FILE NAME: Allied Signal Bendix (ASB) DATE: 1974 A p r i l DOC#: ASB201 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Memo - Asbestos Position Paper . i April 11, 197** Bob Wiley f-..

FILE NAME: Mead (MEAD) DATE: 1971 Mar 10 DOC#: MEAD006 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Memo m o m m i) company ' ", A DIVISION' 'OF THE'KEAD CORPORATION .Woodward,, Alabama March 10, 1971 mmt Mr.

FILE NAME: Ford (FD) DATE: 1970 Nov 16 DOC#: FD106 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Memo - Asbestos Emissions from Brake Lining Wear hVr^V :/ `- V a**''*', v j * 1 C \ t f K Intro Company ENGINEERING ANI) ' ' MANUFACTURING STAFF loverno er 1, 157^ To: Mr.

FILE NAME: Ford (FD) DATE: 1972 Aug DOC#: FD159 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Memos RE Asbestos-Containing Materials with Attached List Inter Office Communication August 23, 1972 To: cc: Subject: Mr.

FILE NAME: Johnson & Johnson (JAJ) DATE: 1976 Mar 10 DOC#: JAJ 110 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: NYT Article - Asbestos Found In Ten Powders 1Z/30SD16 Asbestos Fim InTenPouters TheNaw York Times http://nyti.ms/1Pu9ygK A R C H IV E S I 1976 Asbestos Found In Ten Powders SPECIAL TO THE NEW YORK TIMES MARCH 10, 97$ Ten out o f 19 body and baby powders tested Mount Sinai Hospital here were contaminated with asbestos fibers capable of causing a rare form of chest and abdominal cancer, researchers have reported.

FILE NAME: Talc (TALC) DATE: 1972 Apr 19 DOC#: TALC063 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter to Barry Castleman from the FDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE PUBLIC HEALTH SER V ICE FOOD AND D RU G AD M IN ISTRATIO N W A S H IN G T O N , D C. 20Z04 April 19, 1972 Mr.

FILE NAME: JH DATE: 1978 Sept 20 DOC#: JH006 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: J-M Memo RE Licenses Agreement-Insurance Clause with Reference to Request by James Hardie and Co >41 Johns-Manville Internal Corresponderici To; R.

FILE NAME: Kaiser Gypsum (KG) DATE: 1974 Feb 11 DOC#: KG027 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Memo RE Safety Survey - Santa Ana Plant, Jan 23, 1974 <r KAISER C E M E N T 6- -3 Y F S U . .

FILE NAME: National Gypsum (NG) DATE: 1974 Dec 19 DOC#: NG051 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter from Gold Bond Building Products to J-M with Update on Asbestos Problem in MN GOLD BOND BUILDING PRODUCTS DIVISION OF N ATIO NAL GYPSUM COMPANY BUFFALO.

FILE NAME: Rogers Corporation (ROG) DATE: 1976 Mar 11 DOC#: ROG062 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter RE Use of Asbestos with Samples K j, ardi 1. 1976 Hr.

FILE NAME Allied Signal Bendix ASB DATE 1976 Dec 10 DOC ASB135 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Bendix Ballot RE FMSI Recommending Procedures for Reducing Asbestos Dust During Brake Servicing cared Friction Materials Standards 210 Route L aa Parsons New Jersey 07652 Institute Inc.

FILE NAME DuPont DUP DATE 1970 Sept 2 DOC DUP126 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Letter to Robert Gorson Thomas Jefferson Univ from James F.

FILE NAME Firestone FIRE DATE 1970 Jan 9 DOC FIRE019 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Letter from URW President Peter Bommarito to Firestone Dir Ind Relations J.V.

FILE NAME Manville JMA DATE 1972-1973 DOC JMA519 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Oil Company Asbestos Substitution > AL102691883 Division Headquarters January 22 1973 7.

FILE NAME Kelly Moore KM DATE 1977 Aug 22 DOC KM037 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Letter from Paco Textures Corp. to the Consumer Product Safety Commission RE Proposed Asbestos Ban ' ' |e - Textures Corporation Paco 1857 COMMERCIAL STREET CALIFORNIA 94070 = 415 582-8126 582-8126 SAN CARLOS August 22 1977 CSoencsruemtearryProduct Safety CommiCosmmisssioin on Washington D.C. 20207 RE PROPOSED RULES TO BAN ASBESTOS FROM PATCHING COMPOUNDS Dear Secretary letter is in regard to the proposed rules published This July 29 1977 in the Federal Register on states Patching compounds that are labeled The proposal sold solely for industrial use would not as marketed and of this ban However it is further be within the scope considers substantially all stated that the commission manufacturing wall We are a medium size company the rules would effect all Joint Compound As published even though it is almost Joint Compound business The commercial oefnto iu rr ely sold to the professional market of industry is already under the regulations O.S.E.A. small The retail or consumer portion of our business is but very identifiable not include material that If ban is required required it should In our use is made for commercial orprofessional between to distinquish distribution system it is very easy retail and the commercial sales But labeling USE the containing patching compound FOR COMMERCIAL ONLY and banning asbestos from containers under 20 pounds would further assure an effective control a zero level of asbestos in Technology has been appreaching reached the quality joint compounds However it has not yet market I have personally tested required by the commercial with little 236 different formula changes inatshb e els abtoorastoprryoducts of uccess I have also evaluated and found them also lacking in properties her manufacturers quired by the building industry The biggest problems being with shrinking and Lack of workability during application ven six months of further development I feel we could for the consumer who does not require a produce a product and who would normally use high production type product a product under more ideal climatic conditions MANUFACTURE OF JOINT CEMEN ' DRY WALL AND I 75 In summary I feel that the commission should clearly exclude the commercial professional market and that if a ban is determined to be required for the consumer market that it be effective 180 days after publication of the final rule I would also like to request a copy of the hearing held August 15 1977 at the commission hearing room with respect to the above matter Sincerely Douglas W.