FILE NAME: Newspaper & Magazine Articles (NMA) DATE: 1963 Feb 21 DOC#: NMA008 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: The Nashville Banner - Health Board to Review Asbestos Water Pipe Use -THE NASHVILLE WANNER, WJ,, Ffc. 21, 1963 !

FILE NAME: Eagle-Picher (EP) DATE: 1965 DOC#: EP017 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letters - * { .-4U-U p U^-C p (iOUkpi A p r il , 19^5 !

FILE NAME: Early Asbestos Damage Suits (EADS) DATE: 1961 DOC#: EADS004 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Documents from the Case of Fred Wenham UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT !

FILE NAME: Union Carbide (UC) DATE: 1969 Mar 25 DOC#: UC349 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter to Montello, Inc. from Calidria Asbestos RE Caution Label March 25, 1969 Mr.

FILE NAME: Texaco (TEX) DATE: 1967 June 14 DOC#: TEX035 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Newspaper Article - 'Asbestos Hazards' Protest < vfQfiliOl - imtimmrf t'M V t .

FILE NAME: Johnson & Johnson (JAJ) DATE: 1961 June 6 DOC#: JAJ036 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Letter to J&J from Battele Memorial Institute with Evaluation / t Battelle Memorial Institute SOS KINS A.

FILE NAME: Johnson & Johnson (JAJ) DATE: 1966 June DOC#: JAJ 130 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Journal Article - Massive Talc Aspiration *7^ C 653 Massive Talc Aspiration Successful Treatment With Dexamethasone WALTKK T.

FILE NAME: Sprayed Asbestos (SPRA) DATE: 1960 DOC#: SPRA014 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: UK Govt Regs - Statutory Instruments 1960, Part II STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1960 Part II LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS The headings FACTORIES to PURCHASE TAX INDEX TO PARTS I, II and III lPubltsbc by H utborttg LO N D O N : H E R M AJESTY'S STATIONERY O F FIC E Shipbuilding and Repairing 1427 1960 No. 1932 The Shipbuilding and Ship-repairing Regulations, 1960 Made - - ' - Laid before Parliament Coming into Operation 20th October, 1960 21th October, 1960 31sf March, 1961 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS Part I--Interpretation and General ........................................

FILE NAME: Oil Industry and American Petroleum Institute (API) DATE: 1965 July DOC#: API169 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: The Medical Bulletin - Table of Contents with Check Marks -y 156

FILE NAME: TILO (TIL) DATE: 1965-1967 DOC#: TIL013 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Newspaper Articles - TILO & Fires FOITETEEN THE BRIDGEPORT POIT.

FILE NAME Cape Asbestos CAPE DATE 1965 Apr 1 DOC CAPE109 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Charter Consolidated Ltd. - Preliminary Report and Approx Balance Sheet Legal - Tibbs Case Exhibit 7 ELECTRONICAL Y ELECTRONICALY 4 ELCTRONIAYFILED FILED - 2023 Oct 18 10:31 CHARTER CONSOLIDATED LIMITED AM - RIC-HLAND COMN PLEAS PLEAS BUSINESS STUDIES t - 203CP41759 Preliminary Report and Approximate Consolidated Balance Sheet at 1st April 1965 CHARTER CONSOLIDATED LIMITED Incorporated in England OFFICES REGISTERED 40 Holborn Viaduct London E.C.1 OFFICE Rolls Building 7 Fetter Lane London E.C.4 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA 44 Main Street Johannesburg RHODESIA 70 Jameson Avenue Central Salisbury C.4 ELECTRONICALLY ELCTRONICALY FILED - 2023 Oct 18 10:31 AM - RIC-HLAND COMN PLEAS - 203CP41759203CP401759 DIRECTORATE ELCTRONIAY CHAIRMAN FILED - P.

FILE NAME Colonial Sugar Refinery CSR DATE 1961 Nov 6 DOC CSR210 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Govt Inspection Results - Wittenoom Dangerous Dust Menace o. t

FILE NAME Colonial Sugar Refinery CSR DATE 1964 & 1965 DOC CSR069 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Govt Inspection Results - Dust Counts and Temperatures Recorded in Wittenoom Mine and Plant : Vr GOVERNMENT of WESTERN AUSTRALIA WESTERN MD. 20.

FILE NAME Firestone FIRE DATE 1968-1993 DOC FIRE006 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Firestone Purchases - Brake shoes and brakes packing insulation at Decatur Plant Ex 40 S.5 REV 8-66 1 - PRINTED PRINTED PURCHASE ORDER 4-23-68 1/2 OF -10-25 AKRON 107483-711047483-714 SELLER MCNEIL MCNEIL MAKRON CORPORATION 96 EAST CROSIER STREET AKRON OHIO SHIP TO L DECATUR PLANT SHIP VIA 2-1771 BOMBALL QUANTITY RECEIVED QUANTITY ETEM PLEASE SPECIFICATIONS OUR ORDER FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS PER SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS RECEIVED NO QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PRICE DISCOUNT EA DOME GASKET SEALS FOR 55 BOM 83- | 3716-5 3716-5 | FTR 143-0495 6.30 EA EA 7.65 SHIP TO ARRIVE AT OUR PLANT ON 5-18-68 DIRECT NU: CORRESPONDENCE PURCHASING DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO PURCHASING DEPT ATTN 040 ISSUED BY JACKSON 059903 S.S REV PRINTED PRINTED IN USA 5-68 DATE 3-5-69 PURCHASE ORDER F TERMS F.O.B. 1/2 of -10 Akron DC 113602-714 | RELEASE NUMBER SELLER McNeil Akron Corporation East Crosier 96 Crosier Street Akron , Ohio SHIP TO SHIP VIA 2-1771 Hector QUANTITY RECEIVED Decatur Plant QUANTITY RECEIVED ITEM NO QUANTITY PLEASE ENTER OUR ORDER FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS PER SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS _ DESCRIPTION PRICE DISCOUNT 20 ea Dome gasket seals 55 bom 143-0495 R3-3716- 7.65 ea CORESPONDENCE ow A at 4 DIRECT CORRESPONDENCE TO PURCHASING DEPT PURCHASING ATTN DELIVERY REQUIRED 4-1-69 12300 12300 When remitting your invoice note that tax will apply after payment discount This is in accordance with illinois law which permits the purchaser purchaser to claim sales tax credit to the extent extent of discount allowed ISSUED BY + JACKSON 059922 5-5 REV 5-68 PRUI.NSThED 5-68 DATE 8-6-69 - : PURCHASE ORDER . 1 Sas UhY ~ubP~ LAS~YubP~ LASY eee WE F ERP TERMS F.O.B

FILE NAME Manville JMA DATE 1969 Nov 21 DOC JMA025 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Meeting Minutes - Asbestos Cement Products Association Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY SPEECH TO BE GIVEN BY HERBERT MORTON BALL TO HEALTH AND SAFETY COUNCIL ASBESTOS CEMENT PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION FIRST ANNUAL MEETING NOVEMBER 21 1969 GENTLEMEN I AM GOING TO DEPART FROM THE CUSTOM OF CONTEMPORARY SPEAKING AND NOT BEGIN MY ADDRESS THIS MORNING WITH A JOKE OR ANECDOTE THE SUBJECT IS TOO SERIOUS WE ARE GOING TO TALK THIS MORNING ABOUT THE POTENTIAL PROBLEMS OF COMMON LAW LIABILITY FACING YOUR COMPANIES AS MANUFACTURERS OF PRODUCTS THAT CONTAIN ASBESTOS FIBER AS AN INGREDIENT AT THE OUTSET LET IT BE CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO DISCUSS IN HOUSE PROBLEMS THAT IS THE POSSIBLE HEALTH PROBLEMS OF YOUR OWN EMPLOYEES AS A RESULT OF THEIR INHALATION OF ASBESTOS FIBERS DURING THE COURSE OF THEIR JOB PERFORMANCE IN YOUR VARIOUS MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS THESE PROBLEMS ARE GENERALLY COVERED BY WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND LEGALLY SPEAKING PRESENT A DIFFERENT SUBJECT THAN THAT OF THIRD PRODUCT LIABILITY TODAY WE ARE ONLY DISCUSSING YOUR POTENTIAL EXPOSURE UNDER THE COMMON LAW TO ASBESTOSIS CLAIMS BY THIRD PARTIES THAT IS PERSONS WHO ARE NOT YOUR EMPLOYEES INSOFAR AS ASBESTOSIS IS CONCERNED THERE ARE ESSENTIALLY FOUR CLASSES OF POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS : 1 THE FIRST CLASS WOULD ENCOMPASS PEOPLE WHO NORMALLY WORK DAY TO DAY WITH PRODUCTS MADE BY YOU THAT CONTAIN ASBESTOS AND WHO BECAUSE OF THEIR HANDLING SAWING NAILING AND SO FORTH OF THESE PRODUCTS ARE EXPOSED TO THE ASBESTOS FIBERS THAT ARE UNAVOIDABLY LIBERATED PRODUCED JM - 83 INTO THE ATMOSPHERE THIS EXPOSURE IF PROPER SAFETY AND HOUSEKEEPING PROCEDURES ARE NOT FOLLOWED IS A MORE OR LESS CONTINUING ONE THE SECOND CLASS OF POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS WOULD BE COMPOSED OF THE CALLED NEIGHBORHOOD PLAINTIFFS THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO LIVED NEAR A PLANT OR MINING OR MILLING FACILITY THAT EMITTED ASBESTOS FIBERS INTO THE ATMOSPHERE ON A MORE OR LESS CONTINUOUS BASIS FOR A LENGTHY PERIOD OF TIME THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH A CLASS OF PLAINTIFFS APPEARING ON THE SCENE IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE MUST BE RECOGNIZED THE THIRD GROUP OF POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS ARE THOSE PEOPLE WHO MIGHT USE ASBESTOS CEMENT PRODUCTS FROM TIME TO TIME WITHOUT BEING EMPLOYED AS FULL APPLICATORS OR INSTALLERS OF SUCH PRODUCTS AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE A FARMER WHO OCCASIONALLY PURCHASED ASBESTOS CEMENT SHINGLES DIRECTLY FROM A DEALER AND INSTALLED THEM HIMSELF UPON VARIOUS BUILDINGS ON HIS FARM ON THE BASIS OF PRESENT MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ANY ASBESTOSIS RISK TO SUCH PERSONS THE LAST CATEGORY OF POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS IS BOTH THE LARGEST AND LEAST IT IS THE LARGEST BECAUSE IT IS THE PUBLIC GENERALLY IT COMPRISES ALL PERSONS WHO ARE NOT EMPLOYEES INVOLVED IN THE MINING MILLING OR FABRICATING PROCESSES AND WHO DO NOT FALL WITHIN THE FIRST THREE | CATEGORIES DESCRIBED HOWEVER IT IS THE LEAST BECAUSE PRODUCED JM - 83 BASED ON OUR PRESENT UNDERSTANDING OF THE DISEASE OF ASBESTOSIS AND ITS CAUSATION WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ANY ASBESTOSIS RISK TO THE PUBLIC GENERALLY HERE HOWEVER I WANT TO MAKE ONE VERY IMPORTANT POINT WE ARE TODAY SPEAKING ABOUT THE RISKS OF ASBESTOSIS WE ARE NOT SPEAKING ABOUT OTHER DISEASES WHICH SOME MEDICAL MEN ATTRIBUTE TO ASBESTOS INHALATION SUCH AS BRONCHOGENIC CANCER OR MESOTHELIOMA SOME RATHER WILD THEORIES HAVE BEEN EXPOUNDED AS TO THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ASBESTOS AND SUCH DISEASES ONE SUCH THEORY HOLDS THAT THE INHALATION AND RETENTION IN THE BODY OF ONE SINGLE FIBER OF ASBESTOS MAY CAUSE MESOTHELIOMA THIRTY YEARS LATER WE DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THIS THEORY OBVIOUSLY IF SUCH A THEORY SHOULD HOWEVER ULTIMATELY BE SUBSTANTIATED WE WOULD BE TALKING ABOUT AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT BALL GAME BOTH IN LEGAL THEORY AND AS A PRACTICAL MATTER FOR TODAY HOWEVER MY REMARKS WILL BE CONFINED TO THE SPECIFIC PROBLEM OF ASBESTOSIS THEREFORE WE WILL ONLY BE CONSIDERING PLAINTIFFS IN THE FIRST =5 THE TWO CATEGORIES DISCUSSED IN ORDER THAT YOU MAY BETTER UNDERSTAND THE LAW TODAY AS IT PERTAINS TO THE ASBESTOSIS PROBLEMS OF REALISTIC CONCERN TO YOUR COMPANIES YOU SHOULD KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT ITS DEVELOPMENT THIRD PARTY CLAIMS NO MATTER IN WHICH OF THE EARLIER DESCRIBED CATEGORIES THE PLAINTIFF BELONGS ARE FOUNDED IN WHAT IS CALLED THE COMMON LAW THE COMMON LAW IS SOMETHING OF AN AMORPHOUS PRODUCED JM - 83 4 CONCEPT ESSENTIALLY AT ANY GIVEN TIME IT REPRESENTS THE CUMULATION AND EVOLUTION OF JUDGE MADE LAW IN ENGLAND AND THE UNITED STATES UP TO THAT TIME THIS IS IN CONTRAST TO STATUTORY LAW STATUTORY LAW IS MADE UP OF THE ENACTMENTS OF LEGISLATURES AND OTHER JUDICIAL GOVERNMENT BODIES THE COMMON LAW IS BASED UPON JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS IN THE UNITED STATES IT WAS ADOPTED FROM AND HAS GROWN AND DEVELOPED FROM THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW THE SETTLERS BROUGHT IT OVER WITH THEM HOWEVER BEAR IN MIND THE FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPT THAT THE COMMON LAW IS A CONSTANTLY CHANGING COMPOSITE OF CONCEPTS AND RULES BECAUSE IT IS THE RESULT OF EVER EMERGING JUDICIAL DECISIONS AS NEW CASES ARE BROUGHT AND DETERMINED NEW LAW IS MADE AND SOMETIMES OLD LAW IS CHANGED ON OCCASION PRIOR DECISIONS ARE DIRECTLY OVERRULED ALTHOUGH GENERALLY THE CHANGE IS A MORE GRADUAL AND SUBTLE ONE TODAY THE COMMON LAW RECOGNIZES TWO PRINCIPAL CONCEPTS WHICH ARE OF FUNDAMENTAL HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE IN TERMS OF THE PROBLEM HERE UNDER CONSIDERATION THESE ARE 1.