- Ref.

Quartalsbericht 1.2020 DIE WIRTSCHAFTLICHE LAGE DER CHEMISCH-PHARMAZEUTISCHEN INDUSTRIE Globale Wirtschaft: C hemienachfrage ausgebremst Chemieproduktion: Nur vorbergehend erholt Erzeugerpreise: Druck nimmt zu Chemieumsatz: Inland im Plus Beschftigung: Arbeitnehmerzahl stabil Ausblick: Branche steht schweres Jahr bevor Chemie robust ins Krisenjahr 2020 gestartet Die chemisch-pharmazeutische Industrie in Deutschland hat die Corona-Pandemie im ersten Quartal 2020 noch nicht mit voller Wucht zu spren bekommen.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: | DUH GUERSENT Olivier (COMP); JUUL-JOERGENSEN Ditte (ENER); MARQUEZ URIARTE Tatiana (CAB-SIMSON); FINK-HOOIJER Florika (ENV); BURSI Camilla (CAB-SINKEVICIUS); JORNA Kerstin (GROW); CANTON Joan (CAB-BRETON); WEYAND Sabine (TRADE); BELTRAMELLO Andrea (CAB-DOMBROVSKIS); (ENER); (GROW); (TRADE); SATUNAS Simonas (CAB-SINKEVICIUS); CLIMA LIFE; NELEN Sarah (CAB-TIMMERMANS); VANDENBERGHE Kurt (CAB-VON DER LEYEN) | DUH; | DUH; | DUH Revision of the EU F-Gas-Regulation: Ban SF6 from our future energy supply lundi 21 mars 2022 19:33:46 Ban SF6 from our future energy supply.pdf DUH Background paper SF6.pdf Dear Members of the European Commission, I would like to draw your attention to the subject of SF6, which is the most potent greenhouse gas in the world, widely used in the power grid.

i om ce Ey -- Online meeting with ESIA on semiconductors in PFAS - 14/06/2022, 14:30-15:30 cc EE cE oe] EE ciobsrouncics, EE os cov I EE coco I PFAS across the semiconductor industry (see attached presentation).

lime Minutes Meeting06/04w/it2hA02S2R cel insite) prin) Secretaria) 200), FRA) TI I o.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.5.2023 C(2023) 3433 final Ms Vicky Cann Corporate Europe Observatory Rue d'Edimbourg 26 1050 Brussels DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4 OF THE IMPLEMENTING RULES TO REGULATION (EC) NO 1049/2001 1 Subject: Corrigendum to Commission Decision C(2023)1509 concerning your confirmatory application for access to documents under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - 2022/5765 Dear Ms Cann, I refer to the European Commission Decision C(2023)1509, adopted on 27 February 2023 and sent to you on the same date.

Ref.

MECHA REACH Restriction process EPEE APPLIA Regulating refrigerants:-a-sustainable route towards Green Deal objectives 09 March 2022 Restriction Process Coordinator FNS Ee echa.europa.eu/restriction-process REACH restriction Restriction is a tool for protecting our health and the environment from the risks posed by chemicals Address a risk that is not adequately controlled Where action is required at Union level Safety net for other REACH and EU processes Restrictions usually limit or ban manufacture, placing on the market or use of a substance (also in a mixture/article) A restriction can also set out specific conditions such as technical measures or labelling requirements Dossier submitter can be a Member State or ECHA Evaluated by ECHA's committees for risk and socio- economic analysis Decision making by COM with Member States Scrutiny by Council of the EU and European Parliament 2 echa.europa.eu/restriction-process Restriction process ( ) ( ) ( ) 3 Starting the process If Member States, Commission or ECHA have a concern that a substance poses a risk to our health or the environment, preparatory work starts to investigate the problem through risk management option analysis (RMOA) If they conclude that a restriction is the best way forward a notification is made Registry of intentions 12 months prior to submission Enables interested parties (citizens, organisations, companies and authorities) to plan for how they will contribute the restriction process echa.europa.eu/registry-of-restriction-intentions 4 Restriction proposal Annex XV report Annex XV report should contain: Information on hazards, exposures and risk Justification for action at EU-wide level Available information on alternatives Proposal has to show that a restriction is the most appropriate risk management measure to address identified risk Multiple restriction options can be assessed Proposal would typically also include socio-economic impact analysis 5 Evaluation (~12 months) After submission by ECHA Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) Socio-Economic Analysis Committee (SEAC) opinions Effectiveness, practicality and monitorability of the proposed restriction(s) An appropriate restriction must be: Targeted to effects or exposures resulting in the risk Capable of reducing these risks within a reasonable time period proportionate to the risk Socio-economic analysis Net benefits to society (human heath and environment) Net costs to society (manufacturers, importers, consumers) 6 Consultations and stakeholder input Proposed restrictions subject to a 6 month consultation Draft SEAC opinion consultation for 60 days RAC-related information Annex XV will use best available information Could be `default' values or reasonable assumptions Stakeholders could have information to refine the risk assessment e.g.

Ref.

Dear , Thank you for your kind invitation to speak at PFAS Updates Europe 2024.

Van: Verzonden: donderdag 30 november 2023 14:33 Aan: CC: Onderwerp: Re: Question on belgium's position on the recent Commission's proposal updating WFD, EQSD and GWD Dear I received your email concerning the 'Integrated Water Management' file concerning the revision of the WFD, GWD and EQSD.

- Ref.

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: (GROW) @cefic.be (GROW); (GROW); RE: FPP4EU - A request to work with you on PFAS mercredi 7 juillet 2021 14:09:04 image001.jpg (GROW) Dear DG GROW acknowledges the receipt of your email concerning the formation of a sector group of CEFIC called Fluorinated Products and PFAS for Europe (FPP4EU) with the aim to work with the stakeholders in Europe to address PFAS future restriction issues.

Regulation on fluorinated refrigerants for high-temperature heat-pumps: reasons for a time-limited derogation to ensure a smooth energy transition Paul-M.