Abex also objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that the information or materials it purports to seek otherwise lack relevance to the issues arising m these cases and are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Abex also objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that the information or materials it /* purports to seek otherwise lack relevance to the issues arising in these cases and are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Considering that 1.25 x 10^ tons of lead are emitted in total from automobiles then the following factor is used.

TpY From Cyclone Dryer #11 Stack test (#/hr) = From Vinyl Silos Stack test (#/hr) = From Cmpd Silos Stack test (#/hr) = (Based on 7/98 Stack testing) 6.3 = [. 27.8 TPY (Based on 7/98 Stack testing) 0.61 = p . 2.7jTPY (Based on 7/98 Stack testing) 0.90 =r 3s\jpy Total =P 108.1 ~~]tPY * Total HAP's (Non-VOC) PA Calculation Total PA Emissions= Lead Calculation Total Lead Emissions = HCl Calculation Total HCl Emissions = Chlorine Calculation Total Chlorine Emissions = ABDOO144768 0.2 TPY 0.004 TPY 0.4 TPY 2.1 TPY Total HAP's (Non-VOC) Emitted = ; V 2.8; ;TPY

Considering that 1.25 x 10 tons of lead ?

Replacement of tetra-ethyl lead with tetramethyl lead has no discernible effect on parti culate emissions.

ng that 1.25 x 105 tons of lead are emitted in total from automobiles then the following factor is'used.

In 2021, she returned to New Orleans to lead the Gulf of America through a transformative phase focused on lowcarbon, competitive energy production.

However, there has been a considerable amount of study done on the diffusion of other materials from automobiles, particularly lead and carbon monoxide.

Abex also objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that the information or materials it purports to seek otherwise lack relevance to the issues arising m these cases and are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

J- CARLISLE DEHAY, JR, (1 922 19911 GARY D.

Defendant further objects to the definition of these terms as calling for the production of material or information which is not relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Any interrogatory, request for admission or production utilizing this term is necessarily overly broad, over burdensome and calls for information which is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Defendant further objects to the definition of these terms as calling for the production of material or information which is not relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Defendant further objects to the definition of these terms as calling for the production of material or information which is not relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.