been presented, 4 they have been presented under two possible theories. 5 One of negligence and one of strict 6 liability.

1 was so shut down by the opacification and the tumor Page 3944 2 running, that he couldn't breathe with the fluids 3 through his lung. 4 THE LAW CLERK: Five minutes, counsel. 5 MR.

Page 3964 1 this, I thought maybe it makes some sense to see what 2 the plaintiffs' own experts had to say about the five 3 reasons that I talked about with you in opening 4 statement. 5 After all, the experts I put on are going to 6 agree with those reasons, but what I did was I went 7 back and looked at the trial transcript to see what 8 the plaintiffs' own experts had to say on these 9 points, and it is interesting, in a lot of instances 10 they agreed with those five reasons. 11 Now, I want to be very clear with you.

1 them out to begin their deliberations.

Page 1749 1 Which would mean if you had a sugar size 2 cube of lung tissue, size of a sugar cube, and you did 3 a digestion on that and found out how much asbestos 4 was in it, you would have 20 of these asbestos bodies, 5 which would be a single asbestos fiber coated with 6 iron and protein in a single cube of tissue. 7 Most women who never had history.of exposure 8 to asbestos, we don't find any. 9 What I have always said, if I had a case of 10 an individual who had mesothelioma who had less than 11 that background, I could not attribute the 12 mesothelioma to that. 13 The problem is that I think the 14 mesothelioma, and I think this is well documented in 15 the literature, is a type of cancer caused by asbestos 16 which it takes very little asbestos to cause, and I 17 think that is well accepted, well proven. 18 So with respect to is there a safe level to 19 which a person could be exposed, I would say, 20 generally if I was in that situation, I would say no, 21 there isn't any safe level because it takes so little

1 order.

1 you general questions first.

1 .it had to be read and then had to have no disease on Page 2061 2 the chest X-ray. 3 If you had disease, then you were not 4 allowed to work in the industry.

Page 2259 1 of the things that Fleischer-Drinker did was they went 2 to the shipyards, four different shipyards where the 3 naval ships and other ships were being constructed and 4 they took dust measurements,correct?

1 was OCF's Multitemp.

1 professorship; is that correct?