This package was: Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Petition Friction Materials Standards Institute Comments Asbestos Information Association Comments The foregoing is sent as a matter of information, and the Institute would welcome comments and suggestions as to a possible position.
refid# xj4RXBDYo7bn3dr0qwvJM01ZG4 pages
Trosper, Third Annual Industry-Government Conference, Asbestos Information Association North America, Washington, DC, 109115 OSHA 14.
refid# RaQpqEnVq1zqweZQVJ7ZwX4GB3 pages
waste asbestos.
refid# RjYJjV8GJMErYj5bzyYEg09r73 pages
probably will cost about $2 billion Bob Pigg, executive director of to remedy asbestos problems in the Asbestos Information Associ schools across the country and will ation, an industry trade group be paid for primarily by local composed of asbestos miners, districts.
refid# 4qQbx4w7JGQpvopqgQ20Z9Jj2 pages
Pigg Asbestos Information Association/ North America 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway Crystal Square 4, Suite 509 Arlington, Virginia 22202 Dear Bob: Attached is a report on an interesting development in California, i.e. rejection of the Cal-OSHA revised standard on cleanup of asbestos by the Office of Administrative Law.
refid# RJkrdKYOZBgpREaYQRnZ2qwQz2 pages
Said organizations, etcetera, include, at a minimum, the following: Asbestos Textile Institute (ATI); Industrial Hygiene Foundation and/or Industrial Health Foundation (IHF); Mineral Wool Institute; Industrial Mineral Insulation Manufacturers Institute, Magnesia Silica Insulation Manufacturers Association, National Insulation Manufacturers Association (NIMA); Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association (TIMA); Asbestos Information Association (AIA); Quebec Asbestos Mining Association (QAMA) ; National Safety Council, Asbestos Cement Producers Association; Refractories Institute.
refid# KG7K3O5Gj5xza04d1KoXx87gK3 pages
Williams - AB1410 4 - Subject Asbestos Standards Update There are two asbestos standards one for general industry 1910.19 and one for the construction industry 1926.58 We will be covered by both standards According to OSHA our production use of asbestos and asbestos under the General Industry Standard 1910.19 containing products will fall Our maintenance type jobs asbestos removal and repair will fall under the Construction Standard 1926.58 There are similarities between the two and also differences as you would expect Both standards have areas that will be difficult to comply with but the Construction Standard is by far the more difficult of the two 01-480505-04 2402 1023688 01 The present status of these standards is that they are being challenged in the court by the CIO and by the Asbestos Information Association Testimony is presently being heard It is uncertain at this point whether the standard will be upheld or remanded back to OSHA for modification If the standard is upheld the startup dates are as follows ' 1926.58 - June 20 1986 + 210 days e 1910.19 - Various dates from October 17 1986 to July 1988 for specifics see standard On all OSHA standards the Washington office sends out a directive to the area offices stating how the standard is to be enforced They also offer training courses for their inspectors Thus far neither activity has taken place We will be getting a copy of this directive which will enable us to better advise you on this very difficult standard The Organizational Resources Council ORG an industry lobby group to which Caterpillar belongs is preparing a list of questions on these standards to be presented to the Washington D.C.
refid# emMG418pazDjwMXQ4DMZLbQNm4 pages
Pigg, President (The following statement was issued today by the Asbestos Information Association/North America (AIA/NA).
refid# O12M1B7GYObmyoN3qOpOwoO2v5 pages
You should know that, coincidently to learning of OSHA's intended action described above, the Asbestos Information Association/North America (AIA/NA) which represents producers and users of asbestos in North America submitted to OSHA on April 7, 1983 a recommended standard for occupational asbestos exposure in construction.
refid# 0qdLx2NgxzbRzLkRn3QbwVBVk3 pages
Spraying Ban Not Supported By Evidence Washington, D.C. attorney Tim Hardy, who represented the Asbestos Information Association, said his client is dis appointed that the court upheld the technologically feasible finding, but is pleased with several other parts of the decision.
refid# BRpKkO1NO0xgby35k5Y1vJvNJ1 page
FILE NAME: Asbestos Cement Pipe and Sheet (ACPS) DATE: 1986 Jan 27 DOC#: ACPS117 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: AIA Memo to Members RE Supplementary Comments & Info on EPA Proposed Ban 7 '. - ^ ^ i t it lt iil^ t i s ASBESTOS INFORMATION ASSOCIATION M)RMAM>CA 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway.
refid# zQQKgL9Me6KqDV4LX4pdEdXM73 pages
The Directors agreed that the Institute and its Committee should work with the Asbestos Information Association as regards Office of Toxic Substances requests for information on voluntary training and labelling programs.
refid# EddEKbXVR6k2evNOo1KJ6pJK44 pages
Asbestos information Association charged that NIOSH's recom mendation is based almost entirely on epidemiologic evidence from worker populations exposed to asbestos at levels many times greater than those experienced in industry today.
refid# 2jz5bGK8yQ0dwoR783evzroer2 pages
The Directors agreed that the Institute and its Committee should work with the Asbestos Information Association as regards Office of Toxic Substances requests for information on voluntary training and labelling programs.
refid# RpMpL506nKR4V5dZwX6QmxzzE4 pages
FILE NAME: Asbestos Information Association (AIA) DATE: 1986 Sept DOC#: AIA025 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: MeetingAttendance List INDUSTRY-GOVERNMENT CONFERENCE September 15-16, 1986 ATTENDANCE LIST Wendell B.
refid# X7y6qVw7JkRr52D03k02NJ67R4 pages