* Don'; eat or store feed, drtnks or smoking maanais in the vicmty of asbestos cr asbestoscontaining mater-aL Wash hands, kce and Screams before eating, drinking or smoking afar 'jerking with asbestos produces.

AT&T SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND SAFETY CONFERENCE September 11-12, 1985 AT&T Bell Laboratories 600 Mountain Avenue Murray Hill, NJ 07974 Rooms 6B-201, 6B-230 Hosted By: AT&T Bell Laboratories Industrial Hygiene and Safety Department/Environraental Health, Environmental Manage ment, and Safety Center TENTATIVE AGENDA Day 1 8:00- 8:15 Arrival/Coffee 8:15- 8:30 Welcome/Opening Remarks 8:30- 9:00 Toxicity of Semiconductor Gases 9:00- 9:30 Safe Handling of Hazardous Gases 9:30-10:00 Cylinder Leak Detection Methods/Denonstration Hj Pipeline Upgrade 10:00-10:15 Break 10:15-11:15 Current Engineering Aspects and Demonstration - Double Walled Piping - Toxic Gas Cabinets/Monitors/Valves 11:15-11:45 RD Hazard Communication Program 11:45-12:45 Lunch 12:45-2:55 Tours 1, 2, 3 (7-8 people per group) G.

PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT ATT-399 Bell Laboratories 600 Mountain Avenue Murrey Hill, New Jersey 07974 Phone (201) 562-0000 March 27, 1980 Mr.

LAW OfflCCS Kilpatrick & Cody surre moo *SOt m STRCCT* N.W.

f t August 14, 1985 Bigelow-Liptak Corporation 1250 Maplelawn Drive Troy, Michigan 48007 Gentlemen: I hereby tender my resignation as a Director of Bigelow-Liptak Corporation to be effective August 31, 1985.

mcDonouen GROUP PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT BOND-248 MCDONOUGH CAPERTON/CLEVELAND Suite 106 3733 Park East, Cleveland, Ohio 44122 (216) 464-6920 January 23, 1981 Jack Randall, Inc.

A-.tC trt^-Kitries Conway Memorandum Date: November 21, 1980 Subject: DELCO MORAINE REF: ADI-HB TELEX 11/20/80 From: A.D.

Form F-I*o (V7) c BrownG^RooUnc.

Name of Installation: EPA I.0.

22618 Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 119 / Friday, |une 20, 1986 / Rules and Regulations fluctuations caused by the small size of risk.

relating to asbestos-containing automotive friction products manufactured by Abex. 38.

waste disposal procedures at the Orzinuovi plant conflicted with provisions of the LRL as of its entry into force and all times thereafter See Pis' Ex U, Amendola Rpt, p 13 In making his argument, the Professor cobbles together a compendium of duties for waste producers by selectively picking provisions ofthe LRL and charges that the Orzinuovi plant operator did not adequately meet these obligations See id at 13-14 He summarizes the obligations as follows "whomever had disposed in the past of industrial waste by dumping it (or burying it), was under a duty to notify the Region and to indicate the location of the closed dumps If the person disposing of the waste was managing a waste disposal facility, it was obliged to apply for authorization to continue its activity, subject to the use of appropriate facilities and the adoption of all necessary precautions " Id at 14 His report then lists various reasons why Frendo's actions failed to properly comply with the LRL See id at 15-18 The fatal flaw in the Professor's argument, however, is that on April 30, 1984, regulatory authorities formally recognized the cessation of landfill usage at the Orzinuovi plant and Frendo's compliance with the LRL As discussed earlier, on October 1, 1980, regional officials received formal notification, pursuant to the LRL, from Frendo regarding waste disposal activities at the plant After an April 19, 1984 on-site inspection of the plant, on April 30, 1984, the Province issued a decree verifying compliance with the LRL regulatory scheme *20 Hobbled by this (/ e, the official confirmation of compliance with the LRL as of April 30, 1984), Professor Amendola (and Plaintiffs' environmental expert, Mr Marcoaldi) challenges that edict by nit-picking the notification approach taken by Frendo and by charging that Frendo failed to disclose all ofthe landfills m the notification reports filed in accordance with the LRL The fact remains that the Italian regulators charged with enforcement ofthe LRL had the opportumty-and availed themselves of it--to explore the bases for and quality of Frendo's reporting with respect to waste disposal activities at the plant by conducting an on-site inspection This Court therefore refuses to belatedly second-guess the determinations of a foreign agency exercising its regulatory function Accordingly, the Court finds that Frendo was m full compliance with the LRL as of April 30,1984, the date on which the Region issued *ts offica!

to Abex's purchase of S.K.

^ttnsD Automotive Bendix Friction Materials Division P.0 Box 238 Troy.

^tUED Automotive Memorandum Bendlx Friction Materials Division Troy, New York Date: July 31, 1986 i - To: R.