12 The existence of a basic correlation between asbestos dust deposit as consequence of an occupationally contracted disease and the formation of primary protective cell tumors of the peritoneum resulting from a chronic, mechanical-inflamatory irritation of the peritoneum by asbestos fibres penetrating from the pleural cavity -- has been amply demonstrated by the histological structure of the matty-^papillose and the nodular forTmations seen in some portions of tumors, by ferrous pigment deposits, but particularly by x-ray findings of asbestos dust in tumor tissue.

16P FROM: TO:16182590896 164 OU$l DISEASES, EXCLUDING THE HBR0T1C PNUUMOCONlOSGS a impounds, at least, must be added to the list ot' substances which may cause cancer of the respiratory tract.

WPif 120-1 AIR CONDITIONING 110- 217 r-120 -no 100- -100 90- w -90 WET BULB TEMPERATURE < H 80.

'"'N / 1 :e r. .t r-y 53 161.

90 CHAPTER 4 extraordinary difficulties the labor problem presents us with, I hold the view that those 2-3 millions should be specially selected and preserved.

152 CHAPTER 5 prompted by drink may also have insulted the spartan sensibilities of the era.

290 NOTES TO PAGES 43-46 Health Office put on a play entitled Zu spat (Too late) featuring cancer preven tion propaganda; see Fritze and Morchutt, "Abschrift," July 13, 1937, E 1496, THW. 24.

Workioiisnhjid dr Boiriebnge tnoinicba1Uin FORD.

Page 3004 1 Was there ever any testing that was -- that 2 you are aware of that was done in the 1930s or the 3 1940s concerning grinding of brakes?

1 materials, we are not going to request that a strict Page 3775 2 liability count be submitted to the jury. 3 In reviewing the law, it appears to us that 4 the strict liability count only works if we can 5 establish that Ford had some possession, control over 6 ability to test, component control over, et cetera, 7 the brake linings. 8 The testimony in the case is that the trucks 9 were all from the 1930s and '40s, none of them would 10 have had the original brakes on them when they -- 11 well, not that they wouldn't have had, but it is up in 12 the air as to whether they would have had any of the 13 original brakes on them, so we are not requesting that 14 a strict liability instruction be submitted to the 15 jury on the issue of the brake lining materials. 16 The theories and the principles of law we 17 are going forward on relate to Ford being negligent in 18 failing to provide warnings about the hazards 19 encountered when you change and install brakes 20 regardless of whose they were, whether they be Ford's 21 or any of the other substitute brake lining

NEG.

ittiua mlCiUU *.MfOtfKX leOKtCCK 4UUAM MlTCMCUL A. lac.

Fikat Edition McGRAW-HILL BOOK COMPANY, Inc.

Thz Sa^lnac Labqkato&t k* tkx Study or TuMaucuiosa 11 THX SDWAftD u 09 tamseAU fCUKSAtm SaaakacUj^N.Y.

SUMMER .