O YES NO Z25S LEAD YARD ORDER NO.

Confinement may lead to a detonation. ..w, sm ......

Realizing that the future promised a rapid increase of interest in industrial medicine, he centered the efforts of his administration on promotion of a program that would lead the way to such development rather than follow in its wake.

l^tgJ_ZgolAtabial__ I 0thte OJfNo-J _ leading Siainee^ng. __________________ i Atlanta Snginearing, mi,,, ii ii sossasss* Columbia Engineering. _______ DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE 472501 AreartMBg Cootetetlsc 4 Sepply Coiymto Inwaurttnv Ndhj^ItcsIa Bsb *Wt Locctl (Ml/ PlKit), C*tal3, S, C. ?

E & MJ Metal & Mineral Markets 2Z> #1^, 11 (Apr. 20,1961) ~ "^The tremendous growth in technical specifica tions and complex asbestos fibre grading has lead to the establishment of an Asbestos Fibre Standards Laboratory, to be operated ,I ASARCO ALV 0001338 ~4' jointly by the University of Sherbrooke, Quebec, and the Quebec Asbestos Mining Assn.

The common uses of commercial PCB would not normally lead to its release into the natural environment.

Meyer, ns President, stated that he faoed the eeslnt year vlth confidence and enthusiasm, that the ooupany was p 'eying a leading roll In the ohanging building materials construct.on eoonoery and that 1962 should add significantly to Its further growth.

INTERROGATORY NO. 10: Please identify the person(s) with the most knowledge concerning the corporate defendant knowledge, policies and/or procedures involving actual or potential hazards associated with asbestos-containing materials at any corporate location or plant in: (a) 1965 (b) 1975 (c) 1985 (d) 1995 ANSWER: The defendant objects to Interrogatory Number 10 on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome, and seeks the discovery of information that is not reasonably PPAB-CH1/355048.1 3 calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant, admissible evidence.

Miller January 24, 1969 Page Three accepted by FDA as well as industry, will provide a new toxicological base for present and future consideration which could lead to improvements in the present regulatory situation, i.e. by at least making it possible for FDA to set some levels of addition where it can be said that Food Additive Petitions will not be required for clearance of relatively minor packaging materials components.

Tiffany, Jill and David John, all of whom have sustained pecuniary damages from the death of Lisa Patton 4 This action has been commenced within two years after the death of Lisa Patton 5 Plaintiff Cynthia Patton was employed by and worked at defendant Hooker, Ruco Division, located in Burlington, New Jersey, from on or about December 17, 1979 until on or about November 17, 1980 Mrs Patton became pregnant in March, 1980, OCC 015885 and continued working for defendant Hooker until three weeks before her baby was due 6 Plaintiff Cynthia Patton was exposed during the time she worked for defendant Hooker and during the time she was pregnant to a number of chemicals present at the Hooker facil ity, including without limitation chromium, lead chromate, arsenic, PVC, vinyl chloride (monomers), IIP (rubber resins), benzene, cadmium and resins (nitro-oxide) 7 Plaintiff Cynthia Patton gave birth on December 5, 1980 to a severely deformed baby girl, Lisa Patton, who was diagnosed as having spina bifida, club feet, and severe respira tory problems 8 Lisa Patton survived only seven months, and died m July, 1981 9 Prior the the birth of Lisa Patton, plaintiff Cynthia Patton had given birth to two healthy, normal children Subse quent to Lisa Patton's death, plaintiff Cynthia Patton gave birth in the spring of 1982 to a healthy, normal child 10 The aforesaid deformity and illness of Lisa Patton was caused by the exposure of plaintiff Cynthia Patton during her pregnancy while she was employed by defendant Hooker to the chemicals present at the defendant's facility located in Burlington, New Jersey, m that defendant Hooker negligently and wrongfully failed to provide a safe working environment and neg ligently and wrongfully failed to warn of the dangers of expo- OCC 015886 -i -4- sure to the various chemicals present, and was otherwise negli gent 11 As a result of the aforesaid exposure, Lisa Patton suffered severe injuries resulting m her death, which caused pecuniary injury to her heirs-at-law WHEREFORE, plaintiffs Carl R Patton and Cynthia L Patton, as Administrators ad Prosequendum for the heirs-at-law of Lisa Gail Patton, demand judgment against defendant for damages, interest, and costs of suit SECOND COUNT 1 Plaintiffs repeat the allegations of the First Count herein 2 As a result of the aforesaid deformity and illness, significant hospital, medical and funeral expenses were incurred on behalf of Lisa Patton WHEREFORE, plaintiffs Carl Patton and Cynthia Patton, as Administrators ad Prosequendum for the heirs-at-law of Lisa Patton, demand judgment against defendant for damages, interest, and costs of suit THIRD COUNT 1 Plaintiffs repeat the allegations of Paragraph 1 of the First Count herein 2 As a result of the aforesaid exposure, Lisa Patton suffered severe painful bodily deformities including, without OCC 015887 limitation, spina bifida, club feet and respiratory problems, and other serious injuries which caused her great pain and suf fering until her death WHEREFORE, plaintiffs Carl R Patton and Cynthia L Patton, as Administrators ad Prosequendum for Lisa Gail Patton, demand judgment against defendant for damages, interest, and costs of suit FIFTH COUNT 1 Plaintiffs repeat the allegations of the First Count herein 2 As a result of the aforesaid exposure, plaintiffs Cynthia L Patton and Carl R Patton suffered severe pain and emotional distress during the pregnancy of Cynthia Patton, and after the birth and during the life of Lisa Patton WHEREFORE, plaintiffs Carl R Patton and Cynthia L Patton, individually, demand judgment against defendant for damages, interest and costs of suit SMITH, STRATTON, WISE, HEHER & BRENNAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated Robert A White OCC 015888 JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs demand trial by jury SMITH, STRATTON, WISE, HEHER & BRENNAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated November 1982 G^ Robert A White OCC 015889

Recovery Phase The use of a short period far recovering unreacted monomer from the poly mer might lead to more residual monomer In the reactor (e.g..

., National Lead Company Bay Refining Company (Div.

There is now good reason to believe that the compounds are involved, together with DDT compounds, in the thinning of shells of sea birds tod this alone has lead British scientists to press for a ban on the further manufacture of them.

GAF Corporation objects to this interrogatory on the ground that it is vague, overbroad and burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant information.

There is r ason to believe that the investigation into cotton textiles may lead Hader, or someone else, to the Asbestos Textile Industry.