Dana Corporation Page 21 of 176 Table of Contents Item 2 --Properties As shown in the following table, at December 31, 2003, our continuing operations had 251 manufacturing, distribution and service branch or office facilities worldwide.
refid# 71ZBbKp41wJ85BOR9ErqE0axV1 page
Dana Corporation Page 135 of 176 Table of Contents we were a member of the CCR, we believe that our litigation strategy has reduced and will continue to reduce our indemnity costs.
refid# 2qpo5B2z90RGxyQGxmM35owvR1 page
Dana Corporation Page 154 of 176 Table of Contents including the cost of relocating people, transferring equipment and maintaining buildings held for sale.
refid# O1OR6mnkeNndqzRwyMa5jjZz11 page
Page 1 1 CAUSE NO. 03CV0588 2 LOUISE ALTIMORE * IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF 3 VS. 4 * * GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS * QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC., ET AL. * 405THJUDICIALDISTRICT 5 6 7 8 9 10 ORAL DEPOSITION OF 11 BRUCE LARSON 12 MARCH 23, 2004 13 14 15 16 THE ORAL DEPOSITION OF BRUCE LARSON, duly sworn, produced as 17 a witness at the instance of the PLAINTIFF LOUISE ALTIMORE, 18 was taken in the above styled and numbered cause on the 23rd 19 of March, 2004, from 10:56 a.m. to 1:32 p.m., before Suzi 20 Gladney, CSR, RPR, Certified Shorthand Reporter in and for 21 the State of Texas, reported by machine shorthand, at the 22 offices of Abrams, Scott & Bickley, LLP, 700 Louisiana, 23 Suite 1800, Houston, Texas, pursuant to the Texas Rules of 24 Civil Procedure and the provisions stated on the record. 25 Word For Word Reporting (713) 847-8984 EXX-MOR-004691 1 APPEARANCES 2 3 FOR THE PLAINTIFF LOUISE ALTIMORE: Mr.
refid# X3vGj6e6mN3NqXrz4606KOZd121 pages
BRUCE LARSON 12/18/06 Page 1 1 CAUSE NO. 2005-52097 2 BILLIE ONEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 3 HEIRS AND ESTATE OF FLOYD ONEY; VICKI NEW, 4 INDIVIDUALLY; AND JANET SVRCEK, INDIVIDUALLY, 5 PLAINTIFFS 6 VS . 7 8 ALCOA, INC., ET AL, 9 DEFENDANTS ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS ) ) ) ) ) 11TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 10 TRANSFERRED FROM 11 CAUSE NO. 05-CV-147 12 FLOYD ONEY AND ) IN THE COUNTY COURT 13 BILLIE ONEY, ) 14 PLAINTIFFS ) ) 15 VS . ) ) AT LAW NO. 1 OF 16 ABLE SUPPLY CO., ET AL, 17 DEFENDANTS ) ) ) ) ) CALHOUN COUNTY, TEXAS 18 19 k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k -k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k-k'k 20 ORAL DEPOSITION OF BRUCE ALLEN LARSON 21 VOLUME 1 OF 1 22 DECEMBER 18, 2006 23 -k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k'k-k'k 24 25 ORAL DEPOSITION OF BRUCE ALLEN LARSON, produced as a WWW.LEGALPARTNERS.COM 713-935-1611 EXX-MOR-005065 BRUCE LARSON 12/18/06 Page 2 1 witness duly sworn by me at the instance of the Plaintiffs, 2 Billie Oney, Individually and as Representative of the Heirs 3 and Estate of Floyd Oney; Vicki New, Individually; and Janet 4 Svrcek, Individually, taken in the above styled and numbered 5 cause on the 18th day of December, 2006, from 9:43 a.m. to 4:57 6 p.m., before Misty Fondren Clements, Certified Shorthand 7 Reporter in and for the State of Texas, at the Law Offices of 8 DeHay & Elliston, 36 South Charles Street, Suite 1300, 9 Baltimore, Maryland 21201, pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil 10 Procedure (and the provisions stated on the record or attached 11 herein). 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WWW.LEGALPARTNERS.COM 713-935-1611 EXX-MOR-005066 BRUCE LARSON 12/18/06 Page 3 1 APPEARANCES 2 3 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: 4 Mr.
refid# 4Q69GMkJ5mwwRMDYxLmOja0Lj338 pages
134 A-C MULTISPEED-MAGNETIC LjO 3 Phase-Reduced Voltage-Primary Resistor-Non Reversing Starters LU 3 Oft i WHEN ORDERING SPECIFY Catalog number Voltage and frequency ; Heater coils, select by full load current for each speed.
refid# rx5YGeOoNp4VQn6X0oKELpbKE1 page
628 CHAPTER 23 195?
refid# emJq8GkJ83aZm7ebqO7ooBK2M1 page
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COHSKT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ^ to* GALVESTON DIVISION KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC, THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC., AND THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY cMt02 479 JURY NOTICE OF REMOVAL Union Carbide Corporation ("UCC"), one of the defendants, files this Notice of Removal of this civil action filed against it by plaintiff Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc. to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1441, et seq,, and on the basis ofthe following which show that this case is properly removable: 1.
refid# 2qrZKDynbk1Bdaze9V8wqgk2N7 pages
276 ____________________________________________ '___________ Heatint Systmu Pacific manufactures a complete line of steel boilers for heating homes, commercial aod industrial buildings.
refid# D25J8K8MoXqpYebpmbmRqZ1M1 page
Further, affiant sayeth not.
refid# b53ZVQeKqgb1Y9XKwEVR73a5y1 page
and 1500 Hz are now available on some in struments Clinical measurements of hearing are made to determine the presence of abnormal function of the ear Before behavior can be described as abnormal, a reference point, or normal value, must be designated The standard values of average normal threshold for pure tones are expressed in decibels of sound pressure level re 0 0002 dvne per square centimeter The quantity that is of interest, however, is not the sound pressure level of the normal threshold but rather the magnitude of departure from this threshold To simplify the calculation of these depar tures, audiometers are now calibrated to read "zero" when the sound pressure level of the output signal is equal to the sound pressure level of the reference standard Departures from reference can then be read directly from the setting of the audiometer attenuator dial Departures from reference threshold may be expressed as "x dB above audiometer zero" or simply as "x dB hearing level " In clinical records any change from reference threshold is expressed as "hearing level in decibels re audiometer zero " Pure tone audiometry may be subdivided into two classes threshold audiometry and screening audiometry Each may be done by manual or automatic equipment Threshold audiometry Threshold audi ometry, as its name implies, is used to de termine the auditory threshold for a given stimulus There are three sources of varia bility which may affect the results of pure tone threshold tests, namely, variability in the test environment, m the subject's per formance and in the tester's performance Variability in the test environment is caused mainly by changing ambient noise levels m the testing area Unless test areas are specially treated to reduce ambient noise levels below certain specified values, the measured thresholds of persons with normal hearing may be masked The usual ambient noises in test environments are predominantly low frequency sounds, and most of the mask ing at 1000 Hz and below It is usually easy to detect masked low frequency thresholds on audiograms made m poorly sound-treated environments These audiograms show normal or near normal hearing at 1000 Hz and hearing losses as large as 10 dB at 250 Hz and at 500 Hz Thresholds at 1000 Hz may show the effect of masking if the ambient levels are moderately high Unless hearing tests are made under extremely bad condi tions there is very little, if any, masking effect seen at 2000 Hz and higher frequencies Ambient noise m the testing environment is perhaps the most frequent environmental cause of variations in audiograms, but it is by no means the only cause The subject must be comfortable so that he will not be come restless and squirm or fidget Humidity, temperature, barometric pressure, and the size and decor of the test room are all factors that influence comfort and it is important to pay attention to these details in order to pro vide optimum conditions for producing good audiograms Variability caused directly by the subject may be caused by his past experience with hearing tests, to intelligence, education, and physiological conditions, or to his hearing and attitude towards the test In this latter category for example, subjective tinnitus (a purely subjective sensation of noise, such as ringing in the ears) is sometimes loud enough to mask the signal tone and produce spunous records The attitude of the subject toward the test is of extreme importance Variability caused by the tester is de pendent to a large extent upon his motivation A tester may be extremely well trained, but if he is careless, the test results may be com pletely invalid A minimum amount of train ing in giving hearing tests is absolutely es sential, especially actual practice training with an audiometer Careful testing is im portant also Screening audiometry Screening audi ometry has only limited use m industry It can be used successfully for follow-up audi ometry since only a change in heanng status is sought Usually screening is accomplished by testing at several frequencies with a level of 15-20 dB The subject is passed if he hears the tone and failed if not Those who fail are retested with threshold audiometry Automatic audiometry.
refid# 2RV0moooMRXjmQd00MgQZxao61 page
IN RE: BALTIMORE CITY * IN THE ASBESTOS LITIGATION * CIRCUIT COURT * FOR BALTIMORE CITY * Consolidated No. 24X000003 81 Jfc sfic * * sj CHARLES CARGILE, et al.
refid# jBVZO7Z9MLYBYXzY4220VqoZp59 pages
NOV-06-2002 WED 04:28 PM SHEPARD HOFFMAN ESQ FAX NO. 2145220420 P. 23 .
refid# LJz7DERo9jD1o1rZvO487r9rb1 page
EDITORIAL i --by MmtI F.
refid# 7Onjak5X4Z0KwNM26mXZq32Jo2 pages
FEB-02-2005 08' 35 SftE CUSTOMER SALES 724 776 0002 P.04 2 OBSERVATIONS OF LINING WEAR The near absence of free asbestos fiber from lining wear has been reported by Luxon (S) using x-ray diffraction and by Lynch (4) using the TEM.
refid# q3Yj7p0d4Z32pyLarJn4k3jDR1 page