CXR Biosciences Ltd.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 3 MARSHALL DIVISION 4 5 CHARLES WILSON AND ) 6 LAURA WILSON, ) 7 Plaintiffs, ) 8 vs. ) Civil Action No. 9 RYCOLINE PRODUCTS, ) 2:06-CV-286 10 INC., et al., ) 11 Defendant. ) 12 * * * * * 13 14 15 16 The video deposition of JOHN SPENCER was 17 taken on Wednesday, September 12, 2007, commencing 18 at 9:37 a.m., at the Hilton Hotel BWI, 1739 West 19 Nursery Road, Room 1115, Linthicum Heights, 20 Maryland, before Timothy R.

The dam apparently had problems in delivering its litter, resulting in the fetuses dying in utero, leading to its adverse clinical condition.

The following personnel from Exygen Research were associated with various phases of this interim portion o f the study: Name John Flaherty Karen Risha Paul Connolly Christine Edwards Mark Ammerman Amy Sheehan Mark Neeley James Miller Brittany Kravets Mindy Cressley Kimberly Hall Frances Crespi Krista Gallant Ed Cams Title Vice President Scientist Technical Lead-LC/MS Technician Sample Custodian Associate Scientist Scientist Scientist Technician Technician Technician Technician Technician Sample Custodian Exygen Research Page 6 o f 115 Interim Report #4 - Analysis o f Surface Soil Samples Exygen Study No.: P0001131 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PA G E................................................................................................................................. 1 GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE COMPLIANCE STATEM ENT................................ 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEM ENT................................................................................ 3 CERTIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY................................................................................. 4 STUDY IDENTIFICATION........................................................................................................ 5 PROJECT PERSONNEL............................................................................................................. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................. 7 LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................ 8 LIST OF FIGURES....................................................................................................................... 9 LIST OF APPENDICES.............................................................................................................10 1.0 SUM MARY..........................................................................................................................11 2.0 OBJECTIVE.........................................................................................................................11 3.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................ 11 4.0 ANALYTICAL TEST SAMPLES.....................................................................................12 5.0 REFERENCE M ATERIAL................................................................................................13 6.0 DESCRIPTION OF ANALYTICAL METHOD.............................................................14 6.1.

The following personnel from Exygen Research were associated with various phases of this interim portion of the study : Name Title John Flaherty Vice President Karen Risha Scientist Paul Connolly Technical Lead-LC/MS Christine Edwards Technician Mark Ammerman Sample Custodia n Amy Sheehan Associate Scientist Brittany Kravets Technician Scott Crain Technician Frances Crespi Technician Devon Ingram Technician Christa Gallant Technician Exygen Research Page 6 of 110 p. 7 Interim Report #23 - Analysis of Sediment Samples Exygen Study No . : P0000760 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PAGE . ... .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . .1 GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE COMPLIANC .E STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ..2 QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..3 CERTIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 STUDY IDENTIFICATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 PROJECT PERSONNEL. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 7 LIST OF TABLES . .--- . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .8 LIST OF FIGURES . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .9 LIST OF APPENDICES . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .10 1 .0 SUMMARY . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .11 2 .0 OBJECTIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .11 3 .0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 4 .0 ANALYTICAL TEST SA .IVIPLES. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-12 5 .0 REFERENCE MATERIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 6 .0 DESCRIPTION OF ANALYTICAL METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 3 6 .1 Extraction Procedure For Sediment . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 6 .2 Direct Inject Extraction Procedure For Sediment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 6 .3 Additional SPE Extraction Procedure For Sediment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .14 6 .4 Percent Solids Procedure For Sediment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 6 .5 P reparation of Standards and Fortification Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 6.6 Chromatography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 6 .7 Instrument Sensitivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SERGB. 00*005 67S PcWEPS S.

The dam apparently had problems in delivering its litter, resulting in the fetuses dying in utero, leading to its adverse clinical condition.

The following personnel from Exygen Research were associated with various phases of this interim portion of the study: Name John Flaherty Karen Risha Paul Connolly Chrissy Edwards Mark Ammerman Amy Sheehan Eric Edwards Brittany Kravets Title Vice President Scientist Technical Lead-LC/MS Technician Sample Custodian Associate Scientist Sample Custodian Technician Exygen Research Page 6 of 105 Interim Report #3-Analysis o f Ground Water Samples Exygen Study No.: P0001131 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TITLE PAGE.......................................................................................................................1 GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT............................. 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT......................................................................... 3 CERTIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY.......................................................................... 4 STUDY IDENTIFICATION............................................................................................... 5 PROJECT PERSONNEL.................................................................................................... 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF TABI.ES.............................................................................................................. 8 LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................. 9 LIST OF APPENDICES....................................................................................................10 1.0 SUMMARY................................................................................................................11 2.0 OBJECTIVE...............................................................................................................11 3.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................11 4.0 ANALYTICAL TEST SAMPLES..............................................................................12 5.0 REFERENCE MATERIAL........................................................................................12 6.0 DESCRIPTION OF ANALYTICAL METHOD........................................................13 6.1.

., may be taken before Deborah 7 Salers Garrett, CSR, RPR, as commissioner and Page 2 HARTOLDMON0032234 ABERNATHY 09-11-2001 Williams, Richard S. 8 Notary Public, Alabama at Large, at 9 Birmingham, Alabama, on September 11, 2001, at 10 1:00 p.m. 11 12 IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that it 13 shall not be necessary for any objections to 14 be made by counsel to any questions except as 15 to form or leading questions and that counsel 16 may make objections and assign grounds at the 17 time of trial or at the time said deposition 18 is offered in evidence or prior thereto. 19 20 IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that notice 21 of filing by the Commissioner is waived. 22 23 REGIONAL REPORTING SERVICE, INC. 4 1 BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 2 3 RICHARD S.

GLP10-01-02; Interim Report 18 Analysis o f PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in W ater Samples F S IA -J u n e 2011 GLP10-01-02: Interim Report 18 - Analysis of PFBS.

Final Interim Report Reviw 11/03/06 11/06/06 11/06/06 11/06/06 Lydia Shaffer Technical Lead, Quality Assurance Unit Date 'Note: All in-lab inspections will be documented in the QA statement for the final analytical report at the conclusion of the study.

SEROfi.DO*00567b PCWEfSS.1 C.CST.LLt.

CXR Biosciences Ltd.

INTERIM REPORT #29 - Reanalvsis of Soil and Sludge Samples STUDY TITLE Analysis of Perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS), Perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHS), and Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in Water, Soil, Sediment, Fish, Clams, Vegetation, Small Mammal Liver and Small Mammal Serum Using LC/MS/MS for the 3M Decatur Monitoring Program DATA REQUIREMENTS EPA TSCA Good Laboratory Practice Standards 40 CFR 792 STUDY DIRECTOR Jaisimha Kesari P.E., DEE Weston Solutions, Inc. 1400 Weston Way West Chester, PA 19380 Phone: 610-701-3761 INTERIM REPORT COMPLETION DATE August 27, 2007 PERFORMING LABORATORY MPI Research, Inc. 3058 Research Drive State College, PA 16801 Phone:814-272-1039 STUDY SPONSOR 3M Company 3M Building 0236-01-B-10 St.

Final Interim Report Reviw 11/03/06 11/06/06 11/06/06 11/06/06 Lydia Shaffer Technical Lead, Quality Assurance Unit Date 'Note: All in-lab inspections will be documented in the QA statement for the final analytical report at the conclusion of the study.