Document zzJDDmV3JNG27XKpRx5nMy1Q7

fiR S - IA 3U - RECEIVED OFFr-I'CcnE-TPO?k Lf"tu1J*A-- ^ FEB 2 \ Z002 DECEMBER 2002 SURFACE WATER MONITORING REPORT FOR WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY AND LOCAL, LETART AND DRY RUN LANDFILLS WASHINGTON, WV Date: February 2003 Project No.: D6WW7423.01 18983632.00028 18983633.00026 18983634.00026 Ccum Co A CORPORATE REMEDIATION GROUP An Alliance between DuPont and URS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 m. s5V '"rtf WVDEP 17201 0001S5 Surface W a ter Monitoring Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................1 2.0 C-8 Analytical Reporting.............................................................................................2 3.0 Washington Works Facility.........................................................................................4 4.0 Local Landfill............................................................................................................... 5 5.0 Letart Landfill.............................................................................................................. 6 6.0 Dry Run Landfill.......................................................................................................... 7 7.0 References.................................................................................................................... 8 Table 1.0 Table 2.0 Table 3.0 Table 4.0 C-8 in C-8 in C-8 in C-8 in TABLES Surface Water - Washington Works Facility Surface Water - Local Landfill Surface Water - Letart Landfill Surface Water - Dry Run Landfill Figure 1.0 Figure 1.1 Figure 1.2 Figure 2.0 Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 3.0 Figure 3.1 Figure 3.2 Figure 4.0 Figure 4.1 Figure 4.2 FIGURES Site Location Map - Washington Works Facility Surface Water Sample Location Map - Washington Works Facility C-8 Concentration Map December 2002 - Washington Works Facility Surface Water Site Location Map - Local Landfill Surface Water Sample Location Map - Local Landfill C-8 Concentration Map December 2002 - Local Landfill Outfalls Site Location Map - Letart Landfill Surface Water Sample Location Map - Letart Landfill C-8 Concentration Map December 2002 - Letart Landfill Outfalls Site Location Map - Dry Run Surface Water Sample Location Map - Dry Run Landfill C-8 Concentration Map December 2002 - Dry Run Landfill Outfalls D EC SWMR.doc Feb. 11, 03 Wilmington, DE OOOISG Surface W ater Monitoring Report Table of Contents Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H APPENDICES Laboratory Analytical Data Reports - Washington Works Facility Chain-of-Custody Records - Washington Works Facility Laboratory Analytical Data Reports - Local Landfill Chain-of-Custody Records - Local Landfill Laboratory Analytical Data Reports - Letart Landfill Chain-of-Custody Records - Letart Landfill Laboratory Analytical Data Reports - Dry Run Landfill Chain-of-Custody Records - Dry Run Landfill DEC SWMR.doc Feb. 11, 03 Wilmington, DE 0001S7 Surface W a ter Monitoring Report Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION A multi-media consent order (Order No. GWR-2001-019) was entered into between the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources - Bureau for Public Health (WVDHHRBPH) and DuPont on November 15, 2001 (Consent Order). The Consent Order identified a series of requirements and tasks to be performed by the parties to determine whether there has been an impact on human health and the environment as a result of releases of ammonium perfluorooctanoate (C-8), CAS Number 3825-26-1, to the environment from DuPont operations at the Washington Works facility and the associated landfills (Local, Letart and Dry Run). The Consent Order established the C-8 Groundwater Investigation Steering Team (GIST) to oversee investigations and activities that will be conducted to assess the presence and extent of C-8 in drinking water, groundwater, and surface water at and around the Washington Works facility and the Local, Letart and Dry Run Landfills. An additional component of the Consent Order relates to the West Virginia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (WV NPDES) permit sampling requirements. In this portion of the Consent Order, specific outfalls and outlets (outfalls) are to be sampled monthly for C-8 by DuPont. Pursuant to Attachment A of the Consent Order, three tasks were performed by DuPont and evaluated by the GIST, Tasks A, B, and C. Task A: Groundwater Use and Well Survey/Groundwater Monitoring was completed (DuPont, 2002a; 2002b). Task B: Assessment of Existing Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Data included compiling of historical C-8 data, monitoring all wells at the landfills and developing a Groundwater Monitoring Plan (GMP) for the Washington Works facility. The first part of the task, the historical C-8 data compilation report was submitted to the GIST for evaluation (DuPont, 2002c). The second part of this task, monitoring C-8 in groundwater at the landfills, began in December 2001, and was performed monthly for four months and quarterly thereafter. The third part of the task, developing a GMP for the Washington Works facility, was submitted to the GIST (DuPont, 2002d). Groundwater sampling at the Washington Works facility began in January 2002, and was conducted monthly for four months and quarterly thereafter. Task C: Plume Identification/Groundwater Assessment is ongoing. This report presents the results of the monthly (December 2002) C-8 surface water sampling that was performed in December 2002 at the Washington Works facility, and the Local, Letart, and Dry Run Landfills. DEC SW M R.doc Feb. 11, 03 Wilmington, DE 000158 1 Surface W ater Monitoring Report C-8 Analytical Reporting 2.0 C-8 ANALYTICAL REPORTING The analytical method, method detection limit, and laboratory utilized for C-B analysis have changed over time. Prior to 1991, DuPont performed C-8 analysis at the DuPont Experimental Station in Wilmington, Delaware. In 1991, when the RCRA Verification Investigation was conducted, the analysis was contracted to the CFLMHill Laboratory in Montgomery, Alabama. Both labs used a Gas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detector (GC-ECD) based analytical method with detection limits for C-8 that ranged from 0.1 to 1.0 ug/1. CELMHill conducted C-8 analysis for DuPont into the fall of 1998 when the laboratory ceased operation. The C-8 analytical work was transferred to Lancaster Laboratories, Lancaster, PA, in March 1999. Lancaster Laboratories continued to conduct C-8 analysis using GC-ECD for DuPont until October 2001, when development and testing was completed on a new analytical method developed by Exygen Research, Inc. (Exygen; located in State College, PA) that utilizes Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). DuPont adopted the regular use of LC/MS/MS for C-8 analysis in water in November 2001 and Exygen was contracted to perform the analyses for DuPont. Exygen reports C-8 results for the laboratory replicate of each field sample. These results are evaluated for precision by comparing the field sample result to the corresponding laboratory replicate result. If both results are less than the practical quantitation limit (PQL), the replicate sample for that analyte is considered to have passed the precision criteria. If one or both results are between one and five times the PQL, the replicate is considered to have met the precision criteria if the two results differ by less than the PQL. If one result is less than the PQL and the other is not, and if the two results differed by a value less than the PQL, the replicate is said to have met the acceptance criteria. If both results are at least five times the PQL, the replicate is considered to have met the criteria if the relative percent difference (RPD) between the two results is less than or equal to 20%. The RPD is the absolute value of the difference of two measurements divided by their average. When the precision criteria outlined above are met, Exygen reports the average of the field sample and lab replicate results reported by the laboratory. If criteria for precision are exceeded, Exygen reports the higher of the sample and lab replicate results. Finally, when one result (from the sample/lab replicate pair) is above the PQL and one below, the result that is above the PQLs is reported. C-8 results are recorded in the Corporate Environmental Database (CED) and are reported as FC-143 for consistency with historical results. An aliquot of each field sample is also analyzed as a matrix spike (MS). Results of the MS analysis are used to assess accuracy. The MS recovery value must fall between 70 to DEC SWMR.doc Feb. 11, 03 Wilmington, DE 000159 2 Surface W a te r Monitoring Report C-8 Analytical Reporting 130%, unless the sample concentration is at least four times the amount spiked. The maximum amount used to spike field samples is 500 ug/L. All data packages generated by Exygen are reviewed in-house for compliance with the laboratory Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and data usability, using the checklist provided in the QAPP. Results of the in-house review indicate that data reported by Exygen have been generated in compliance with the laboratory SOP, with few exceptions as noted in the individual review summaries. All data reported by Exygen have been judged usable for the purposes of the project. DEC SW M R.doc Feb. 11, 03 Wilmington, DE 000160 3 Surface W a ter Monitoring Report Washington Works Facility 3.0 WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY Figure 1.0 shows the location of the Washington Works facility. On December 9, 2002, six outfalls were sampled for C-8 (001, 002, 003, 005, 007, and 105). All of these outfalls collect process water and stormwater runoff. No other changes to routine sampling protocols or other observations were recorded in the field notes during this sampling event. Monthly sampling of these outfalls is required by the Consent Order and WV NPDES permit No. WV0001279. The locations of these outfalls are shown in Figure 1.1. Table 1.0 provides the C-8 analytical results for surface water. For each sampling point listed in the table, historical data is summarized with the most recent results listed first. Figure 1.2 presents the C-8 concentration map for the outfalls sampled in December. Laboratory analytical data reports and the Chain-of-Custody records are included in Appendix A and B, respectively. DEC SW MR.doc Feb. 11, 03 Wilmington, DE 000161 4 Surface W a ter Monitoring Report Local Landfill 4.0 LOCAL LANDFILL Figure 2.0 shows the location of the Local Landfill. Monthly sampling of five outfalls is required by the Consent Order and the WV NPDES permit No. WV0076538. These five outfalls collect stormwater runoff. On December 13, 2002, 004(01d), 004(New), and 005(01d)/SSl, and 005(New) were sampled for C-8. Outfall 101 was sampled for C-8 on December 16, 2002. An additional point, Outlet LM1 (Leachate), was also sampled on December 16,2002. This point is a bi-annual permit required monitoring point. On the chain of custody, this point was labeled Leachate Inlet 002. The locations of these six outfalls are shown in Figure 2.1. Table 2.0 presents the C-8 analytical results for the December surface water samples. The table includes the historic data available for each location sampled. The data are presented with the most recent data first. Figure 2.2 presents the C-8 concentration map for the outfalls sampled in December. Laboratory analytical data reports and Chain-ofCustody records are provided in Appendices C and D, respectively. DEC SWMR.doc Feb. 11,03 Wilmington, DE 000162 5 Surface W a ter Monitoring Report Letart Landfill 5.0 LETART LANDFILL Figure 3.0 presents the Letart Landfill location map. Monthly sampling of Outfalls 002 and 003 (both containing stormwater runoff) and Cap Runoff (which collects leachate and stormwater runoff) is required by the Consent Order. The location of Outfall 002, Outfall 003, and the Cap Runoff samples are shown in Figure 3.1. On December 30, 2002, sampling was conducted at Outfall 002, and Cap Runoff. Sampling was attempted at Outfall 003 but no-flow conditions were encountered at the time of sampling. The C-8 results for the December surface water are presented in Table 3.0. For each sampling point listed in the table, historical data is summarized with the most recent results listed first. In the September 2002 monthly monitoring report, a sample taken on 9/27/02 for the Cap Runoff surface water location, was inadvertently named Stormwater Runoff. The incorrect name was carried through the October/Q402 and November 2002 monthly monitoring reports. This data point has been moved to the correct chronological spot under Cap Runoff in Table 3.0. Figure 3.2 presents the C-8 concentration map for the outfalls sampled in December. Appendices E and F present the laboratory analytical data reports and the Chain-ofCustody records, respectively. D EC SWMR.doc Feb. 11, 03 Wilmington, DE 000163 6 Surface W ater Monitoring Report Pry Run Landfill 6.0 DRY RUN LANDFILL Figure 4.0 shows the location of the Dry Run Landfill. Monthly sampling of Outfalls 001, 003, and 004 is required by the Consent Order and WV NPDES permit No. WV0076244. (Outfall 002 is a required outfall sampling location as stated in WV NPDES permit No. WV0076244. However, it was a temporary relocation of Outfall 001 and no longer exists). Outfall 001 collects stormwater and leachate. Outfalls 003 and 004 collect stormwater only. The locations of the surface water sampling points are shown in Figure 4.1. On December 30, 2002, Outfall 001 was sampled. During the month of December, Outfalls 003 and 004 were not sampled due to no-flow conditions. Table 4.0 presents the C-8 analytical results for the December surface water samples. For each sampling point listed in the table, historical data are summarized with the most recent results presented first. Figure 4.2 presents the C-8 concentration map for the outfall sampled in December. Laboratory analytical data reports and Chain-of-Custody records are provided in Appendices G and H, respectively. DEC SWMR.doc Feb. 1 1 ,0 3 Wilmington, DE 000164 7 Surface W ater Monitoring Report References 7.0 REFERENCES DuPont. 2002a. One-Mile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling Report and Ohio River Public Water Supply Sampling, DuPont Washington Works (December 2001February 2002) January 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. DuPont. 2002b. Two-Mile Radius Survey and C-8 Sampling, DuPont Washington Works Facility/Local Landfill, West Virginia (March-May 2002) August 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. DuPont. 2002c. Compilation o fHistorical C-8 Data, DuPont Washington Works Main Plant and Landfills January 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. DuPont. 2002d. Proposed Groundwater Monitoring Planfo r Washington Works Facility Plant and Landfills January 2002. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group and URS Diamond. DEC SW MR.doc Feb. 1 1 ,0 3 Wilmington, DE 000165 8 TABLES 000166 Table 1.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water DuPont Washington Works Facility Washington, WV S am ple OUTLET 001 OUTFALL 002 OUTLET 003 D ate 1 2 /9 /0 2 1 1 /1 3 /0 2 1 0 /1 8 /0 2 9 /2 4/02 8/2 7/02 7/2 3/02 . 6/2 5/02 5/2 0/02 4/1 6/02 3 /1 9/02 2 /5 /0 2 1 /1 7 /0 2 1 2 /2 0 /0 1 1 2 /9 /0 2 1 1 /1 3 /0 2 11/13/02 (dup) 1 0 /1 8 /0 2 9 /2 4 /0 2 8/2 7/02 8 /2 7/02 (dup) 7 /2 3/02 6 /2 5/02 6 /2 5 /0 2 (dup) 5 /2 0/02 4/1 6/02 3/1 9/02 2 /5 /0 2 1 /1 7 /0 2 1 2 /2 0 /0 1 1 1 /2 6 /0 1 * 1 0 /2 5 /0 1 9 /1 9 /0 1 7 /1 1 /0 1 6 /1 4 /0 1 5 /3 1 /0 1 4 /1 1 /0 1 3 /2 1 /0 1 2 /1 4 /0 1 1 2 /9 /0 2 1 1 /1 3 /0 2 1 0 /1 8 /0 2 9/2 4/02 8 /2 7/02 7 /2 3/02 6/2 5/02 5 /2 0/02 4/1 6/02 3 /1 9 /0 2 3 /1 9 /0 2 (dup) 2 /5 /0 2 1 /1 7 /0 2 1/17/02 (dup) 1 2 /2 0 /0 1 c-e ( u b / i) 9 .7 6 1 7 .0 1 0 .5 2 .1 5 2.9 4 8 .6 3 1 7 .9 2 2 .4 1 9 .7 2 1 .4 9 .4 3 1 0 .9 3.7 20 2.3 7 4.7 5 5 .2 8 3.4 9 2.1 4 2.5 6 2 .5 1 2 .2 9 3.8 6 3.81 4.1 3 2.4 5 5.8 5 4 .6 6 4.2 3 1 .9 8 0 4.8 4 2 .8 0.1 18 0 .5 5 8 0.5 94 0.4 36 1 .5 8 .5 4 1 .7 4 0.6 80 1 .2 4 0.8 70 0.3 17 0.2 6 8 0 .2 9 1 0.1 75 0.5 03 2.7 6 2 .9 1 2 .8 1 1.33 0.9 56 3.9 9 0.7 13 02/11/03 1 of 2 000167 Table 1 0.doc Table 1.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water DuPont Washington Works Facility Washington, WV S am ple OUTFALL 005 OUTLET 007 OUTLET 105 D ate 1 2 /9 /0 2 12 /9/02 (dup) 1 1 /1 3 /0 2 1 0 /1 8 /0 2 9/2 4/02 9 /2 4/02 (dup) 8 /2 7 /0 2 7 /2 3 /0 2 6 /2 5 /0 2 5 /2 0 /0 2 5 /1 7 /0 2 4/1 6/02 3/1 9/02 2/5 /0 2 1 /1 7 /0 2 1 2 /2 0 /0 1 1 2 /2 0 /0 1 (d u p ) 1 1 /2 6 /0 1 10/25/01 9 /1 9 /0 1 8 /3 0 /0 1 7 /1 1 /0 1 6 /1 4 /0 1 5 /3 1 /0 1 4 /1 1 /0 1 3 /2 1 /0 1 2 /1 4 /0 1 1 2 /9 /0 2 1 1 /1 3 /0 2 1 0 /1 8 /0 2 10/18/02 (dup) 9 /2 4 /0 2 m im 7/2 3/02 7/2 3/02 (dup) 6 /2 5 /0 2 5 /2 0 /0 2 4 /1 6 /0 2 3 /1 9 /0 2 2 /5 /0 2 2 /5 /0 2 (d u p ) 1 /1 7 /0 2 1 2 /2 0 /0 1 1 2 /9 /0 2 1 1 /1 3 /0 2 1 0 /1 8 /0 2 9/2 4/02 8 /2 7 /0 2 7 /2 3 /0 2 6 /2 5 /0 2 mm2 5/2 0/02 (dup) 4 /1 6 /0 2 3 /1 9 /0 2 2 /5 /0 2 1 /1 7 /0 2 12/20/01 C -8 (u g /l) 6 .3 9 6 .6 2 18.1 12.1 4 .6 4 5 .0 2 1 2 .4 1 9 .2 1 7 .9 9 8 .6 6 5 .7 3 .8 9 .2 6 1 4 1 .0 1 3 7 .0 3 1 .4 0 3 5 .2 0 915 6 5 .7 2.8 6 2.1 6 120 7 .4 1 .4 3 4.31 199 153 0 .2 6 3 8.5 6 0 .2 5 1 0.2 09 NQ (< 0.05) 0 .2 0 7 0.5 97 0 .5 4 4 0.2 84 0.4 90 0.5 67 0 .4 8 3 0.3 20 0.3 39 0.871 1 .9 9 6.0 7 1 0 .5 5 4 .6 3.6 9 6 .7 3 34 .7 3 .8 6 6 .2 7 5 .1 6 1 5 .9 1 3 .2 1 4 .6 7 .5 3 9 .7 8 Note: Analytical method changed as of November 2001 (see Section 2.0 for details). NQ = Not Quantifiable. Detected at a concentration above the LOD and below the limit of quantification (LOQ). 000168 02/11/03 2 of 2 Table 1 0.doc 02/11/03 Table 2.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Local Landfill Washington, WV Sam ple O UTFA LL 004 (N ew ) O UTFA LL 004 (O ld) OUTFALL 005 (New ) O UTFALL 00 5 (O ld)/SS1 D a te 1 2 /1 3 /0 2 1 1 /3 0 /0 2 1 0 /3 1 /0 2 9 /3 0 /0 2 8 /2 5 /0 2 7/1 /0 2 6 /1 3 /0 2 5 /2 1 /0 2 4 /2 9/02 3 /2 6 /0 2 1 2 /1 3 /0 2 1 1 /3 0 /0 2 1 0 /3 1 /0 2 9 /3 0 /0 2 8 /2 6 /0 2 7 /1 /0 2 6 /1 3 /0 2 5 /2 1 /0 2 4 /2 9 /0 2 3 /2 6 /0 2 2 /2 0 /0 2 1 /2 4 /0 2 12/13/01 9 /2 7 /2 0 0 0 1 2 /1 0 /1 9 9 9 6/3 /1 999 6/2 /1 998 5 /2 9 /1 9 9 7 4/2 /1 996 2 /1 6 /1 9 9 4 1 2 /1 3 /0 2 1 1 /3 0 /0 2 1 0 /3 1 /0 2 9 /3 0 /0 2 8 /2 6 /0 2 7 /1 /0 2 6 /1 3 /0 2 5 /2 1 /0 2 4 /2 9 /0 2 3 /2 6 /0 2 1 2 /1 3 /0 2 1 1 /3 0 /0 2 1 0 /3 1 /0 2 9 /3 0 /0 2 8 /2 6 /0 2 7 /1 /0 2 6 /1 3 /0 2 5 /2 1 /0 2 4 /2 9 /0 2 3 /2 6 /0 2 2/2 0/02 1 /1 1 /0 2 12/13/01 9 /2 7 /2 0 0 0 1 2 /1 0 /1 9 9 9 6/3 /1 999 6 /2 /1 9 9 8 5 /2 9 /1 9 9 7 4/2 /1 996 2 /1 6 /1 9 9 4 C-8 (ue/1) 10.7 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 11.2 9 .2 9 No-flow conditions 1 4 .5 1 4 .6 1 2 .5 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 1 1 .6 10.0 No-flow conditions 15 1.54 1 0 .9 1 1 .4 No-flow conditions 4 .7 3 7.1 3 .0 6 12 13 13 11 9.51 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 3 4 .3 16.0 38.1 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 32.1 2 7 .3 No-flow conditions 4 0 .9 3 9 .0 4 6 .0 51.4 No-flow conditions 13.3 34 6 .8 39 41 39 35 oooiee 1 of 2 Table 2 0.doc m Table 2.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Local Landfill Washington, WV Sample O UTLET 101 OUTLET LM1 (LEACHATE) / INLET 002 -Date 12/16/02 11/19/02 10/31/02 9/30/02 8/26/02 7/1/02 6/13/02 5/21/02 4/29/02 3/25/02 2/20/02 1/23/02 12/13/01 9/14/2000 6/3/1999 6/2/1998 12/16/02 11/21/02 C-8 (OR/1) 49.5 76.7 78.6 115.0 70.3 63.0 38.0 40.0 48.2 36.4 63.10 81.4 82.40 12 15 54 81.7 120.0 Note: Analytical method changed as of November 2001 (see Section 2.0 for details). 02/11/03 2 Of 2 000170 Table 2 O.doc Table 3.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Letart Landfill Letart, WV Sam ple D ate C-S (uk/I) 002(LEA C H A TE BA SIN ) 1 2 /3 0 /0 2 1170 1 1 /2 5 /0 2 939 1 0 /3 1 /0 2 645 9/2 7/02 4.5 2 8 /3 0 /0 2 2050 7 /3 0 /0 2 1410 6 /2 8 /0 2 Not Analyzed* 5 /3 0 /0 2 1630 4 /3 0/02 443 3 /2 8/02 131 2/1 9/02 355 1 /2 5 /0 2 50.1 1 2 /1 4 /0 1 36.1 1 1 /2 7 /2 0 0 1 5 3 .2 7 /2 0 /0 1 159 7 /2 5 /2 0 0 0 1350 4 /3 /2 0 0 0 1900 1 /1 4 /2 0 0 0 920 10 /21/1999 3240 003 1 2 /3 0 /0 2 No-Flow Conditions 1 1 /3 0 /0 2 No-Flow Conditions 1 0 /3 1 /0 2 No-Flow Conditions 9 /2 7 /0 2 0 .1 7 0 8 /3 0/02 No-Flow Conditions 7 /3 0/02 No-Flow Conditions 6 /2 8 /0 2 N ot Analyzed* 5 /3 0/02 0.2 82 4 /3 0/02 0 .0 6 5 3 3/2 8/02 0.1 98 2/1 9/02 No-Flow Conditions 1 /2 5 /0 2 0.1 48 1 2 /1 4 /0 1 0.3 90 RT 33 STREAM 1 0 /3 1 /0 2 2 .8 3 9 /2 7 /0 2 2 .2 4 8 /3 0 /0 2 No-Flow Conditions 5 /3 0 /0 2 1 .5 7 0 4/3 0/02 3 /2 8/02 0.8 45 1 .2 6 2 /1 9/02 3 .9 2 1 /2 5 /0 2 1 .9 7 /2 0 /2 0 0 1 2.01 7 /3 1 /2 0 0 0 0.5 73 7 /2 0/199 9 2 .2 3 7/2 3 /1 9 9 7 2 4/1 7/199 6 1.8 B R IN K ER RUN 1 0 /1 4 /0 2 0 .0 6 1 2 CAP RUNOFF 1 2 /3 0 /0 2 415 11 /25/02 65.1 1 0 /3 1 /0 2 102 9 /2 7/02 5 0 .9 ** 8 /3 0/02 N o-Flow Conditions 6 /2 8/02 N ot Analyzed* 5 /3 0/02 371 4/3 0/02 3 /2 8/02 279 N ot Sam pled 000171 2/1 9/02 No-Flow Conditions 1 /2 5 /0 2 119 Note: Analytical method changed as of November 2001 (see Section 2.0 for details). * Samples were taken at the respective surface water locations. However, due to an error by the courier, the samples arrived at the lab warm and were not analyzed. **This sample was inadvertently named Stormwater Runoff in the September/Q302 report 02/11/03 1 of 1 Table 3 0.doc Table 4.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Dry Run Landfill Lubeck, WV Sam ple O U TLET 001 O UTLET 003 OUTLET 004 PROPERTY BOUNDARY D ate 1 2 /3 0 /0 2 1 1 /2 1 /0 2 1 0 /3 0 /0 2 9 /3 0/02 8/3 0/02 7/3 1/02 7 /1 /0 2 mm2 mm2 4/2 4 /0 2 3 /2 5 /0 2 2/2 5/02 1/2 8/02 1 2 /1 2 /0 1 1 0 /3 /2 0 0 0 1 2 /2 9 /1 9 9 9 5/1 9/199 8 4 /9 /1 9 9 6 12 /30/02 11 /30/02 1 0 /3 0 /0 2 9/3 0/02 8 /3 0/02 7 /1 /0 2 6/2 8 /0 2 5 /2 8/02 4/2 9/02 3 /2 6/02 2/2 5/02 1 /2 8 /0 2 1 2 /1 2 /0 1 1 2 /3 0 /0 2 1 1 /3 0 /0 2 10 /30/02 9/3 0/02 8/3 0 /0 2 7/1 /0 2 mm2 mm2 4/2 7/02 mm2 mm2 1 /2 8 /0 2 1 2 /1 2 /0 1 1 0 /3 0 /0 2 8/3 0/02 mm2 4/2 4 /0 2 3/2 5/02 mm2 1/2 8/02 1 2 /1 2 /0 1 1 0 /3 /2 0 0 0 1 2 /2 9 /1 9 9 9 7 /1 4/199 8 4 /9 /1 9 9 6 C -*(U R /1 ) 5 6 .9 6 4 .6 8 1 .7 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 3 0 .9 41 7 1 .6 43 .9 41 .6 No-flow conditions 3 1 .5 66 17 86 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 2 5 .3 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 20.1 6 .7 7 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 0 .7 0 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 158 No-flow conditions No-flow conditions No-flow conditions 3 .8 0 No-flow conditions 9.41 6 .6 9 2 2 .8 3.81 11.1 3.9 9 10.3 39 0 .8 8 9 .9 000172 02/11/03 1 of 2 Table 4 0.doc Table 4.0 Summary of Analytical Results: C-8 in Surface Water Dry Run Landfill Lubeck, WV Sam ple D ate C-8 (ue/n STREAM SAM PLING PO INT#1 1 0 /3 0 /0 2 8 /3 0/02 5 /2 8/02 4/2 4/02 3 /2 5 /0 2 2/2 5/02 1 /2 8 /0 2 1 .6 3 No-flow conditions 1.63 0 .9 3 2 1 .0 6 0 .8 5 0 0 .8 9 3 1 2 /1 2 /0 1 1 .1 9 1 0 /3 /2 0 0 0 12/29/19 99 0.7 58 0 .5 4 5 /1 9 /1 9 9 8 1 STREAM SAM PLING P O IN T#2 1 0 /3 0 /0 2 8/2 0/02 5/2 8/02 4/2 4/02 3 /2 5/02 2 9 .2 No-flow conditions 5 1 .0 28 .9 6 6 .6 2/2 5/02 1 /2 8 /0 2 2 4 .3 4 2 .4 1 2 /1 2 /0 1 1 0 /3 /2 0 0 0 2 0 .5 27 .6 12 /29/1999 87 5/1 9/199 8 4 .6 DRLEACHATE 1 0 /3 0 /0 2 704 5 /2 8/02 150 4/2 4/02 237 3 /2 5/02 334 2/2 5 /0 2 256 1 /2 8/02 398 1 2 /1 2 /0 1 109 1 0 /3 /2 0 0 0 2 7 .4 12/29/19 99 34 5/1 9/199 8 56 7/2 2 /1 9 9 7 62 PO N D UNDERD RAIN 10 /30/02 mm2 3 8 .8 6 7 .4 4/2 4 /0 2 3 3 .4 3/2 5/02 66 .7 2/2 5 /0 2 37.1 1 /2 8 /0 2 2 9 .3 1 2 /1 2 /0 1 3 5 .4 Note: Analytical method changed as of November 2001 (see Section 2.0 for details). 02/11/03 2 of 2 000173 Table 4 0.doc FIGURES 000174 OUTFALL OOSA I1-DIGAEUSNNTAIIOTERNBOB-PAOICNOS OUTLET 0 0 7 OUTFALL 0 0 2 A t-jv OUTLET 105 1f I -r 1t fsS \0 I. LEGEND OUTLET 0 0 5 OUTFALL SAMPLING POINT 00017G r ! I I >H ' i I ,? 1 I LEGEND OUTLET 0 0 5 OUTFALL SAMPLING POINT 000177 ! O O O /7 7 # DGBOMCD mtmls SJO MANN DEL OCCXCD TDL APPMMD(D9QN) ASH A*fwwD(coti*ucnotO (SPUR!) ^ Corporate Remediation Group /4n A llia nce between DuPont and UBS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 C - 8 IN SURFACE WATER DECEMBER 2002 D u P o n t W a s h in g to n W orks F a c ility W a s h in g to n , W est V irg in ia wu mi m w ic . neunc A* town 01/31/2003 74230004 1.2 LEGEND -------- SURFACE WATER SAMPLE 000179 SCAL 400 0 a c c o n ta 800' OCStONCD DRAWN DEL CHECKED TOL APPKO VtD (M SG N ) MfTVLS A P P M vnK coN snm cnotO Corporate Remediation Group An Alliance between DxLpQnt and URS Diamond Barley Mill Plaza, Building 27 Wilmington, Delaware 19805 SURFACE WATER SAMPLE LOCATION MAP Local Landfill Washington, West Virginia EMUE OMt ce ru i& MURE A* ifccw Ot/07/2003 7421B0U 2.1 SITE LOCATION MAP fiu oi/9i / m Letart Landfill Site Letart. WV m. MM OHI mmntmmm \ nm "" ""** 3.0 000 Ci r i p i . \i 'i ' ft :I 000183 b ZlOOi LE 1200' 2400' 0E9O H E D K .0AVIS MNNN DEL CHECKED INTTIALS APPRCMXKDESGN) APPRO*CD(OONSreUCnON} QOOO I2 U c\ SITE LOCATION MAP Corporate Remediation Group d n Alliance between DuPont and (JRS Diamond B a rle y Mill P la za , B u ild in g 27 W ilm ington, D elaw are 19805 Dry Run Landfill Lubeck, West Virginia im i Am town mi 1 1 /8 /0 1 cto n s m . 7422BOOS nam e 4 .0 APPENDICES 000187 APPENDIX A LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY 000188 Proven Results. Analytical Results Washington Works C8 Sampling 12/02 DuPont Sample Identification APFO (ng/L) W W K-Z-Outfall 001 WWK-Z-Outfall 002 WWK-Z-Outfall 003 WWK-Z-Outfall 005 WWK-Z-Outfall 007 WWK-Z-Outfall 105 WWK-Z-Outfall 005-2 WWK-K-EQBLK-1 Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is apipoximately 10 ng/L Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for the procedure is 50 ng/L ND - Compound not detected 9760 2370 680 6390 263 6070 6620 NQ NQ - Compound detected at a level between the LOD and LOQ. Result is not quantifiable. ND<LOD<NQ<LOQ Results are calculated according to the following crrteiia If th e sam ple an d laboratory duplicate are greater than 2 5 0 ng/L, arid th e relative percent difference (R P D ) is less than 2 0 , the a v erag e value is reported. If the R P D is g reater than 20, th e higher value is reported. If th e sam ple an d laboratory duplicate are less tha 2 5 0 n g /L a n d th e absolute difference is less than 50, the a v e ra g e va lu e is reported. If the absolute difference is g reater th an isp, the higher va lue is reported. \ j-0 07 000189 3 0 5 8 Research Drive State College, PA 16801, USA T. 814.272.1039 F: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .1 5 8 0 exygen.com APPENDIX B CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS WASHINGTON WORKS FACILITY 000190 CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM RESEARCH Exygen Research Sample Receiving * 3 1 1 7 Research Drive State College, PA 16 8 0 1, USA T: 8 14 .2 3 1.8 0 3 2 F: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .1 5 8 0 exygenresearch.com Page of PROJECT INFORMATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Client (name & address): ___ fih/x M t^iVv- I n / /% ' / v / v V Phone: JW - , t A' j7 Fax Sampler: " f e ^ k v v c j ) Project Manager (Name & E-mail Address): ____________________^ .................................................................. ________(. . /-I,./-, P frj/k yi Project Name: / Ji /' RO. # : $ t c C w . S C i ' , % * # / < . < i ? X 7>" Quotation #: Please fill out this form completely to ensure correct analysis and proper handling of your samples. SAMPLE ANALYSIS ExytlMS# Client Sample Identification U W o - f U l y 'i i - - O itT h './f C i i i 3WC-Z_ t%,L*l( - ^ - C~j// *// }*-A C L Voat-tf i 3<foo*5 Jl >t'S (A i *1006 l*nvk- 2 />5 C lA tfM zJL outfall (. JVo+A t^Lsk - U- g A u L t f - f LAB USE ONLY Collection Date |.JrCj'Q2 11 U-^-oc J Specify Matrix Comments _________ / If) / V ri Vf 1 I / (ay k'6J ^ x i V t ' / k V 'y > ^ / i ^ r s K i / X.Vc-s'-) i `/ j WV Vi l?y / / / V T/i-ry/ ^ `rs v i v / v y *)' 9 X <o sv,j \ O Os v\ x k vk X X: 4 \X -k I t [4 J .t 7 .T 1 -i ii x _C ^-.2. z l *Z ?.2 0009 CHAIN OF CUSTODY Relinquished by Date Time W V 0 3 - V"\ \ 5 OTHER INFO RM ATIO N Cooler ID # f/o o a tll f Received fw >crO ' Cooler Temp. (C) Date Time -n~2, LAB USE ONLY jH L PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Results Deadline: Laboratory Report Options: [D Sample results only f~l Add case narrative CD Add quality control summary 0 Add calibration summary 1 I Add raw data CDO th e r ____ 000191 APPENDIX C LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS LOCAL LANDFILL 900192 TM Proven Results. RCH Analytical Results Local Landfill C8 Sampling 12/02 DuPont Sample identification APFO (ng/L) LCL-Z-Outfall 004 New West Stream LCL-Z-Outfall 004 Old Wst Stream LCL-Z-Outfall 005 New Central Stream LCL-Z-Outfall 005 Old Central Stream LCL-K-EQBLK-1 LCL-Z-Leachate Inlet 002 LCL-Z-Outlet 101 10700 12500 9510 38100 ND 81700 49500 Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is appoximately 10 ng/L Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for the procedure is 50 ng/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between the LOD and LOQ. Result is not quantifiable. ND < LOD < NQ < LOQ Results are calculated according to the following criteria If the sample and laboratory duplicate are greater than 25 0 ng/L, and the relative percent difference (RPD) is less than 20, the average value is reported. If the RPD is greater than 20, the higher value is reported. If the sample and laboratory duplicate are less tha 250 ng/L, and the absolute difference is less than 50, the average value is reported. If the absolute difference is greater than 50, the higher value is reported. 000193 ,3058 Research Drive |S ta te College, PA 1 6 8 0 1 , USA I.T . 814.272.1039 iL F : 814.231.1580 exygen.com APPENDIX D CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS LOCAL LANDFILL 0 0 1 9 4 CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM Exygen Research Sample Receiving * 3 1 1 7 Research Drive State College, PA 16 8 0 1, USA T: 8 14 .2 3 1.8 0 3 2 F: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .1 5 8 0 exygenresearch.com Page of PROJECT INFORMATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Client (name & address): Project Manager (Name & E-mail Address): X'.`7 / V ...f. , - A. -, -, r /h , li. /r \ t A?, 7 J i . . - - c . XX s?//<-/f s'*., /i.*-/. >. A,.,.A 1/f.iX. r / , , * -,/ /'.cvC A-~,/`,i , "j, 1- *_f ib?,._ _____ t. j d . Phone: 0 - T1*:- u >x ............. Project Name: C- X -friyX-l Fax: \ P.O. # : L <r-a- & M AXc-Xs Sampler: S> i V Quotation #: U Please fill out this form completelyto ensure correct analysis and proper handling of your samples. \ 1: U00i SAAAPLE ANALYSIS E x yLIM S# Client Sample Identification Collection Collection Date Time tgH^nCOgfrfi- C JH02O~{ L-Ci- 2i--'Tf*//i -f/uj*4 L _3`-{oio--l_ LcL-2 o .i T F -H i h ' h' i-.fr . r . ir.a u .-, L QLo-J? CCl" 7- -e-fX // <of(.Zc.t 3 ygco-y m a 5 0 L 3 Hoi 0 - 5 I C l - X - ( \ S0 L JHoirU LC,L-^-Uh^VelK^H(ll l>Mr03 \ 3 3 0 C 3 H0 1 0 5 U l - 2 .- Q V x\W V\ft\ l AB USE OMIY UM , Specify Matrix T -r- / r Comments `S'iJ'i.i / w )v / l W/ i ' i s i f t l 1r r w ) GHfioH *5z o f i jG trfc CHAIN OF CUSTODY Relinquished by Date t// /-^1` l> \U > Time (Jo* V -\\C > OTHER INFORMATION Cooler ID # -A?Sent'jt>& Cooler Temp. (C) 5 Received by ^ Date Time ^Xv^-<s}- c r v ^ o / / j / l ---------------- :-- -------- -- - //it ' 1/ LAB USE ONLY (m o i 95 ..Mr & le )C x L 7 X X K H 8 1 ?.T- 7.7 1 1 V& l.t 7a H 8.1 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Results Deadline: Laboratory Report Options: 0 Sample results only 1 I Add case narrative Add quality control summary Add calibration summary 0 Add raw data 0 Other_______________ APPENDIX E LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS LETART LANDFILL 000196 Proven Results. RC H Analytical Results LeTart Landfill C8 Sampling 12/02 DuPont Sample Identification APFO (ng/L) LTL-Z-Outiet 002 LTL-Z-Cap Runoff LTL-K-EQBLK-1 1170000 415000 ND Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is appoximately 10 ng/L Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for the procedure is 50 ng/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between the LOD and LOQ. Result is not quantifiable. ND < LOD < NQ < LOQ Results are calculated according to the following criteria If the sample and laboratory duplicate are greater than 2 50 ng/L, and the relative percent difference (RPD) is less than 20, the average value is reported. If the RPD is greater than 20, the higher value is reported. If the sample and laboratory duplicate are less tha 250 ng/L, and the absolute difference is less than 50, the average value is reported. If the absolute difference is greater than 50, the higher value is reported. 0007 000197 ,3058 Researdi Drive State College, PA 1 6 8 0 1 , USA exygen.com APPENDIX F CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS LETART LANDFILL 000198 CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM Exygen Research Sample Receiving 3 1 1 7 Research Drive State College, PA 16 8 0 1, USA T: 8 14 .2 3 1.8 0 3 2 F: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .1 5 8 0 exygenresearch.com P a g e _____ o f ______ PROJECT INFORMATION ANALYSES REQUESTED Client (name & address): if- ~ hi , h / } it/A a 7/ /L ? / Phone: b /W e r '' / ') * Fax:____- a - . ______ :__ Pk_ A _ _____________ Sampler: 'kN S Q M O Project Manager (Name & E-mail Address): A i <A < b Project Name: O u j /J, C $> )}./* * P- # : . A < f j , - > y ft < ' n ? ,1 ,, 4 * Quotation # : 9v 'S! Vi Vi \ 'i 1 C om posite Number of C o n ta in e rs - ' -f. t Please fill out this form completely to ensure correct analysis and proper handling of your samples. SAMPLE ANALYSIS ExyLlMsr Client Sample Identification Collection Date Collection Time I -iOr,t O L h /c i'l A it " 7 - 2 + O .rff^ i> t X g,0 Z_ \l-l r T V \ s s f 7 Z . - 2- ~ $ L n - tf' * L ie ~ / lB-v} \ V S S > < \\$ 3 X Specify Matrix J ... u , 4 - , . ' Xi X X J y Comments L v r jy i ) ^ r ir r v n s - y / v y .jy x 'r js -y / v r U o \ \ * x_ 1 5 Xy K JC X ^y>1-" S S > N 7.ir 7 .X -- JA V f U l. 60 0 C O 0 LAB USE ONLY CHAIN OF CUSTODY Relinquished by Date Time 1) U V> O o Cooler ID # J/ecu,r I Cooler Temp. (C) >rJ Received by ! Date .-VV' Time ixfnixi^ /C'i 4 OTHER INFORMATION LAB USE ONLY 000189 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Results Deadline: Laboratory Report Options: 0 Sample results only 0 Add case narrative 0 Add quality control summary 0 Add calibration summary 0 Add raw data 0 Other______________ APPENDIX G LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS DRY RUN LANDFILL 000200 Proven Results. RC H Analytical Results Dry Run Landfill C8 Sampling 12/02 DuPont Sample Identification APFO (ng/L) DRL-Z-Outlet 001 56900 Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is appoximately 10 ng/L Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for the procedure is 50 ng/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between the LOD and LOQ. Result is not quantifiable. ND < LOD < NQ < LOQ Results are calculated according to the following criteria If the sample and laboratory duplicate are greater than 250 ng/L, and the relative percent difference (RPD) is less than 20, the average value is reported. If the RPD is greater than 20, the higher value is reported. If the sample and laboratory duplicate are less tha 250 ng/L, and the absolute difference is less than 50, the average value is reported. If the absolute difference is greater than 50, the higher value is reported. 0 0Q7 000201 058 Research Drive .State College, PA 16 80 1, USA LT: 814.272.1039 ik F : 814.231.1580 exygen.com APPENDIX H CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS DRY RUN LANDFILL 000202 CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM Exygen Research Sam ple Receiving * 3 1 1 7 Research D rive State College, PA 1 6 8 0 1 , USA T: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .8 0 3 2 * F: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .1 5 8 0 ex yg en research.com P a g e ______ o f _______ ON oo o CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM Exygen Research Sam ple Receiving * 3 1 1 7 Research Drive State College, PA 1 6 8 0 1 , USA T: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .8 0 3 2 F: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .1 5 8 0 exyg en research.com P a g e ______ o f _______ PROJECT INFORMATION Client (name & address): /)h C /u fi'/./, V ) .. A Phone: _ ju* K-j -j ?> - Sampler: b,. aV y ^ . r __________ ..... . FYoject Manager (Name & E-mail Address): Z1-) / A t -C f. b /?L-s, - O -i/f c/L, ,if'../ t' , Project Name: C ,r u/v, RO. $ _ s ` v \fl~ A/t bj. i //, fC Quotation # : Please fill out this form completely to ensure correct analysis and proper handling of your samples. G rab Com posite Number of C o n ta in e rs SAMPLE ANALYSIS ExyLIMS# Client Sample Identification no* N O SVXWv'AsO Collection Collection Date Time * Specify Matrix Comments ANALYSES REQUESTED 1 $ 4 \ 1 Is \j r"i Y c Jk \ ,; LAD USE ONLY CHAIN OF CUSTODY Relinquished by Date Tim e Cooler ID # Received by OTHER INFORMATION tQ 0 0 4 LAB USE ONLY Cooler Temp. (C) O - . j Date U /lib ic i Tim e V i -VC PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Results Deadline: Laboratory Report Options: CD Sample results only f~l Add case narrative CD Add quality control summary I I Add calibration summary CD Add raw data CD Other________________ CHAIN OF CUSTODY/ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM Exygen Research Sam ple Receiving * 3 1 1 7 Research Drive State College, PA 1 6 8 0 1 , USA T: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .8 0 3 2 F: 8 1 4 .2 3 1 .1 5 8 0 exyg en research.com P a g e ______ o f _______ PROJECT INFORMATION Client (name & address): ru. .l i___ ------------------ Phone: Fax: Sampler: /r .7*>>-<pj> - St <># Project Manager (Name & E-mail Address): _____________ /a7 't ____________/ _____________________ Project Name: ____________ I $ l-'jJl - ________________________ ,________ ____________________________________ PO. # : Z/ZZA- 'jpjro'i'i Quotation # : Please fill out this form completely to ensure correct analysis and proper handling of your samples. SAMPLE ANALYSIS ExyllMS# Client Sample identification h t - ~2-c*,tLh 6e j Collection Collection Date Time o *- o a. `-c J3 <V E Et uo 3 O Z U Specify Matrix A -I * ^ Comments Pi r -*</> / ^ r j y / ANALYSES REQUESTED X * 3 N. \ `L 4 \l > -% v'1 I N O CD \\\C \ N v N r ffil: LAB USE ONLY CHAIN OF CUSTODY Relinquished by Date Tim e O il 1ER INFORMATION 00020S Cooler ID # Received by LAB USE ONLY PROJECT REQUIREMENTS r Cooler Temp. (C) .z Results Deadline: Date Tim e / c W Laboratory Report Options: \ 0 Sample results only Add case narrative n Add quality control summary D A d d calibration summary n Add raw data CD O th e r _______________