ANSWER: See Preliminary Statement and General Objections, which are incorporated herein as if fully rewritten.

CENTRAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT cc: S.

'5 PV 1-81 eSfAiL'Swtr'Sc: E.

SAFETY AND FIRE PROTECTION SURVEY REPORT NO. 113 BEAUMONT WORKS PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT DUP-2021 Field Observations TEL November 3-4, 1981 G.

<SlTPPFE> E.

AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY * REPORT OF INVESTIGATION Quin-T Corporation Tilton, New Hampshire By Leon D.

CEROCK Wire & Cable Group, Inc. 285 NtCOLL STREET, P.0.

CEROCK Wire & Cable Group, Inc.

CHUPUND 0 uunMiMi E.'

MDP 60________ EXHIBIT# Chajnbers Work3 Mechanical Department Sheet 6 of 16 CATE .ftif rini iTj,:1,;

AM IMMOVATIVK APPROACH TO ASBESTOS REMOVAL by Edward J.

^llfrii.i^"1IIBIi PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT -i DUP-2193 TEXTILE FIBER PLANT X-RAY STUDY SUMMERY SSAJORC PLANT, DELAWARE TOTALS t POSITIVE--............... 19 TECHNICALLY POOR FILMS.............. ....................... -- 11 NEGATIVE--------------------- --27 NUMBER OF CASES-------------- 57 WAYNESBORO PLANT, VIRGINIA TOTALS: POSITIVE-----------------------------------------4 TECHNICALLY POOR FILMS--------------- 17 NEGATIVE-------------------------------------- 21 NUMBER OF CASES----------------------------------- 42 NOTE: WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A FEW RECENT 1980 FILMS, THE OVERALL TECHNICAL QUALITY IS POOR.

In re.

In re: All Asbestos Litigation Filed by Simmons Cooper, Circuit Court, Third Judicial District, Madison Cty., IL; 11/17/05.

Federal Register / Vol. 51.