AHHUAL STATEKEHTS OF THE KARTIH-SBHOUH COMPART August 31, 1939 COHSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET THE UAKTIN-SEROUR CO.

November 19, 19 4 Mr.

LIA09458 i 5 1 i * ) t n i u CODS AUTHORITY lDXriS3 Se York.

HASKINS a S ELLS C - ' z ZZ P L S w ' ; ACCOUNTANTS 22 E A S T 40" STBEET NEW YORK 'i ;a ie Lead Industries association: Te :*avb :caae an examination oi the balance sheet of Lead Industries dissociation as oi sece..xr 31, hi, _nd of its state ment of income ana expenses for die year enuea that wtte .

Et h y l Ga s o l i n e Co r p o r a t io n JW ji 25 B roadway ^Ne w T o x k : January 21, 1936* tN REPLY PLEASE R EF E R T O E* W.

bl 'i v.

TH E ATLAN TIC R EFIN IN G CO M P AN Y PETROLEUM PRODUCTS '' 31-44 P A S S YCNK AVENUE - PIIILAI1KJL.PHIA., PA, H W.

C.

SKELLY OIL COMPANY INSURANCE DEPARTMENT C .

I sit!!

MAIN.

"4lr._ ; V if '' H ^ v - H$-* ** iw V*. a, ft* , -;J^ ^ : '^p ^ ?

September 15, 1938 Mr.

October 4, X 939 Dr* Carlos Otollna Log Lechosos a l^nte Brian 220 Caracas* D, F* Venezuela bear Doctor QtoXln&s I just received, word that leaded gasoline is to be blended in the near future in Venezuela by the Shell people at their San Lorenzo refinery, and by the Jersey people as well, Shis brings me to wish to complete the arrangements discussed with you by my associate* Dr.

August E* 1937 Dr* Carl M* H lllenbrand Plant Physician Harrison Radiator D ivision General Motors Corporation Lockport* Hew York Dear Doctor Hillenbrand* tI a a 3 e n d in ^ y oovu^hieerew ith reports on and The resu lt on^ B | i a within n o r m l^ fS x t^ ^ n fx o that on ^ ^ f l ^ f f o b a b l y not s i g n i f i c a n t l y h igh from cllrm ja3^ > oln t o f view but i s in d ic a t iv e o f some s lig h t lead exposure* or i t is at le a s t suggestive of such exposure* I am a ls o send in g you th com plete s e t of r e s u lt s on the blood samples and th e spot samples of u rin e which I obtained w hile at the plant* These are fo r your information aid for the sake of seeing the range o f valu es which i t is p o s s ib le to obtain in a group o f men who show no c lin ic a l evidences of In toxication * I have checked w ith a lead p en cil those re su lts which are s u ffic ie n tly h ig h to r a is e some q u estio n in one*s mind as to t h e ir s ig n ific a n c e * i f c l i n i c a l symptoms o f any kind were to d e v e^ i^ ^ a o w ey er , there i s only one* namely th at which is a sso cia ted with such sympTomB and p h y sic a l fin d in g s as might be in te r p r e te d as t o x ic symptoms due to lead* ' As I have in d ic a te d in a l e t t e r which I wrote Mr* Jen k ins a few days ago* I th in k a l l o f th e se symptoms and p h y sic a l s ig n s are b est explained otherwise* but the coincidence of such find in gs with a urinary value of 0*1?