Document zzQ4Z4JbKaK9Yw6empp5827Lg
BACK TO MAIN
INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF L-13492 ON ACTIVATIED SLUDGE RESPIRATION ~
jIl REPORT COMPLETED: July 26,1995
Prepared by: SusrvlA. Beach Advanced Environmental Biologist 3M Environmental Laboratory
Bldg. 2-3E-09 935 Bush Ave. St. IPaul, MN 55144
BACK TO MAIN
I
t
P
Activated Sludge Reeplration Inhibition
Page 1
July 26, 1QQ5
23JMWiY The purpose of this stu& was to evaluate the inhibitory effect of L-13492 on aerobic sludge system inaccordance with the 'Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Telst', OECD No. 208. The
median effective concentration, 3-hour EC50, and the 95% confidence interval were reported as
> 1000 (-) mg/L.
lMmtuau Toxicity tests with aerobic sludge provide a rapid screening method and are relieble predictors
of the inhibitory effects of potential contaminants on the operation of activated sludge treatment systems.
This toxicity study measured the respirat;oo rate of activated sludlge obtained from a municipal
wastewater treatment system and followed decreases in Uie rate of oxygen consumption over a relatively short period (30-minutes to 3-hours) in the presence of different concentrations of
L-13492.
WTFRIAI S AND bEIHQQs
Jest Substance:
Appearance
L-13492, Lot 2, 45% solids, 5/4/95 Clear, coiorlass liquid
Aqueous Solubility
Apparently completely miscible with water.
Physicochemical Properties: See MSDS. This sample contains 44.9% product. 27.2% isopropyl alcohol and 27.9% water.
Date Received
Not recorded
Storage
In the dark at ambient rocim temperature (22 2 2OC)
Stock Solution
Reportedvalues .
MA; direct weights were used
The reported values were based on nominail concentrations in the lest media et the beginning of !he microbial assay.
Controls:
Functional Control (Reference substance)
phenol (3.5-DCP). Aldrich Chemical Company, P.O. Box 355, Milwaukee, WI, 5320. Lot 00410K2, Received 9/28/94.
Blank control (untreated)
Two test vessels containing inoculum and nutrient medium, but no test or reference chemicals, one at the start and Uie othor at the end of the test series.
BACK TO MAIN
Activated Sludge Respiratior1 Inhibition
Page 2 July 26, 1995
Microbial Inoculum
Activated sludge mixed liquor was obtained from the St. Paul, Mn
- MetropolitanWastewater Treatment Plant on test day. The suspended
solids level was adjusted to 3.8 f .148 fl.; pH 6.0 7.7; and the
dissolved oxygen concentration at or near saturation.
Nutrient Medium
Synthetic sewage feed prepared on test day as outlined in the method.
Exoosure:
ScreeningTest Datos:
5/22/95, 611195, 6115.195, 6/22/95
Final Test Date
6/29/95
Contact Time
30-minutes and 3-hour while aeration takiss place.
Vessels
1200 mL Borosilicaie glasf;Fleakersw vessels
Test Solution Vol.
500 mL
Starting Test Conc. Test Substance
1000 mgL, in duplicate
ReferenceSubstance 10 mgL
Limit Test:
I I/
A limit test may be performed at 1000 m#L (in duplicate) in order to determine that the EC50 i:; greater than this concentraticrl. If 2 5 0 %
inhibition in respiration is seen, then a full test should be conducted.
Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids Level in Test Media
1.6 g L
Millipore Milii-OTMwater
18.6 - 21.0 O C
t
(I
Mixin-s and Aeration
' Measurements /I ,
3 1 Procedure
nthually aerated with clean, oil-free air.
ations (using dissolved oxygen meter and BOD flasks) were measured after 30-minutes end 3-hours contact time.
The test was conducted in accordancewith the "Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test', OECD No. 209 ('1. Values were reported to different levels of significaiice depending on the accuracy of the measuring devicesinvolvedin any one process.
BACK TO MAIN
Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Page 3 July 26, 1995
I2uulxm
The reportedvalues are based on nominalconcentrationsin the test media at the beginning of the test, The concentrations tested and the corresponding response data derived from the toxicity test are used to calculate, if possible, the medial effective concentralion, 'EC50' a d the 95% confidence interval by standard logistic regression methods (Le.. Probit Analysis, Trknmed Spearman-Karber). The EC5o is defined as the concentration estimated to inhibit the rate of respirationby 50% as compared to the controls, after 30-minutes and 3-hours of exposure to the test substance.
RESULTS There were some difficulties encountered in obtaining test results. 'The initial screening (limit) test indicated toxicity and the need for a study with lower concentraticns. The second study shcwed low toxicity. The third stcL, was invalid due to unacceptable differlances in control respiration rates. The fourth study also ii.c%ated low toxicity. The final study was initiated to confirm the second and fourth study results. It is possible that in the first study, an error in test solution preparation resulted in loading the test system with more test substance than planned. This could have induced a greater inhibition in respiration rate. The definitive percent reduction in respiration rate and the median effective concentration, 'EC50'. obtained after 30-minutes and 3-hours exposure to the test subsktnce L-13492 and reference substance 3,5-Dichlorophenol are summarized in Table 1. The median effective concentration, 3-hour 'EC50' of L-13492 to activated sludge was determined and was reported as z 1000 mgL. A 95% Confidence Intervalcould not be calculated.
ACCFPTABlLllY C R r m
This toxicity test meets quality criteria provided in test guidelines:
1) The two blank control respiration rates were within 15 percenl of each other. 2) The 3-hour percent inhibition induced by the reference substance, '3.5-DCP', was within the range of values historically obtained using thils mixed liquor source in this laboratory.
-- 3 ) The reportedvaiues were based on nominalconcentratioris in the test media at the eginning of the microbial assay.
This test was conductedby G.W. Jorgensen as requestedby Steven J. Martiri of 3M SCD Lab, SI.Paul, MN.
This study was not condircted under strict Good Laboratory Practices, but was conducted under the standard operating procedures for this laboratory. The [rawdote was reviewed by SA. Beach prior to reporting. Copies of all raw data are included with this report.
This study was conducted under 3M EnvironmentalLab Request number N2169.
BACK TO MAIN
Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition
Page 4 July 26, 1995
EEEEEam
1. OECD (1984). Activated Sludge Respiration lnhbition Test, Test No. 209. In: Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Orpfkation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.
2. OECD. 1981. Principles of Good Laboratory Practice. Annex 2, C(B1)30 (Final):7-28. OECD Guidelinesfor Testing of Chemicals. Organization for Economic Cooperah and Development, Paris, France.
-1000
Duplicate
EC50
FXDQSULB none
7 1000
3 B > 1000
Not calculable
Not ciilculable
ACTNATED SLUDGEMIXED UQUOR
BACK TO MAIN I
PERRENCE SUBSTAN=
Test Temperature Range:
Comments
f x (c10210 OC
<"y {t'lv\r` \ I .
-
BACK TO MAIN
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
OECD ACTNATED SLUDGE RESPIRATION INHIBITIONTEST #209 TEST SOLUTIONS PREPARATION
L- Test Substance:
c I . . Sample Description:
I3491
en r
lb !AIJ
Y
BACK TO MAIN
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
OECD ACTIVATED SLUDGE RESPIRATION INHIBITION TEST 11209 RAW DATA
7
i. 30-MINUTE EXPOSURE
DISSOLVED OXYGEN c I o N c m n a s ,mgrl
DISSOLVED OXYGEN c m c m n m s , m s / ~
BACK TO MAIN
i
CA
wt
_
Son
l FE Eitle Se e e NSeL is To e ouhn es eo e use per Th spee ee epe eR sTPenene E PrmRaaO) Pe))
J pbpee em E + e +
mpE eaS EEE p e uf ss oe pT e me ntpe.pr epp raoeEmEaRE)
cy=soaisl==F=EE = E Eee=b=-eE F ==b_e -- H= - re-- e e eF ----R --e e--e e ------
=
e
i
et,
iE
i
Pe
=
+
am
BACK TO MAIN
I ------ :
{
LpeySNet2/8
i i; ENVIROMENTAL LABORATORY
LAT HRT
i pA
rSounnplesoDoms.er:3M.i5 DcihckClhcaorpihceesCea! RReofdoLcaesbceelSLuobbsheacyeickcz
Any:
owe: sicksoon
es
Snir 03th
Re L
e Hien R e -- e a--------
coms ratios. mio)wa olor semis chy Touveka
peg t a Te2m74p WO7R3 e 200 T $20
= _
I --
_ = :
i
__-- --
= T
_ V--__--s-- WR an py :
||
BACK TO MAIN
Test Substance:
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY
OECD ACTIVATED SLUDGE RESPIRATION INHIBITION TEST #209
RAW DATA
.1
3 ?-D,hL/
hN d r o,_o
0
NCP
Date ~ t ~ ~ i 6'~ eZLd7:
Analyst:
>i3 e
be 2mi0o8d = gn
Bm
B83
BEBeagd) i=EEA = E=e
BACK TO MAIN
P S RS tpe et A fom R! Eeine
rrRew os
f ee EP EEEr EE ee e e e eer e efoen |
+ SE
bbetet oy
--
ent
a
Eh e h eee fetesfoTeToo
asTaSeTSasTeaatsaTor
oeToe]
[RERee)
a E === E
b Demmnme Ae E p-- aTs
2x|
BACK TO MAIN
LFvr
Po b
ex F
pJfise.
wot p( g Ge
REEee R=] LpRES SREwoia as| 5 ------
senda
As asl
[TTTTNT
7
jE es(Vomit
CCT
x
fais Soda ala | [CTC
Bas@wens mesmeylems wlTTT
LL
i i ES0
|
fer TT ia 1
mods. gpilin
Ef
Trrrr
wha
LTTr 1
B dees
sg
CHE
AA A
eae ee LL
LLL
pL Er
NE
|
BRE EINECe Naa| ge (Oa BLE--Ido (1FuckJaa 450 poslel 75 |
OS
oa jem oT) [OJ TT TTT
`wa i
ORNS fate | ian
eo |saws | oes wwe:
EE
| >oo
Ey |||
04/01 /2001
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ARCHIVED FINAL REPORT
1BACK TO MAIN
LAB REQUEST NO. N2169
REQUESTOR NAME: SAB/S.J. MARTIN
DEPARTMENT: 3048 PROJECT NO: BI703004UQ DATE RECEIVED: 05/17/1995 DESC: L-13492 ECOTOX TESTING
CONTRACT LAB(!$) : EXP COMP DATE: 07/03/1995 DATE COMPLETED: 01/30/1996 PROJECT LEAD: PHONIE NO: 3M FAX NO: 65'1 -778-6176
Results from Microtox Test:
Test Conc. mg/L 125 250 500 1000 EC50 95% C . I . sab 5/19/95
PERCENT LIGHT LOSS
5-min exp.
15-min exp.
13
29
19
43
37
65
75
92
(590
- 630 665)
300
(270 - 330)
30-min exp. 34 51 75 97
260 (220 - 300)
Activated Sludge Respiration I n h i b i t i o n Test Results: There were some d i f f i c u l t i e s encountered i n o b t a i n i n g t e s t r e s u l t s . The i n i t i a l screening ( l i m i t ) t e s t i n d i c a t e d t o x i c i t y and t h e need ,for a study w i t h lower concentrations. The second study showed low t o x i c i t y . The t h i r d study was i n v a l i d due t o unacceptable d i f f e r e n c e s i n c o n t r o l r e s p i r a t i o n rates. The f o u r t h study a l s o i n d i c a t e d low t o x i c i t y . The f i n a l study was i n i t i a t e d t o confirm t h e second and f o u r t h study r e s u l t s . I t i s p o s s i b l e t h a t i n t h e f i r s t study an e r r o r i n t e s t s o l u t i o n preparation r e s u l t e d i n l o a d i n g t h e t e s t system w i t h more t e s t substance than planned. This could have induced a g r e a t e r i n h i b i t i o n i n r e s p i r a t i o n r a t e . SAB 7/31/95
Test Conc.
mg/L 1000
Duplicate
Percent I n h i b i t i o n i n Respiration Rate
30-min Exposure
3 -Hour Exposure
0
18
0
22
EC50
>loo0
>loo0
SAB 7/31/95 NOTE: 3-HR r e s u l t s updated 2/19/96. An e r r o r was discovered i n c a l c u l a t i o n s of percent i n h i b i t i o n . sab 2/19/96 SEE LR N2332 FOR FISH, DAPHNIA, AND ALGAE TOXICITY TEST RESULTS. SAB 7/31/95
1 05/04/95 L-13492
LIQUID
MICROTOX MICROTOX - EC50
260 MG/L.
04/01 /2001
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ARCHIVED FINAL REPORT
(220 - 300)
2
1 05/04/95 L-13492
LIQUID
SLUE-RESP SLUDGE RESPIRATION - EC50
>lo00 MG/L
BACK TO MAIN