Document zov8dmXEqqxkqjBdmx89m8RQm

SDH nieaewaB PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT RMC- 1 7 NORTHWEST ENVIROCON, INC. MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORT for REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY SHERWIN ALUHINA PLANT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS APRIL 1990 F REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY SHERWIN ALUMINA PLANT CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORT Table of Contents: Section: Description: Page #: 1 Monthly Management Report Summary of Work 1-1 2 Letter from Dennis Hudson, NWE Corporate office to Frank Strickland, RMC Sherwin , Plant dated March 7, 1990. 2-4 3 Meeting minutes from a Project Committee. Meeting held on April 2, 1990. 3-8 4 Letter from Clare R. (Randy) Hall, NWE President to Jack Barbee, RMC Sherwin Plant dated April 5, 1990. 4-10 5 Intracompany correspondence from Jack Barbee, RMC Sherwin plant to Frank Strickland, RMC Sherwin Plant. 5-12 6 Reynolds Metals Company Sherwin Plant * work specification. 6-16 7 f l I B***+r 'fi 004242 MONTHLY PROJECT REPORT HEPA AIR FILTRATION CONSOLES RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: DATE SAMPLE # CONSOLE # F/CC 4/2/90 4/25/90 4/28/90 4/28/90 5/2/90 5/2/90 5/8/90 5/19/90 6/8/90 6/6/90 6/15/90 6/17/90 22-NAE4 144-NAE6 157-NAE8 174-NAE5 195-NAE7 203-NAE15 232-NAE7 283-NAE11 372-NAE4 346-NAE9 NAE7 NAE3 2173 2170 2170 2170 2170 2168 2169 2168 2170 2169 2173 1 .156 .09 .02 .06 .90 .40 .0169 .04 .015 .0178 .2 .02 *PRE ABATEMENT RECOMMENDATION: + PERFORM TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY ( AT CONTRACTORS EXPENCE ) - IF THIS OPTION IS SELECTED SAMPLING SHOULD BE PERFORMED WHILE MACHINE IS IN OPERATION DURING REMOVAL. REASONING FOR THIS IS PRE ABATMENT SAMPLES HAVE RETURNED WITH A LOW FIBER DENSITY , PROBLEMS HAVE NOT OCCURED UNTIL REMOVAL HAS STARTED. (POSSIBILITY OF BLOW BY OF H.E.P.A. FILTER ) HEPA AIR FILTRATION CONSOLES TO BE TAKEN OFF LINE AND REMOVED FROM SITE IF PROBLEM CAN NOT BE RESOLVED IN THE VERY IMMEDIATE FUTURE. *PERMISSABLE EXPOSURE LEVEL ACCORDING TO FEDRAL LAW IS .2 SPECIFICATIONS DETECTION LEVEL IS .01. JOEL SHERIDAN ___ 004243 NORTHWEST ENVIROCON, INC. 16811 El Camino Real, Suite 119 Houston, TX 77058 (713)488-8688 FAX (713) 488-8787 NORTHWEST ENVIROCON, INC. MONTHLY PROJECT REPORT TO PLANT MANAGER ^oco^ Project Managers Certified Industrial Hygienists Environmental Consultants Training Programs DATE: Mav 1. 1990 PROJECT: Reynolds Metals Company Sherwin Alumina Corpus Christi. Texas SUMMARY: > The purpose of this report as understood by Northwest Envirocon, Inc. <NWE) is to communicate, in brief any relevant events or significant problems encountered in assisting Reynolds Metals Companys' (RMCs) Sherwin Alumina plant located in Corpus Christi, Texas in the removal of asbestos in the facility. Included in this report will be copies of written communication exchanged between RMC, NWE, regulating agencies and abatement contractors. Also included is minutes from meetings with the engineering and environmental department, and any other relevant data. This report will remain a brief three (3) pages for convenience. Referenced documents will be published in bound form with numbered pages. If the format or contents require modification please advise. tfully Submitted, lare R. President 004244 MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORT PREPARED BY NWE CONSULTANT: BRIAN THOMPSON, P.M. REVIEWED AND EDITED BY CLARE R. (RANDY) HALL, PRESIDENT (NWE) HAY 1, 1990 The following report will be inclusive of our activity dates of beginning with the March 22, 1990 startup date through April 30, 1990. Removal Activities: Clean up of the digester area has been started. This part of the plant is a high priority area due to the condition of the asbestos. Various routine maintenance projects have been completed throughout the plant removing asbestos to facilitate maintenance and or repairs. Contractor: Industrial Specialists, Inc. is the abatement contractor in the plant at this time. Their performance to date has been good. Problems encountered have been promptly and efficiently corrected. Coordination: A collective decision was made to initiate weekly meetings with the RMC Environmental and Engineering Departments and the Contractor to facilitate and promote collective understanding of the projects underway and any upcoming projects. These meetings will formally start with the startup of the "capital proj ects." 004245 is :V r' - V:-'0 -* ~ . .. Page 1-1 ' /. \ ;v..; - V.:. ~ v j:. - . v: ;; V- -:p: MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORT (cont.) PREPARED BY NWE CONSULTANT: BRIAN THOMPSON, P.M. REVIEWED AND EDITED BY CLARE R. (RANDY) HALL, PRESIDENT (NWE) MAY 1, 1990 Specifications: We regret any delays in production of the specifications and accept full responsibility for our failure to comprehend your desires and instructions. The following schedule will show the progress of completion dates and meetings. Date : Description: 03/07/90 Submittal of Hurricane Creek Standard specification for review. Refer to document pages 2-4 through 2-5. *03/30/90 Return of marked changes to Hurricane Creek specifications to NWE. 04/02/90 Meeting with Mr. Tom McCracken, RMC Corporate Engineering Dept., RMC Sherwin Alumina Engineering and Environmental Depts. Refer to document pages 3-6 through 3-9 for minutes of meeting dated April 9, 1990. Agreement was made between RMC and NWE t return specifications by 04/09/90. NWE was directed by Jack Barbee to observe Gilman Brothers and report on their compliance. Refer to document pages 4-10 through 4-11. 04/05/90 The first draft of the Sherwin Alumina specifications were returned to RMC. Recitation of letter indicating proble in our performance. Refer to document pages 5-12 through 5-15. MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORT (cont.) PREPARED BY NWE CONSULTANT: BRIAN THOMPSON, P.M. REVIEWED AND EDITED BY CLARE R. (RANDY) HALL, PRESIDENT (NWE) MAY 1, 1990 Specifications (cont.): Date: Description: *04/25/90 Changes to draft #2 returned to NWE. Meeting was held in Corpus Christi, Texas with the RMC Engineering and Environmental Dept. 04/27/90 Specifications completed and 10 copies delivered to RMC. Problems: We perceive the problems in delivery of the specifications as one created by our submitting specifications provided for another RMC alumina facility (Hurricane Creek). We understand now that your plant is specific in your requirements and in hind sight realize that trying to meld the Sherwin Plant specifications and policies into those accepted by another RMC facility was not practical. Likewise our understanding of your instructions to us (reference documents pages 6-16 through 6-21) were clouded by our services being utilized by RMC at various other locations. Our perception of your needs overshadowed your instructions. In the future we will read, listen and follow instructions ver batium. We now realize that well meaning efforts and intentions can create a nuisance, if not a problem, when they vary from specific instructions. We are looking forward to continuing services at the Reynolds Sherwin Alumina Plant and hope that you will find us a helpful part of your asbestos program. Respectfully Submitted, '1// Clare- R. Hall President 004247 ICii- * .v -'.'-.i; -t. .-..Vi'./ ' .* 'Ut'V1 a M8R-07-1SS0 11=52 FROM NU ENUIROCGN - LWSHOUGfiL TO 1 713 489 8767 P.02 NORTHWEST ENVIROCON, INC. 3415 Truman Strwt/P.O. Box 169 Washougal, WA 98671 (206) 835-8576 (503)230-0702 FAX (206)835-3729 Project Managers Certified Industrial Hygienists Environmental Consultants Training Programs March 7,1990 Mr. Frank Strickland Reynolds Metals Company Alumina & Chemical Division, Sherwin Plant Highway 361 Gregory, TX 78359 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Enclosed is a set of our standard technical specifications for asbestos abatement. This set does not include a sample of every section we use from time to time; for example, it contains only one respirator section and, depending upon the project, we use one of three different sections. In addition, these specs are written around OSHA and state-approved equivalent plans rather than MSHA; thus, editing is required. We can, with approximately 12 hours of billable time, re-edit these specs for generic use at the .Sherwin plant so that only the Summary ofWork section would change from project to project. All respiratory sections, for example, would have the same section number for cross reference purposes and to simplify the table of contents. Our standard protocol with specifications is to spend as much time as is needed up front to get all involved parties - purchas1-**. engineering, environmental, legal, Northwest Envirocon - in mutual agreement -ceptance of the form and content. Subsequent issuance of specifications then bet a largely clerical task. So we encourage and request editing, revisions, rccom: nations, questions and any other suggestions regarding specifications. Also, I advised Tommy that our mileage rate for Reynolds is $.30 per mile, this rate is in the current agreement, and this rate will roll over Into the next agreement. Tommy advised me we are not billing you for mileage in and out of Corpus, and I want to take this opportunity to confirm that with you in writing. We at Northwest Envirocon are looking forward to serving the Sherwin plant and working with all the fine people there to accomplish a mission for Reynolds Metals Company. 00424.8 Seattle' (206) 251*6033 Page 2-4 (509) 337-6403 Hot (713)4 MPP-07-1SS0 11:53 FROM NU ENUIROCGN - UfiSHOUGSL TO Mr. Frank Strickland March 7,1990 Page 2 NORTHWEST ENVIROCON, INC. Dennis Hudson Executive Vice President Enclosure: Reymet Hurr Crk Tech Specs (2) il r :> i ' 1 713 488 8787 P.03 April 9, 1990 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: Anr.il,2. .1990, TIME: P -M. - Monday The following represents a brief summary of an organizational meeting conducted at Reynolds Metal's Sherwin Alumina Plant in Corpus Christi> Texas. The,purpose of this meeting was to clarify duties and responsibilities of Northwest Envirocon, Inc. (NWE) and Reynolds Metals Company (RMC). Jack Barbee Ed Peterson Bill Hamlin Walter Lew (RMC) (RMC) (RMC) (RMC) ATTENDANCE Hector DeLargarza (RMC) Tom McCracken (RMCC) Randy Hall (NWE) Brian Thompson (NWE) CONCLUSIONS 1. NWE will be responsible for the compliance with the specifications. 2. NWE will not interfere with the contractors progress unless he is in violation with the RMC specification. 3. NWE will develop a carbonless "report of variance" form to facilitate and expedite the communication of variances or a lack of compliance. 4. Distribution will include but not be limited to Jack Barbee, Walter Lew, the contractor representative and NWE corporate. 5. V; "Llr RMC will have two designated groups with control over the project, the. Environmental-Dept.yr(RMCE) and .Engineering Dept:` (RMCENG) . ,, 6. NWE will have no responsibilities with regard to pur- " chasing. NWE."wiir provide a'timeframe and;.budget' to .facilitate ' a compliance audit. _ ._ fit' Asbestos Abatement Project Committee Meeting Page Two 8. RMC will keep NWE informed of the locations and schedules for upcoming capital projects and maintenance projects, to enable us to schedule manpower and equipment. 9. The flow of information and scheduling of meetings with the contractor (excluding purchasing), will include a representative from NWE. (Without participation in decisions and meetings with the contractor, NWE will be rendered ineffective.) 10. RMC will expedite the resolution of any and all issues or variances encountered. 11. NWE will provide daily logs to provide a permanent record of all asbestos related activities. 12. When requested NWE will provide assistance in other environmental problems. 13. NWE, RMC, and the contractors will have a weekly project meeting to assist in any communication and scheduling problems necessary to complete a project of this magnitude. RECOHHENDATIONS 1. RMC will appoint a representative from maintenance and or production to participate in the weekly meetings. This will keep the team informed of any anticipated or scheduled maintenance that may require some form of abatement thus eliminating the vast majority of emergency work, overtime costs and production delays. This will also allow enough time to sample and verify that the material is asbestos and the expenditure is justified. 2. Sample all proposed asbestos projects. This facility has not been thoroughly surveyed. We recognize that capital projects have been scored and determined, 004251 these projects should be sampled to verify the types .--and percentages ;.of . asbestos contained , in the scope /jof- 'i work. (Different types of asbestos require different engineering controls, wetting agents,. etc. for. -removal.) -In many cases this sampling will' show `some ' areas assumed to be asbestos to Jpe ^as_bestos^f ree. ..... ^ ,p=. -eliminating "them :froir/the"sc'ope:.dfv.workCarid-Tthevcosts' associated - . Asbestos Abatement Project Committee Meeting Page Three 3. Code the contractors time sheets to delineate activities: Example: 1. Supervisors Foreman Clerical A - Administration 2. Workers M - Mobilization R - Removal D - Demobilization I - Insulation Mobilization - will consist of all tasks including but limited to equipment repair, scaffold erection. containment erection, etc. Removal - will include the time associated with actual asbestos removal. Demobilization - this will include the time involvsd with finishing the project after the asbestos exposure is no longer being encountered. Insulation - time spent insulating. The reasoning for the coding system is to assist RMC in proving that workers who have been onsite removing asbestos have received exposure monitoring while they were engaged in exposure related activities. It is our understanding that some workers have been onsite for several years. In the event of future litigation, it will prove invaluable to be able to cross reference this data with entry/exit logs to substantiate a workers time weighted average (TWA) - dose response relationship. This coding system will also provide an excellent tool to associate unit prices with manhours expended while doing work on a time and material basis. It is also useful in comparing contractor performance. 4. Develop a plan to verify, document and identify all of the areas that have been reinsulated with asbestos .materials^ . Due .to the size and construction dates of this facility, " it is reasonable to assume that most thermal insulation .. contains asbests. With proper, hazard communipa.tion^.. ^ihaHvertents^exposufes ;can-be":eiimihated lr>:;:Sampling `wIll--'''- 'provide positive'proof on a project to project basis Asbestos Abatement Project Committee Meeting Page Four Onoe the asbestos has been replaced there has to be a system to provide proof that the material is asbestos free without the time delays and costs associated with sampling. Colored bands and warning labels will not be a lasting solution in this plant and new insulation will quickly look old. One solution is to provide catalogs of isometric drawings to your engineering, maintenance and environmental departments clearly displaying tanks, piping systems and equipment that has been upgraded to an asbestos free condition. Finally, these are merely a few of many suggestions that we have proven to work in other industrial facilities to reduce the liability and control the costs associated with the process. Respectfully Submitted, CRH/sr cc: Attendees Clare R. Hall President, NWE 004253 'LVUBQ, j NORTHWEST ENVIROCON, INC. ' 16811 El Camino Raal, Suite 119 Houston, TX 77058 (713)488-8688 FAX (713) 488-8787 April 5, 1990 Project Managers Certified Industrial Hygienists Environmental Consultants Training Programs Jack Barbee Reynolds Metals Company Sherwin Alumina Plant P.0. BOX 9911 Corpus Christi, Texas 78469 Dear Mr. Barbee: I would like to start this letter by thanking you for giving us the opportunity to provide our services. > In response to your request to monitor the activities of Gillman Brothers, apparently they have completed their segment of their contract involving asbestos abatement. They are currently insulating some tanks. While insulating tanks is not abatement it does require a industrial knowledge and a well organized company to undertake a project of this magnitude to complete it in a workman like manner. Our investigation of work history was directed to the following agencies and individuals: 03/39/90 - Paul Henderson EPA Dallas Texas (214) 655-7244 Results: No citations issued over the last four quarters. 03/29/90 - Herbert Williams, Director Steve Rossing y: Texas Air Control Board (713) 666-4964 Results: No citations issued over the last four quarters'/ 03/29/90 - Joe Stone ^ g^^'^/^ri;--^v^;-:':ii;v^vCi'iAsb`estd6'-iIilcehsIhg/Texas.-'Dept-vf of ":He alth ..... (512)' 958-7-2^ ` 004254 ;rv... ; Results: `' No citations issued-over the last four quarters.......................... g$iana/Vancouver' : - c^r.v.-.-rzj--V //.2Q6)835-8576 Eugene ' Seattle ' ' Sookahe "* Jack Barbee April 5,1990 Page Two 03/29/90 - O.S.H.A. <713) 750-1830 : Results: No response (results are forth coming.) 03/29/90 - Leonard Mormon Texas Dept., of O.S.H.A. Solid Waste Division <512) 458-7271 Results: Approved disposal site for asbestos waste in Colorado County. Tri Oil Environmental Landfill. Permit #203. The results of our regulatory research provided any negative information in regards contractor. has not to this We are willing to work with anyone who is willing to work with Reynolds and Northwest Envirocon, Inc. It is our desire to provide service and assist Reynolds in anyway possible to limit your liability and save you money. Respectfully Submitted, Clare R. Hall, President CRH/sar cc: Walter Lou, Environmental Manager - RMC, Corpus Christi, Texas ,.V. T - 1' * V\: ~r* ' Page `4-11 *V: 004255 r. " u'-' Company correspondence i . ht`$& Peterson. - v:.: / W. Lew, B. Harblin M is6<*. ''' * 4/11/90 :t? '-. -rt>.. ' Review o Northwest Enviroccn, Inc. Proposed Asbestos Abatement Specifications ; *' VV"V. . nwh submitted their specification vihich has been tailored for .the Sherwin. the ttdsurrigrstarellngs occur, as .follows? Their relationship' to;contractors is incorrect.' ?> i *** -V '} . J+jJ fcfl They state that they are . the in fact they are our consultant.* reporting relationships incorrect ZWltiG--' s <RMC*s)(r y have, .the tstftctf q o<J ct-iUf* k:,: :^personne.lug"-;,:Approval of' all items comes rcm~ FWC personnel and not the owner's consultant. On page 01091*2, NWS states that they will represent the owner during construction' and until final payment. They further state that K42*s *- . .--H instructions to the contractor shall be forwarded through NWS. Th^ Ss not L the case at any tine'except during an jsnsrgency^PSC^tian'TTafc :,-.d which tires NWS nay shut down the job. -\rr-ri--- ^ ./ 'V: 2. This specificaticn'includes many procurercant items which are'not included in NWE/s current responsibilities. . . `i--?'}.'.-ra.jjjg - - . . ; ,.o\ They make numerous mention of: `.Contract Documents -'l '"' . .. Payinants.,p4^^^^^^^-- / , . . . . ' .. Successful Bidder Certificate of Insurance.*-----> JZi^ri^ouO -*; ` k Retadnage BMC Right to Cancel Contracts / r. -w -.^c " ' FReinsuamlePSayumbemntistt.al for Minimvum= W ork Experie. nce Above'S" Load X *^c ^ * Certification Requirements for Abatement Workers T .^-V.- - 3. They have tried to incorporate contract administration in their specification. . ....... * .V*.--,,;* t.i.WV'-iv'"^-vV..v-!'-l. -T^ tfta ^ fR*31* Spec. KS-UM004 is subordinate'to" ': i]**J* the opposite. -.Their . */v***V. U Hi}*?"*1* R- *-J"a 7?Ur- /J^-<oS A mi ,-W^V ';?;:.;v'i^ .'. ypr.^- " continuous reference to CSHA (we' are covered by MSHA); said^ contractor is to dedicate individual circuits to negative machines (RC.roay not be able to shut down other circuits) ^. Vx.\'.\^ ;V: 4* ) Enquiring sophisticated equipment that our local contractors do _not have.For small jobs, they require the use of specialized -7*<=C51i. equipment such as drills and saws having integral ventilation heeds. It is my opinion that the contractor should be allowed ay</L opportunity_to submit a work plan that will meet ............................' > -i' ft Pi CO * * *'* *$-* S..OZtCr ^ VW JZiPtJfi-H1'* 90* NWS does not have ah established procedure to change' or notify. ` *. .r-their requirements 'in an acceptable fashion* t)iPtSk.'"-y!* 5>W...e he-_a_r__f_r_a_n_.\t.h~e ifi-e^ ljd " field that are not in this 'that"KWE will only have two (2) of=-T^*r' .duras to the contractors: a*'With this proposed' (K b. By review of the wo prior to the .work opportunities to specify, proce- *' * - :r> t$C-' If NWS anticipates' the need to issue further revisions to " \-rriNiv-s contractors, they need to establish a'procedure-to .make 'these (fTt***^ revisions and specify this revision procedure in their technical' pGrfcsrar.ee specification. V w;--^--:/: v ^7o ' y Also, I do not understand the NW2 wording that the contractor ^J6J 7~A* coO-A*^ needs an NWE action stamp to start work, nor their distinction- S"h\- j., fj&f' between restricted.use versus final but restricted use. '-TVU.-^O ers rc" . ^Ca--n--r--e--nrt_s_iont>-T--e---c--h--n--i-c--a--l---R--e--q--u.-ir--e--m---e-n-ts-: , ' V- v-:.:.-. v . a. Oar previous Tat>o TyUfJ6S/ feO-^ tsTr^xr SSSOm the use of aggressive required. Dees PVC accept this change? >V*| :t b. I do not think the contractor is capable of providing V/ historic sanpling results of an area of ; work begins, "fes proposed on page 01562 .... a& fu$p< i ** *~ ^ .c. Is it a 'legal" requirement 'to not allo^'wcrke^'to'driji; , water in a contaimrent area as specified on page 01560-4? 3 Cb^M` d. We feel that NWS1 s discussion of barriers (critical, ;" ' orinarv, secondary) [prin^xiy_rsjateg_t^puiJLdihp^ while . the majority of our work is outside* We feeJTthey should conrent on this aspect. '' gotten across that^their current responsibilities are: ' ' a Beccturend performance specifications for abatement requirements" - "5 ... "C t : J * - * r Mm- 1 - >-vv.C ^ :4^tV.^Vvav'VV- *.t. . ; . tij&i.;--,.:-'. i'^'^noiitoring job performance, and reporting same to Etc. V ^ !>-` r.y':. .-yd* Serve as technical consultant on special requests, ;/ V'-'-B.W* ? ' V-v* V* V/: 'Uw- ^w'S^vWilv-^ m< ;ff5 v.T v ..V ,>.' rTjw.itie? y f ` " yjrrVi'V-- ; .:*' f'j'r3^:*V .- .-fc. Petersen ' ' -.:. ; . --V Vet; !****.tf-K-ri&r . w> K::: My ir,).;-. ;, ; WO5--... <0.riV- tV. '- '- ; ' > > '.. ,, . .. ;,.. ! ;* .>.. `-i: *- /rr?^V'A -... " 'v<\vr., . - vJft&ft'i'i'i'v'j?? ." _ ;'iV :/.. ' 1 ' " 1;. ' .*-- .vv'^ys* " xj, ' -'vVv .004259 sv-i.A . .'Vv-;-.:... .` `.,I4 * '' " -' '?* " \'-^ >;>uZt -Page 5-^5.-' " .A '-.is . . MAR-20-lbbtf 11118 FROM i^^H^)3a>bee Date: 2-15-90 Approved:^- NO ENUIROCON - UftSHOUGFL TO NOE HOUSTON P.03 REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY SHERW1N PLANT Work Spec WS-LQ-1012 Page 1 of4^ TITLE: THIRD PARTY ASBESTOS REMOVAL MONITORING AND ADMINISTRATION pUHPUbhY fhe purpose or tms worx specification "is"to issue a contract for tSTrd party administration and monitoring of asbestos removal and handling during normal capital and plant maintenance activities in the Sherwin Plant. This Vendor will be called "Compliance Vendor" In this specification. SCOPE: The Compliance Contractor will be employed to assist and adyise Reynolds Metals Co. in the following areas of asbestos removal and handling: a) Removal of small and large amount of asbestos for both minor abatement and repair and capital project major asbestos insulation repair and removal, b) Establishing Construction Contractor's or plant forces ' procedures to be followed for small to medium emergency asbestos removal and containment jobs during normal or emer gency plant maintenance. Assist RMC personnel in monitoring and implementing these procedures. c) Establishing, monitoring, and maintaining asbestos removal and handling records. WORK TO BE INCLUDED BY VENDOR: a} Compliance Vendor will survey Insulation removal and handling projects as specified by RMC personnel and write procedures to be followed by Reynolds employeed insulation contractors in both removal and handling of asbestos containing materials. b) Compliance Vendor will monitor insulation removal contractor's compliance with procedures as specified in above paragraph. Vendor will make recommendations to the RMC Construction Engineer as to necessary changes or revision to procedures as required. (RMC Construction Engineer will administer contract with insulation Contractor). c) Compliance Vendor will provide laboratory services including air monitoring, bulk sampling and analysis. Environmental assessments and audits (air quality testing on a "as required" or "as requested" basis. ^ 004260 d) Tabulation and documentation of each asbestos removal and handling project and establish acceptable record packagesYfo^^^fv; each individual activity for further reference. This para-' graph will be coordinated with the RMC Construction Engineer who will provide normal daily, construction logs .and dgcu^^s^^^^. iYes.'.required for adequate activity records. - ^Compliance .Vendor will provide in-house asbestos, handy.nSi,^^^^ MftR-20-1990 ill IS FROM NU ENUIROCON - UftSHOUGPL TO JBBarbee 2-15-90 NUE HOUSTON P.04 Work Spec WS-LQ-1012 Page 2 of ^ advice to Reynolds Engineering on an "as requested" basis as well as making an asbestos abatement or removal survey as may be requested by RMC Engineering. Vendor will advise RMC representatives of any unacceptable variances observed in asbestos handling within plant. f) Compliance Vendor may be requested to assist in the approval of insulation contractor qualifications during the bidding process. g) Vendor to provide all insurance, business permits, licenses, etc., required to do business in plant locality, h) Makes monthly compliance reports to Plant Management. WORK NOT INCLUDED: aF Construction coordination and control. b) Project selection (some assistance may be solicited) c) Asbestos survey REYNOLDS METALS CO. TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: a) Selected insulation contractorsb) Engineering supervision of contractor's demolition activities. c) All equipment outage coordination. d) Contractor time sheets including contractor personnel on-the-job identification. e) Project Management and Accounting . f) Project selection (Vendor may be requested to assist in this area as required) g) Office space. Including power, telephone, utilities to Vendor's office. h) Safety equipment required by Vendor except clothing, prescription glasses, and safety shoes. i) Selected items of materials as requested by insulation handling contractors. j) Reproduction and communication facilities. k) Reproduction materials l) Mail service and first aid facilities. ORGANIZATION: 1. The successful asbestos compliance Vendor will report to the Sherwin Environmental .Control Group on matters concerning procedures and compliance. 2. Jhe compliance Vendor, will.work.with the.Sherwin Plant 004261 v-^'Engineering-Constructibn Contract?Administrator in mbnitofiog'^^^r^ the compliance to asbestos handling specifications by the ' ' handling contractor.^ : . V- v;7 '< / * / ' The Sherwin Construction Coordinator.wil^..supply,constructlonr^^^^. ~'''''V>r'ecordsr.f6r>the: pro`ject7ccmpTiahce .'file" t6 "be mafntained^by ^o^-^F MAR-20-1990 11J19 FROM > OBBarbee 2-15-90 NU ENUIROCON - UASHOUGAL TO NUJE HOUSTON P.05 Work Spec WS-LQ-1012 Page 3 of the compliance Vendor. The completeness of the individual project file is the responsibility of the compliance Yendor. 4. The compliance Vendor will communicate any problems or questions concerning his specific contract to the Plant Engineer and/or the Plant Purchasing Agent. >r'' f --.. '*-*"* -i ~ Page 6-18 004262 MflR-20-19`90 ' ili20 FROM NU ENUIROCON - UJfiSHOUGAL TO NUE HOUSTON P.08 -As y .......................ORCASI NATIONAL Ul-::iS Vork Lists Prepared by Plant Staff Vock order written by Plant EnviTrrn-.ental Depart .*ent or by Plant Engineering. Through normal procedure. Purchasing - Secures Vendors. Awards contracts. Abatement Contractor - Computes jobs per specifio.iticns issued by compliance vendor. Reynolds Construction Engirwar a. Arranges Outage b. Signs Tims Sheets & Authorises Charges c. Coordinates Accounting d. Maintains Job History e. Inforces Contractor Compliance with Compliance Vendors Instructions or Recommendations. f. Monitors All Contractors Activities Compliance Ve'ndor t.-t a. Reviews individual job parameters and writes insulation ? removal instructions for abatement contractors compli ance. b. Monitors all asbestos handling activities for compliance - with written instructions. c- Completes all environmental samples required in asbestos removal area* Completes other environmental sampling as requested by RMC. d. Accumulates all individual job records for long term storage and reference. e. Provides other areas of asbestos handling expertise as requested by RMC. f. Writes Monthly Management Report. Permanent Records will he kept in long term storage.' Plant Environmental Group a. Assig~s W.O. to compliance Vendor for design of asbestos handling procedures. Will priority insulation repair or removal jobs. b. Reviews and approves vendors compliance procedures for auditing purposes. c. V.oMtors corplianr: vendors records and er.tcv}ish*d pro':'.-'vuvts. d. Reports to plant r.unegi;:*cut a -effectiveness I program' and compliance vendors perfort.ar.ee. e. Reviews sampling procedures and results. 0042G3 MAR-20-19S0 11:20 FROM NU ENUIRQCON - UASHOUGfiL TO V. \ HUE HOUSTON S4~ca;'ei&>w*'.4* ,,. .......... _ ,,. 0042G4- , . vV!TT-'.i MAR-20-19S0 us 21 FROM NU ENU1ROCON - UASHOUGAL TO NUE HOUSTON P.08 EXHIBIT B - March 1, 1990 Compensation shall be against approved time sheets and reimbursable rates follows: With Errors & Omissions Coverage Service/Classification Short Term Mid-Term Lono Term Certified Industrial Hygienist Contract Administrator Industrial Hygienist Senior Project Manager Special Writer Project Manager Survey Analyst/Draftsman Air Monitoring Technician Clarical/Oata Entry 73.00 73.00 53.50 50.00 50.00 40.00 40.00 37.00 26.00 69,00 69.00 51.00 47.50 47.50 38.00 38.00 35.00 24.50 64.00 64.00 47.00 44.00 44.00 35.00 35.00 32.50 23.00 Bulk Samples Air Sample Cassettes Oupllcatlng/Blndlng Per Diem 21.00 12.00 .04 55.00 21.00 12.00 .04 50.00 21.00 12.00 .04 see note On long term projects, Northwest Envirocon will rent an apartment for their employees. The cost to Reynolds will be apartment rent, utilities and 118.00 per day for meals, but In no case more than $50.00 per day per employee. For example, an apartment and utilities might be $500.00 per month, meals will average $540 par month per employee; If two employees are on the project this would be $1,580, or $37.$2 per working day per employee, average. Of course, this charge applies only to traveling employees. If Northwest Envirocon can hire qualified local employees, there Is no per diem charged. In addition, on projects of one year or longer, ve will relocate the affected employee(s) and recover the moving expenses with a $12.00 per day ($3,000 per year) relocation expense. This will significantly reduce per diem expenses. Clarifications: -Short term Is 6 weeks or less -Mid term is 7 weeks through 6 months -Long term Is over 6 months -Compensation will be based on the lowest applicable rate 004265-:. ^^~ltfe^Wff^Tf^b5?^rivo1ced at cost"plus"!155%% 'IInncclluuddee eeqquuiippmmeenntt rreennttaallss,, subcontractors/subconsultants, survey and field supplies and outside laboratory fees.^ ^ ^ v` ?*and: `freight'r ` T - - ' ' '' ' v